Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
YVR Expansion Plans Questioned By Community  
User currently offlineSLCUT2777 From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 4214 posts, RR: 9
Posted (9 years 8 months 3 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 3678 times:

Check this out over on the CBC site. It appears the area in and around YVR has numerous NIMBYs as well:
YVR is Canada's second busiest airport (After Toronto/Pearson--YYZ). It is also the second busiest airport on the West Coast of North America for International flights, ahead of even both SFO and SEA-TAC (although US/Traans-border operations likely help push it ahead of SFO). Is this proposed expansion viable? Or should alternatives be looked at?

DELTA Air Lines; The Only Way To Fly from Salt Lake City; Let the Western Heritage always be with Delta!
3 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineRobsawatsky From Canada, joined Dec 2003, 597 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (9 years 8 months 3 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 3603 times:

First of all, this is a 20 years looking forward plan, there is nothing more to it than pie-in-the-sky at this time but it does give a bit of a flavour of the small-minded, airport-centric thinking of the YVR Airport Authority and their lack of direct accountability to the public.

I have no great issue with expanding runways or adding more runways, but the road network will require huge changes to support the traffic. Some of the traffic changes could be accomplished by getting airport traffic directly to/from HWY 99 by avoiding surface streets through Richmond but how they expect to restrict the Arthur Laing bridge to airport traffic only I have no idea both from a practical (road network) and political perspective. It is a major commuter route between Richmond and Vancouver. I believe the bridge was built by the federal government for the airport, so they have some justification for restricting it, but all that will do is create traffic jams elsewhere that the same taxpayers will have to pay for. I can't see how it will gain the Airport Authority any popularity since it is hardly the only route to the Airport and will inconvenience airport traffic on the 3 other bridges to the airport and their connecting routes through Richmond.

I've also heard them talking about adding tolls to the Arthur Laing Bridge (and other bridges connecting to Richmond as well). Of course, none of these bridges were built with space to put the necessary size of toll-booth infrastructure.

User currently offlineSergeant655 From Canada, joined Jul 2005, 85 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (9 years 8 months 3 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 3466 times:

for the toll option on the Arthur Laing Bridge they could use electronic tolls which only require sensors with cameras at one end of the bridge. a grade seperated street from highway 99 to YVR would be hard to place as westbound traffic would have to cross from sea island way to Bridgeport road since the bridges over the middle arm ar a block apart from each other. the Canada line guideway would also get in the way.

User currently offlineACDC8 From Canada, joined Mar 2005, 8030 posts, RR: 32
Reply 3, posted (9 years 8 months 3 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 3440 times:

YVR is expanding, as do most airports. It's great to see that the YVR Authority is being aggressive in it's planning, but I am also hoping that they also plan properly. Getting to the airport from HWY 99 can be a real pain at times, it would be much easier (especially for the residents of Richmond) if you could bypass Bridgeport Road completely. One logical way I can see them do this, is by building another bridge that connects the Arthur Laing (or at least Grant McConnachie Way) with the Oak Street Bridge. Idealy, access from both north and southbound traffic, that way you can free up some of the traffic on the Arthur Laing Bridge feeding into Richmond from Vancouver via Granville Street and S.W. Marine Drive.

I'm quite sure the the YVR Authority (or the cities of Richmond and Vancouver), will come up with an ideal solution that will benefit both the passengers of YVR as well as the local community. They already did a great job after the last major expansion, by having Bridgeport Road going straight to Grant McConnachie Way, instead of having to turn left on to No.3 Road, followed by a quick right turn on to the Moray Bridge.

As far as the Canada Line goes, that is something they should have put in place 20 years ago, and when they do come up with the final design, I really hope that it is passenger friendly enough, that you can take your suitcase on it.

A Grumpy German Is A Sauerkraut
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
YVR Future Expansion Plans posted Sat Nov 11 2006 02:17:29 by Flyboy2001
BMed-expansion Plans? posted Wed Jul 5 2006 16:51:25 by BAKrew
Key West (EYW) Expansion Plans - Pics! posted Wed Jun 14 2006 18:37:14 by Vivavegas
Saudia's Expansion Plans Worldwide posted Sun May 21 2006 03:50:53 by Behramjee
MEM...Bizarre Expansion Plans From The 60s posted Sat Apr 15 2006 06:51:21 by JetBlueLuv
Jetstar Expansion Plans posted Thu Apr 13 2006 12:32:51 by B787
U2 Plans Blocked By France's Civil Aviation posted Thu Mar 16 2006 15:36:14 by HBDAN
TS Expansion Plans? posted Fri Mar 3 2006 04:43:27 by Simpilicity
Any Icelandair Expansion Plans? posted Thu Mar 2 2006 11:44:04 by Gearup380
Emirates Expansion Plans posted Sun Feb 26 2006 22:15:56 by Iloveboeing