Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
RUMOR: CO Express To Term A At EWR  
User currently offlineJerseyGuy From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 1838 posts, RR: 0
Posted (7 years 7 months 1 week 8 hours ago) and read 5981 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

There is a rumor floating around on Flyertalk that the poster talked to 2 deadheading pilots on different flights who say that CO Express flights will move to A-2 and that all mainline A-2 flights to move to C-2 within 6 months.

Continental has 24 gates in C-2 (where CO-Express operates) but only a possible 14 gates (if current gates were separated to A&B). They are also saying that CO will reduce Express flights once its contract with Expressjet is over but I doubt it will reduce it 10 gates worth. So that would mean that they would need B6s A2 gates to give them a total of 18 AB gates in A-2.

2 questions

1. Where would B6 go if they moved?
2. Why would B6 move to accommodate CO?


Frontier Early Returns Ascent Status| Webmaster of an unoffical TTN page see profile for details
34 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineIkramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21416 posts, RR: 60
Reply 1, posted (7 years 7 months 1 week 8 hours ago) and read 5973 times:

Makes no sense. Would be havoc on connecting pax, especially international connections, where most flights out of A-2 are O&D business flights.


Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlineJerseyGuy From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 1838 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (7 years 7 months 1 week 8 hours ago) and read 5968 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Thats what I thought AND they would need B6s gates and I can't imagine B6 doing CO any favors anytime soon.


Frontier Early Returns Ascent Status| Webmaster of an unoffical TTN page see profile for details
User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16694 posts, RR: 51
Reply 3, posted (7 years 7 months 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 5703 times:

Quoting JerseyGuy (Thread starter):
1. Where would B6 go if they moved?

To Terminal B-1, DL has dropped alot of EWR service over the years. B-1 with NWA, DL and YX is not as busy as it used to be. B6 could easily get three gates at B-1.

Quoting JerseyGuy (Thread starter):
2. Why would B6 move to accommodate CO?

The Port Authority has been reportedly asking B6 to move to B1 for a while.



Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineJFKLGANYC From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 3176 posts, RR: 5
Reply 4, posted (7 years 7 months 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 5696 times:

Don't know about the EWR move, but clearly a LOT of CO EX flying is going to be lost if this deal with ExpressJet goes through.

CO has yet to detail a plain to replace 40+ jets.

I'm assuming that mainline will pick up a lot of lost flying, hence the need for more mainline gates in C and fewer RJ gates in A.

PJ


User currently offlineAvion346 From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 184 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (7 years 7 months 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 5628 times:

CO would HAVE to implement some sort of transfer from A2 to C that doesn't involve re-clearing security. I had to do this on a DCA-EWR-DTW routing and it was definitely a pain. If they allocate those gates to flights with even higher amounts of cnx traffic they really will need a bus transfer or something.

User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16694 posts, RR: 51
Reply 6, posted (7 years 7 months 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 5625 times:

Quoting JFKLGANYC (Reply 4):
CO has yet to detail a plain to replace 40+ jets.

You missed this news:

Quote:

Print Version
Continental Airlines Selects Chautauqua to Operate 44 Regional Jets
HOUSTON, July 21 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Continental Airlines (NYSE: CAL) today announced that it has selected Chautauqua Airlines to provide and operate 44 regional jets as a Continental Express carrier beginning in 2007, under a new capacity purchase agreement.

Chautauqua, a subsidiary of Republic Airways Holdings Inc. (Nasdaq: RJET), will operate 50-seat regional jets on Continental's behalf, under the Continental Express brand. Continental will continue to schedule and market all of its Continental Express regional jet service.

"In selecting Chautauqua, we've identified a regional operator that can uphold our high standards for reliable, quality service, while delivering that service at competitive rates," said Continental Chairman and CEO Larry Kellner.

"We know the Continental team and are delighted to be a part of their network," said Bryan Bedford, chairman, president and CEO of Republic Airways Holdings, parent company of Chautauqua Airlines. "We look forward to providing excellent service to Continental and its customers."

In April 2006, Continental announced that Chautauqua would operate any of the aircraft that ExpressJet Airlines elected to return to Continental under the Continental-ExpressJet capacity purchase agreement. ExpressJet's decision to retain all 69 aircraft provided Continental with the opportunity to examine options for replacing the regional capacity provided by those aircraft. Chautauqua will supply the 44 aircraft that it will operate under the new capacity purchase agreement. Continental currently has no plans to replace 25 of the 69 50-seat regional jets retained by ExpressJet.

