Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Delta B777s Recertified For 656,000 Lb Mtow  
User currently offlineDeltaSFO From United States, joined Nov 2000, 2488 posts, RR: 32
Posted (3 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 4861 times:

Not that it's a huge thing, but some users were wondering if and when Delta would bump the MTOW on the B777s up from 648,000 lbs to 656,000 lbs. Effective 9/13/06, all eight aircraft are certified for the higher weight in preparation for the nonstop India services beginning in November.


It's a new day. Every moment matters. Now, more than ever.
13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineVasu From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2005, 2783 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (3 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 4861 times:

What were the criteria for recertifying the aircraft? Were there modifications made?

User currently offlineBucky707 From United States, joined Aug 2000, 1021 posts, RR: 5
Reply 2, posted (3 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 4838 times:

Quoting Vasu (Reply 1):
What were the criteria for recertifying the aircraft? Were there modifications made?

All that happened is they paid Boeing for the higher certification.

User currently offlineWorldTraveler From United States, joined Aug 2003, 6711 posts, RR: 29
Reply 3, posted (3 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 4815 times:

it is necessary for JFKBOM but will increase capabilities on all 777 routes which will increasingly be to/from Asia.

User currently offlineJfk777 From United States, joined Aug 2006, 3337 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (3 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 4762 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I love how Delta JFK to Asia route is to Mumbai, not accross the Pacific. Would love to see JFK to NRT, again.

User currently offlineEvan767 From United States, joined Aug 2005, 2862 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (3 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 4629 times:

Will this mean no weight restrictions on JFK-BOM?


The proper term is "on final" not "on finals" bud...
User currently offlineGigneil From United States, joined Nov 2002, 13883 posts, RR: 88
Reply 6, posted (3 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 4598 times:

Not "no" weight restrictions, as the max payload range of a 777 is far less than the 6800ish nms of this route.

But it will likely fly fairly full of pax and with their bags. Not a lot of cargo but possibly some going east...

N

User currently offlineZKNBX From New Zealand, joined Jul 2006, 464 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (3 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 4125 times:

Gonna be fairly stretched WEST bound I would say... EAST bound not such a problem.

User currently offlineDAL767400ER From Germany, joined Feb 2005, 5434 posts, RR: 54
Reply 8, posted (3 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 3954 times:

Quoting Evan767 (Reply 5):
Will this mean no weight restrictions on JFK-BOM?

No, just less restrictions. Going JFK-BOM, it's probably not that much of an issue thanks to the prevailing tail winds, whereas for BOM-JFK, the increase is more than welcome.


All hail the DemandMedia dictatorship!
User currently offlineQslinger From New Zealand, joined Apr 2006, 198 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (3 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 3630 times:

I am guessing the increased MTOW is for the fuel weight. Am I right?


Raj Koona
User currently offlineDangould2000 From United Kingdom (Scotland), joined Dec 2005, 128 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (3 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 3145 times:

no, MTOW mean the aircraft's MAXIMUM TAKE-OFF WEIGHT meaning it's weight with pax, baggage, fuel etc,


Next Flights:- wherever the airline sends me
User currently offlineVikkyvik From United States, joined Jul 2003, 3764 posts, RR: 26
Reply 11, posted (3 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 2588 times:

Quoting Dangould2000 (Reply 10):
no, MTOW mean the aircraft's MAXIMUM TAKE-OFF WEIGHT meaning it's weight with pax, baggage, fuel etc

I think he was trying to say "the increase in MTOW is due to having to carry more fuel for this long flight."

I would hazard the guess that that is the case.

~Vik


The spirit of Massachusetts is the spirit of America!
User currently offlineQantas744ER From United States, joined Jun 2005, 1173 posts, RR: 6
Reply 12, posted (3 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 2441 times:

Quoting Dangould2000 (Reply 10):
no, MTOW mean the aircraft's MAXIMUM TAKE-OFF WEIGHT meaning it's weight with pax, baggage, fuel etc,

Correct so for example if the plane would need to carry 240Lbs of fuel and only 80,000 of payload (including cargo, pax etc.)

And now it can do with 90,000 of payload

All the figures are fake, only to give you an example

Cheers Leo


If you want to be a Millionaire, start with a billion dollars and launch a new airline.
User currently offlineLostmoon744 From Philippines, joined Aug 2006, 155 posts, RR: 3
Reply 13, posted (3 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 2441 times:

Quoting Jfk777 (Reply 4):
I love how Delta JFK to Asia route is to Mumbai, not accross the Pacific. Would love to see JFK to NRT, again.

hear hear.  bigthumbsup 

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
New Delta Scheme: Habitat For Humanity posted Fri Nov 10 2006 03:22:59 by BigPhilNYC
72MPH Wind Gusts Moves 300.000 Lb Plane posted Fri Aug 4 2006 17:05:16 by DAYflyer
Delta Gets Approval For Atlanta-Leon, Mexico posted Wed Jun 14 2006 14:13:59 by Juventus
Delta/ASA Applies For Nine LAX-Mexico Routes posted Fri Jun 2 2006 14:14:40 by MAH4546
Delta, AirTran Compete For 3 Coveted New Gates posted Wed Mar 8 2006 06:46:33 by Omoo
What Does Delta's Bankruptcy Mean For Song? posted Thu Sep 15 2005 03:10:19 by TacSupport1
Delta Just Filed For Chapter 11! posted Wed Sep 14 2005 22:50:02 by Chiawei
Delta May File For Bankruptcy Wed. posted Mon Sep 12 2005 21:18:34 by Indio66
How Can Delta Avoid Filing For Bankruptcy? posted Fri Aug 26 2005 01:32:06 by Flydl2atl
Delta 767-300 For Lease? posted Sun May 8 2005 02:30:32 by Skibum9