Albird87 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 8906 times:
I was just wondering why Boeing decided not to build the 777-100 which was a shorter aircraft and desgined for domestic services and also a direct replacement for the L1011s that were in the Delta and Continental fleets. they did get this direct replacement but it was in the form of the 767-400ER. My question is why did they not just stick with the 777-100? I mean both 777 and 767 were in service at this time? was it more about costs or time limits?
Any comments would be great
OyKIE From Norway, joined Jan 2006, 2820 posts, RR: 4
Reply 3, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days ago) and read 8821 times:
As Stitch said, the 777-100 would have been too heavy to become a good airplane. It would probably cost too much lighten up the 777-100 in order to make it competitive in CASM against the 767-400ER.
IIRC Delta and Continental did not need the additional cargo capability on the routes that they wanted the plane for, and therefore they got the cheaper to develop 767-400ER which shares some components with the 777 with similar brakes, and cockpit.
Dream no small dream; it lacks magic. Dream large, then go make that dream real - Donald Douglas
DAL767400ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 8791 times:
Quoting Stitch (Reply 1): As with many "shrinks", the 777-100 would have been too heavy for the mission profiles she was designed for, which raised CASM too high to make her financially viable for most (if not all) operators.
Too true, most shrinks have proven to be real slow-sellers, like the A318, 736 or 747-SP.
Add in in the case of Delta that the 777 has too large of a wingspan to operate from LGA. Being able to fit into L1011/DC-10-sized gates was one of the reasons for DL in choosing the 764 over the 777 for domestic routes.
VerWey said the Boeing 777-100X is an airplane designed in response to airlines' interest in providing direct, non-stop service to new destinations. With greater range, faster cruise speed, more passenger comfort, and better economics than competitive alternatives, the 777-100X could establish new standards in market flexibility including the ability to fly non-stop from the west coast of the United States to Singapore.