Continental Airlines is the world's fifth largest airline. Continental, together with Continental Express and Continental Connection, has more than 3,200 daily departures throughout the Americas, Europe and Asia, serving 154 domestic and 138 international destinations. More than 400 additional points are served via SkyTeam alliance airlines. With more than 43,000 employees, Continental has hubs serving New York, Houston, Cleveland and Guam, and together with Continental Express, carries approximately 61 million passengers per year. Continental consistently earns awards and critical acclaim for both its operation and its corporate culture



Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineStar_world From Ireland, joined Jun 2001, 1234 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (7 years 7 months 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 5625 times:

Quoting Avion346 (Reply 5):
CO would HAVE to implement some sort of transfer from A2 to C that doesn't involve re-clearing security. I had to do this on a DCA-EWR-DTW routing and it was definitely a pain. If they allocate those gates to flights with even higher amounts of cnx traffic they really will need a bus transfer or something.

They already have - there's an airside bus now that goes between the two terminals, it runs every few minutes. They have had this for a few months now.


User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16694 posts, RR: 51
Reply 8, posted (7 years 7 months 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 5616 times:

Continental Connection (CommutAir) is also taking delivery of 16 Q-200s for CLE, there's also the rumors of Continental Connection Q-400s.

http://www.commutair.com/PressReleases/PressRelease20060912-Q200.pdf



Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineDutchjet From Netherlands, joined Oct 2000, 7864 posts, RR: 57
Reply 9, posted (7 years 7 months 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 5605 times:

While the Express to A idea has been considered,the people I have spoken with say its not happening and was never a real possibility:

1. CO Express would need far more space at A than the current CO gates....CO Express uses all of the C2 gates and their are some Express flights to/from Canada that utilize C3.

2. There would be confusion.....most pax dont know whether they are on a CO or CO Express flight.....and many destinations out of EWR are served with a mix of mainline and express flights. It would be a mess.

3. To get more space, JetBlue would have to move out of A......unless the PA forces the issue, JetBlue is not moving.

4. The current set up works just fine......until the new international flights were added, the destinations out of A were primarily O&D.....the new bus service helps connecting pax although I never thought that taking the monorail was such a big deal.

I think that this is one of those idea that sounded good, until it was fully studied and analyzed.

The other big issue at EWR at the moment is international arrivals....unless CO starts revising its schedules, it will have no choice but to use International arrivals at B for some of its European arrivals that arrive EWR between 1130-1330........the C3 gates are getting maxxed out, and with more flights to be added, there is talk that certain flights from certain countries will be assigned to B on a premanent basis.


User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16694 posts, RR: 51
Reply 10, posted (7 years 7 months 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 5579 times:

They should build a elevated enclosed walkway with moving sidwalks to connect the International arrivals hall at Terminal B with the International and Domestic check in levels at Terminal C, CO and the Port Authority was studying building such a walkway prior to 9-11. It would supplement the Airtrain, the distance is about 900ft.

I would go a step further and move DL, NWA, YX to Terminal A and CO could then take over their Terminal B gates making the transfer to Terminal C that much easier. Prior to 9-11 CO had their flights to London Gatwick depart out of Terminal B, maybe Departures from Terminal B to London, Tel Aviv etc is something CO should look into again.



Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineAvion346 From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 184 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (7 years 7 months 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 5500 times:

Quoting Star_world (Reply 7):
They already have - there's an airside bus now that goes between the two terminals, it runs every few minutes. They have had this for a few months now.

Hahaha well that would explain it....my trip was in Dec. 2005. Thanks for the updated information.


User currently offlineCOERJ From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 238 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (7 years 7 months 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 5412 times:

For this to happen two things would need to occur-

Renovation of the A concourse, and check in facilities- which would allow more slots and gates for the large amount of Express aircraft

Mass transfer system between terminals, i.e. express bus that runs every two minutes, underground train, walk way, whatever. The A spider like concourses are very small and do not provide enough room in shops which is something CO is into after looking at C.


User currently offlineB6DC10 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (7 years 7 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 5343 times:

B6 will only move to B1 if they are heavily compensated for the cost of moving, and reimbursed for the 6 figure renovation they did to their space in terminal A. This is not a rumor, Continental has already stated their intentions to the PANYNJ, and to the TSA. Remember, Continental is taking a lot of express flights back to mainline.

User currently offlineDutchjet From Netherlands, joined Oct 2000, 7864 posts, RR: 57
Reply 14, posted (7 years 7 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 5339 times:

Quoting B6DC10 (Reply 13):
Remember, Continental is taking a lot of express flights back to mainline

Where is this idea coming from? 44 of the 69 Expressjet ERJs are being replaced by Chatauqua, there is speculation over the Q400s, and the Commutair upgrade to Q200s was announced this week.


User currently offlineB6DC10 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (7 years 7 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 5332 times:

Quoting Dutchjet (Reply 14):
Where is this idea coming from? 44 of the 69 Expressjet ERJs are being replaced by Chatauqua, there is speculation over the Q400s, and the Commutair upgrade to Q200s was announced this week.

