Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AirNZ 737 Emergency Landing At AKL  
User currently offlineAxio From New Zealand, joined Jul 2006, 319 posts, RR: 0
Posted (8 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 5166 times:

http://tvnz.co.nz/view/page/411749/828589

I assume this was fairly recent given the lack of information.
Anybody at AKL have anything further?

There are a couple of cancellations from AKL on the AirNZ website as well (NZ415 to WLG, NZ517 to CHC). Are these related?

Cheers


Time for a new viewing deck at AKL!
21 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineZkojh From China, joined Sep 2004, 1751 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (8 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 5080 times:

happend this morning, 12 sep NZ time, NZ503 with 94 PAX on board, just read it at work


CZ 787 to AKL can't wait.
User currently offlineFreedom904 From New Zealand, joined Feb 2006, 5 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (8 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 5077 times:

The report suggests it was an under carriage problem i would think the cancelation of the other flights were to check if there are anymore problems with the other 737's.

User currently offlineNZ560 From New Zealand, joined May 2006, 240 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (8 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 4994 times:

Quoting Axio (Thread starter):
There are a couple of cancellations from AKL on the AirNZ website as well (NZ415 to WLG, NZ517 to CHC). Are these related?

According to One News. 4 other flights are affected. I would say this is due to the aircraft not being able to operate the flights. Any idea what the rego is?



-OJL RIP Also to the 7 onboard
User currently offlineNzrich From New Zealand, joined Dec 2005, 1532 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (8 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 4952 times:

I believe it the 737 300 ZK NGJ


"Pride of the pacific"
User currently offlineZKNBX From New Zealand, joined Jul 2006, 464 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (8 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 4784 times:

3 News showed NGJ in the hanger... How did they put the fire out?

User currently offlineNZ1 From New Zealand, joined May 2004, 2285 posts, RR: 25
Reply 6, posted (8 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 4780 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR

Quoting Freedom904 (Reply 2):
The report suggests it was an under carriage problem

I can assure you that it was a little more serious than a small undercarriage problem.

Quoting Nzrich (Reply 4):
I believe it the 737 300 ZK NGJ

Indeed it was NGJ

NZ1


User currently offlinePlanemanofnz From New Zealand, joined Sep 2005, 1676 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (8 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 4756 times:

3 News said that NZ had agreed to an interview but had later declined.

Apparantley there was a problem with the landing gear and the aircraft had to turn back to Auckland but once landed smoke started coming into the cabin from the cockpit. The P/A system was not working so the F/A had to manually tell everyone that they were evacuating via the emergency slides from the doors.

All of this was according to several witnessess who were interviewed on One news.


User currently offlineNZ560 From New Zealand, joined May 2006, 240 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (8 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 4751 times:

Quoting Nzrich (Reply 4):
I believe it the 737 300 ZK NGJ

Thanks for that.  Smile

Quoting NZ1 (Reply 6):

I can assure you that it was a little more serious than a small undercarriage problem.

And I suppose you can not tell us a little bit more?  crossfingers 



-OJL RIP Also to the 7 onboard
User currently offline777ER From New Zealand, joined Dec 2003, 12504 posts, RR: 17
Reply 9, posted (8 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 4751 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR

TVNZ reporter Cameron Bennett was on board the flight. He said "shortly after take off passengers were informed by cabin crew that there was a problem on board. At that point he says the plane made a low descent and headed back to Auckland Airport.

Bennet says the plane made a smooth landing, but the cabin began to fill with smoke as it was taxiing back to the gate.

At that point the captain decided to evacuate passengers and crew via chutes


http://tvnz.co.nz/view/page/411319/828589


User currently offlineZKNBX From New Zealand, joined Jul 2006, 464 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (8 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 4729 times:

Electrical problem - PA not working + smoke on board... how did they put the fire out?

User currently offlineTG992 From New Zealand, joined Jan 2001, 2910 posts, RR: 10
Reply 11, posted (8 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 4729 times:

Quoting Nzrich (Reply 4):
I believe it the 737 300 ZK NGJ

This would be correct.



-
User currently offlineNZ560 From New Zealand, joined May 2006, 240 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (8 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 4722 times:

So this would of meant an over weight landing due to the 733 not being able to dump fuel? Because I have not heard in any reports about them flying around to burn off fuel.


