Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AA A300 Hard Landing In TUL  
User currently offlineFiveholer From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1015 posts, RR: 13
Posted (16 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 2542 times:

An American Airlines Airbus A300 made a hard landing on a maintenence test flight here in Tulsa this evening......Blew all the tires except those on the nose gear, just talked to my brother, he works on the maint. base out there, came to rest on the intersection of the main runway (18-36) which i believe was closed for some work and runway 8-26 which caused some delays for the other traffic departing and arriving at the airport. Just talked to my brother who is on the base and got an up close look at it, damaged the rims so everything needsd to be replaced, it also dug into the runway a bit......there were 7 crew members on the flight, no one injured. Also just saw on the news about an AA MD-80 that lost an engine or something to that matter on takeoff from San Diego and returned to make a landing at the Naval Air Station, SHEESH!!!!


Bring back Bethune!
5 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlinePurdue Cadet From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (16 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2538 times:

For reference, the MD-80 landed at MCAS Mirimar, which was a naval station until about 1 1/2 years ago. It was home to "Top Gun", the fighter pilot school, until the marines took over.

User currently offlineCedarjet From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 8657 posts, RR: 53
Reply 2, posted (16 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 2536 times:

Was the problem with the MD80 serious? Why didn't they go back to Lindbergh? Surely there's more maintenence facilities etc there? American sure are accident prone these days.

fly Saha Air 707s daily from Tehran's downtown Mehrabad to Mashhad, Kish Island and Ahwaz
User currently offlineDC-10MAN From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (16 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 2536 times:

I saw the A-300 on my way to work. It was quite a site. ADIOS

User currently offlineFlyAA757 From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1031 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (16 years 11 months 1 week 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 2536 times:

Does anyone know what particular a/c was involved?

User currently offlinePurdue Cadet From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (16 years 11 months 1 week 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 2536 times:

The MD-80 suffered a contained turbine failure on takeoff, about 5 seconds off the ground, according to the local (San Diego) news. The aircraft flew to MCAS Mirimar rather than returning to Lindbergh because the Lindbergh approach is difficult. It is over relatively high terrain, so the aircraft remains close to the ground throughout the approach and the final passes right over buildings that the airplanes only clear by 100-200 feet. Rather than attempt to maneuver to final and attempt a difficult approach in the plane's condition, they flew inland to Mirimar (about 15 miles) and landed there. Mirimar is on very flat terrain, and there are no obstacles. The runways are also longer.

The MD-80 is still at Mirimar. AA mechanics are coming to replace the engine, then it will be flown to DFW for further maintenance, as well as for FAA/NTSB review. The FAA has indicated that this is being treated as an isolated incident as contained turbine failures do happen. I remember a Delta MD-80 a few years back that suffered this problem at LGA.

Interestingly, none of the people shown on the news were upset with American or uncomfortable to fly again. They were all pleased with the quality of the crew's response to the situation, and they said that the crew was excellent about disseminating information when they were able to. The passengers were reaccommodated in several ways. Some were rebooked on later flights to DFW on AA or DL, some waited for the same flight the next afternoon, and AA flew in a Super 80 to transport those passengers who wanted to get to DFW that night but were not able to be reaccommodated. The flight was 100% full, with 133 (20F, 113Y) passengers and 6 crew members.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
AA ERJ Emergency Landing In EVV posted Sat Apr 1 2006 18:19:13 by UPSMD11
AA Makes Emergency Landing In Abilene posted Fri Dec 16 2005 16:16:24 by Sleekjet
American A300 Emergency Landing In IAD posted Mon Dec 27 2004 09:33:12 by Hannigan
AA Makes Emergency Landing In Ord posted Wed Nov 3 2004 14:22:20 by Jetjeanes
AA A-300 Hard Landing At JFK posted Fri May 7 2004 04:06:25 by Jfkviaphx
Airliner Makes Hard Landing In Peru posted Sun Dec 14 2003 17:08:08 by Foxecho
AA Emergency Landing In MIA posted Tue Jun 13 2006 18:40:48 by DTWAGENT
AA 757 Performs Emergency Landing In Maracaibo, VE posted Tue Apr 25 2006 23:33:58 by Luisde8cd
AA Emergency Landing In Liberia, Costa Rica posted Fri Sep 9 2005 11:56:21 by RootsAir
A300 Landing In TPA posted Mon Aug 2 2004 02:23:32 by SWA TPA