From a Continental Captain I know from his weekly commute....Even though they're bringing in Chatauqua, they are still converting a lot of ERJ flights to 737-500's


User currently offlineDutchjet From Netherlands, joined Oct 2000, 7864 posts, RR: 57
Reply 16, posted (7 years 7 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 5329 times:

Quoting B6DC10 (Reply 15):
From a Continental Captain I know from his weekly commute

I dont want to give you a hard time, but crew is usually the worst source of informaton such as this. The CO 735 fleet is already rather busy, its not as if CO has an extra 25 735s sitting somewhere to replace the ERJs. While there will be some shuffling of mainline and commuter operations.....dont expect any big changes to occur. The Commutair deal announced this week is part of the solution, and more will be disclosed in the coming months.


User currently offlineJerseyGuy From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 1838 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (7 years 7 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 5305 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting B6DC10 (Reply 13):
B6 will only move to B1 if they are heavily compensated for the cost of moving, and reimbursed for the 6 figure renovation they did to their space in terminal A. This is not a rumor, Continental has already stated their intentions to the PANYNJ, and to the TSA. Remember, Continental is taking a lot of express flights back to mainline.

Why would Jetblue do Continental any favors after the climate in EWR?



Frontier Early Returns Ascent Status| Webmaster of an unoffical TTN page see profile for details
User currently offlineCactus739 From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 2430 posts, RR: 31
Reply 18, posted (7 years 7 months 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 5293 times:

Quoting Dutchjet (Reply 16):
I dont want to give you a hard time, but crew is usually the worst source of informaton such as this

Better or worse than here for rumors like this?



You can't fix stupid.... - Ron White
User currently offlineIkramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21416 posts, RR: 60
Reply 19, posted (7 years 7 months 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 5289 times:

Quoting B6DC10 (Reply 15):
From a Continental Captain I know from his weekly commute....Even though they're bringing in Chatauqua, they are still converting a lot of ERJ flights to 737-500's

Captains are bad sources of information.

And converting some ERJ flights to 735 means either more capacity or reduction in frequency on the route. A route that sees 4 ERJs a day could see 2 ERJS and 1 735 and gain 10 seats a day, while DECREASING needed gate space at EWR due to 3 vs. 4 flights. Because CO was already sending some ERJs to C-3 in EWR and using a 737 gate for a smaller jet, by shifting back toward more 737s, they will really be reclaiming mainline gates for mainline flights. (Same holds true for IAH and CLE. Fewer ERJs in terminal C at CLE, fewer ERJs without jetway access at Terminal B (between B and C on the North side)

Converting those 735 flights to 738s (which are arriving monthly) also means more capacity on the route or reduction of frequency. I route with many 735, 73G and 738 flights in a day would see one less 735 (to go to the ERJ route), replaced with a 738, also an increase in capacity on the route.

All CO is doing is looking at routes that can support the shift and doing so. They only need to replace about 15 ERJs worth of capacity, which is 5 738s. CO will take more than 5 738s between the time they announced the loss of the XPress flights and the actual date they lose the net 15 or so flights.

My hope is that CO sees fit to turn a 735 on the IAH-SRQ flight this winter. Not only could they fill it (at least certain days of the week), but it would make rotation easier with the EWR flight.



Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlineDutchjet From Netherlands, joined Oct 2000, 7864 posts, RR: 57
Reply 20, posted (7 years 7 months 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 5285 times:

Quoting JerseyGuy (Reply 17):
Why would Jetblue do Continental any favors after the climate in EWR?

Good question - JetBlue is not going do any "favors" for CO, and likewise. CO is not going go out of its way to help JetBlue,.......BUT, it all depends on the terms of JetBlue's agreement with PANYNJ for the gate space and what provisions are included concerning moving JetBlue. THe PA may have the ""right"" to move Jetblue's location under certain conditions as set forth by the contract.....or maybe they dont? Obviously, the PA is going to do what it can to help CO at EWR (just as the PA would go out of its way to help JetBlue at JFK.....being a major tenant/operator does have its advantages) - at the minimum, I would expect that if JetBlue were to move, the costs of such a move would be covered and the new space to be occupied by JetBlue would have to be atleast as nice as what they are leaving behind.....and JetBlue would not be out of pocket for these expenses. JetBlue spend a good amount of money when it set up housekeeping at EWR...that investment must be protected.


User currently offlineJerseyGuy From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 1838 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (7 years 7 months 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 5278 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Ikramerica (Reply 19):
A route that sees 4 ERJs a day could see 2 ERJS and 1 735 and gain 10 seats a day, while DECREASING needed gate space at EWR due to 3 vs. 4 flights.

It would also help to reduce the delays at EWR that will only get worse as CO continues to add 757 european destinations.