-OJL RIP Also to the 7 onboard
User currently offlineNZ1 From New Zealand, joined May 2004, 2285 posts, RR: 25
Reply 13, posted (8 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 4687 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR

Quoting NZ560 (Reply 12):
So this would of meant an over weight landing due to the 733 not being able to dump fuel?

No it wasn't overweight. The fuel load to CHC is only about 7200kg, max. Well below the max weight for the 733.

Quoting NZ560 (Reply 8):
And I suppose you can not tell us a little bit more?

Not at the moment, no. Ill wait and see what pans out at work tomorrow first. May be able to tell you a bit more tomorrow night.

NZ1


User currently offline777ER From New Zealand, joined Dec 2003, 12504 posts, RR: 17
Reply 14, posted (8 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 4675 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR

Quoting NZ560 (Reply 12):

I would rather land ASAP instead of flying around the dump fuel, maybe the fuel was dumped while heading back?


User currently offlineNZ1 From New Zealand, joined May 2004, 2285 posts, RR: 25
Reply 15, posted (8 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 4653 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR

Quoting 777ER (Reply 14):
maybe the fuel was dumped while heading back?



The 737 does not have fuel jettison capability 777ER.

NZ1


User currently offlineNZ560 From New Zealand, joined May 2006, 240 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (8 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 4653 times:

Quoting NZ1 (Reply 13):

Thanks NZ1. Once again you are very helpful.  Smile



-OJL RIP Also to the 7 onboard
User currently offlineAirnewzealand From New Zealand, joined Oct 2000, 2547 posts, RR: 6
Reply 17, posted (8 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 4639 times:

Great they all got out, and the crew did their job well done!!!

Goes to show that we aernt their just to serve Food and drinks!!!!

Cheers


User currently offlineNZ1 From New Zealand, joined May 2004, 2285 posts, RR: 25
Reply 18, posted (8 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 4630 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR

Quoting Airnewzealand (Reply 17):
Great they all got out, and the crew did their job well done!!!

Yes well done. With reading the trip report, OOR and what has been reported in the media, it seems they did an outstanding job.

NZ1


User currently offlineZKEYE From New Zealand, joined May 2005, 244 posts, RR: 1
Reply 19, posted (8 years 6 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 4331 times:

Quoting NZ1 (Reply 13):
Not at the moment, no. Ill wait and see what pans out at work tomorrow first. May be able to tell you a bit more tomorrow night.

Any update NZ1? I know you may not be able to comment.



Bring out the gimp
User currently offlineNZ1 From New Zealand, joined May 2004, 2285 posts, RR: 25
Reply 20, posted (8 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 4115 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR

Quoting ZKEYE (Reply 19):
Any update NZ1? I know you may not be able to comment.

I can tell you that the root cause was an electrical fault with the Stand-By Power Relay. This caused the Ram-Air inlet doors to remain closed when the aircraft landed, which in turn overheated the packs, causing smoke to fill the cabin.

NZ1


User currently offlineNZ560 From New Zealand, joined May 2006, 240 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (8 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 3964 times:

Very interesting. Thanks for that.  Smile


-OJL RIP Also to the 7 onboard
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Air New Zealand Emergency Landing At AKL posted Sat Jul 10 2004 13:12:45 by Soups
Basiq Air 737 Emergency Landing At Rotterdam posted Sun Jun 13 2004 23:40:51 by Ams
UA 737 Emergency Landing At DSM posted Fri Sep 15 2000 19:35:15 by Cwapilot
QF 737 Makes Emergency Landing At Raaf Base posted Thu Jan 24 2002 09:12:43 by Singapore_Air
AA Emergency Landing At DAB? posted Wed Nov 8 2006 22:24:48 by RL757PVD
Smoke On DE A320 Forces Emergency Landing At HAM posted Thu Nov 2 2006 21:08:52 by LTU932
Southwest 305 Emergency Landing At MDW Today posted Fri Oct 20 2006 15:43:51 by FlyMD
C172 Makes Emergency Landing At Opa Locka posted Tue Sep 19 2006 22:53:05 by AirTranTUS
747 Emergency Landing At EMA posted Mon Sep 11 2006 21:49:36 by EMAlad
Allegiant MD-80 Emergency Landing At CID Injures 2 posted Mon Sep 11 2006 05:38:59 by Iowaman