Frontier Early Returns Ascent Status| Webmaster of an unoffical TTN page see profile for details
User currently offlineJerseyGuy From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 1838 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (7 years 7 months 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 5201 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Heres another thing to consider with about whether B6 would want to move to B1, can they get another gate in 2007 if they wanted to start a EWR-Midwest Hub (Rumored: STL) to expand service to the West out of EWR while only operating 2-3 extra flights?


Frontier Early Returns Ascent Status| Webmaster of an unoffical TTN page see profile for details
User currently offlineWesternA318 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 5647 posts, RR: 24
Reply 23, posted (7 years 7 months 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 5099 times:

Quoting JerseyGuy (Thread starter):
1. Where would B6 go if they moved?
2. Why would B6 move to accommodate CO?

B6 would go to B1, and B6 wouldnt help CO, but...it WOULD give CO more room to roam.

Quoting JerseyGuy (Reply 21):
It would also help to reduce the delays at EWR that will only get worse as CO continues to add 757 european destinations.

As opposed to B6's extra 320 flights, or CO's 767/777 routes?



Next trip: SLC-LAX-JFK-LAX-SLC on AA, gotta say goodbye to my beloved 762!
User currently offlineJerseyGuy From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 1838 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (7 years 7 months 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 5037 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting WesternA318 (Reply 23):
B6 would go to B1, and B6 wouldnt help CO, but...it WOULD give CO more room to roam.

Already answered would you please read replies before responding

Quoting STT757 (Reply 3):
To Terminal B-1



Quoting B6DC10 (Reply 13):
B6 will move to B1



Quoting Dutchjet (Reply 20):
Good question - JetBlue is not going do any "favors" for CO, and likewise. CO is not going go out of its way to help JetBlue



Frontier Early Returns Ascent Status| Webmaster of an unoffical TTN page see profile for details
25 WesternA318 : I did read the replies, just adding more salt to the wound
26 STT757 : B6 has been reducing flights at EWR, not growing. They dropped the twice daily TPA flights but brought back (who knows for how long) once daily TPA.
27 COERJ : When B6 originally pulled into EWR i was extemely excited but their fares are not competitive and therefore the only utilization I have gained is the
28 JerseyGuy : Yeah it sure helps when you operate 62% of an airports gates.
29 Dutchjet : Which is not unusual given that EWR is a CO hub......... Now, lets talk about JetBlue's new and expanding terminal at JFK, shall we? How many gates a
30 Tommy767 : What about A-1? United has also dropped service out of EWR over the past few years. i'm sure there are some gates up for grabs there too. And to what
31 Dutchjet : Both UA and DL have more space than they need at EWR for their current level of operations....many thought that more of UA's gates would go to JetBlu
32 Post contains links STT757 : Air Canada just recently moved into A-1, along with Airtran. I think they could fit another smaller carrier like YX into A-1. DL has had the same num
33 Cory6188 : CO might be in need of extra gates in A, but I don't think that they would decide to take gates in Terminal B as well. The current situation is sprea
34 NorthwestEWR : I don't know about that, last time I flew out of EWR ( August 16th, 2006 ) on YX to MKE we left EWR at 630AM and B-1 was PACKED, YX was using B47, NW
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
CO: International To Domestic At EWR posted Fri Feb 29 2008 21:21:59 by Cgagn
CO Moves To Term A At BOS posted Thu May 17 2007 19:48:11 by BAGoldEx
Rumor: CO Express To Get ERJ 170s? posted Sat Nov 13 2004 17:28:50 by COFreqFlyer
Is CO Going To Relocate At GSO? posted Thu Jun 24 2010 18:27:58 by FlyDeltaJets87
CO 764 Gear Collapse At EWR posted Fri Sep 18 2009 08:18:36 by B6Contrails
CO Switching To 777 On EWR/FRA, EWR-FCO In S10 posted Fri Aug 28 2009 07:10:29 by LIPZ
Will CO Move To T1 At Heathrow? posted Mon Oct 13 2008 08:38:40 by 8herveg
CO45/4NOV Mxpewr Arr At Term B At EWR posted Sun Nov 4 2007 10:15:24 by TymnBalewne
CO: Reverting To 764 On EWR-BRU Route? posted Fri Sep 7 2007 02:56:32 by PYP757
Accident Waiting To Happen At EWR posted Wed May 2 2007 16:39:49 by EWRATC
Will CO Move To T1 At Heathrow? posted Mon Oct 13 2008 08:38:40 by 8herveg
CO45/4NOV Mxpewr Arr At Term B At EWR posted Sun Nov 4 2007 10:15:24 by TymnBalewne
CO: Reverting To 764 On EWR-BRU Route? posted Fri Sep 7 2007 02:56:32 by PYP757
Accident Waiting To Happen At EWR posted Wed May 2 2007 16:39:49 by EWRATC