Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Security Breach Grounds Planes At YVR  
User currently offlineCanadianNorth From Canada, joined Aug 2002, 3390 posts, RR: 9
Posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 3531 times:

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/british-col.../2006/09/17/vancouver-airport.html

Quote:
All departing flights at Vancouver International Airport were put on hold for more than two hours Sunday morning after a security guard noticed what appeared to be a prohibited item on the screen of an X-ray machine.

Shouldn't this sort of thing be noticed and decided before the passenger is allowed to leave the security area and head off to his or her gate? So much for being so safe now. I suppose it's better than not doing a re-screening at all; but at the same time I think this whole security thing is a little overkill, and even then if someone really wants to blow up a plane, they're gunna.



CanadianNorth


What could possibly go wrong?
9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCVG2LGA From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 633 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 3418 times:

From my airport security experiences (working it) the ideal situation is to stop the bag a) inside the x-ray chamber and for the bag checker to catch it as the bag exits or b) to stop the x-ray belt soon enough that the bad doesn't reach the end of the cage so the pax can pick it up. But usually there are a**holes reaching up inside the cage to grab their bag because they are late to catch a plane or just impatient. This can result in confusion of which bag was it, and sometimes all the x-ray screener needs is a different view, but with the bag gone, you have to assume the worst and try and find something that may not even be what it is. On the flip side of that last part, sometimes looking at an object the first time it might seem like nothing, but if put through again at another angle or on its side, standing up what have you, there is a totally different view of the questionable object, which hopefully will be identified as a non threat. However if the screener still cannot tell a bag check is the next step. Hope it helps.
Tchau
DA-



They don't call em' emergencies anymore. They call em' Patronies.
User currently offlineAmritpal From Canada, joined Jun 2005, 136 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 3356 times:

i agree... its all for safety...


Lost in Translation
User currently offlineYULWinterSkies From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 2182 posts, RR: 5
Reply 3, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 3214 times:

I see that our country is adopting the same paranoid way as our big Southern friend. Sad.

Quoting CVG2LGA (Reply 1):
But usually there are a**holes reaching up inside the cage to grab their bag because they are late to catch a plane or just impatient. This can result in confusion of which bag was it, and sometimes all the x-ray screener needs is a different view, but with the bag gone, you have to assume the worst and try and find something that may not even be what it is.

I find this behaviour really scary. Knowing one can be arrested for crime by saying the word "bomb" at a check point, I would not put my hands in the detector to attempt to fail the x-ray screening. I would be scared to be also arrested for crime. But people are insane sometimes!



When I doubt... go running!
User currently offlineDTWAGENT From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 1283 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 3181 times:

Hey, after 9/11, I don't care if they have to shut down the airport bacause of security. The more they do this the less likely these dumbies will try anything again in this country.

Chuck


User currently offlineConnector4you From Canada, joined May 2001, 932 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 3094 times:

Quoting DTWAGENT (Reply 4):
don't care if they have to shut down the airport bacause of security

Agree.

Beside the GOOD LOOKING thing, I would suggest CSATA to seriously consider recruiting personnel that served in the military and just forget all together about those internship-programs, part-time, casual or summer jobs.


User currently offlineJayce From Canada, joined Nov 1999, 520 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 1 day ago) and read 3025 times:

I was on a WS 737 on my way to YUL when this happened. We all had to get off the airplane and go through security again. Most of the people were alright with it, but a few were getting pretty upset as if they were the only ones inconvenienced.

I agree, I don't care if they have to shut down the whole airport because of security. Better safe than sorry.



"Trying is the first step towards failure" -Homer Simpson
User currently offlineRobsawatsky From Canada, joined Dec 2003, 597 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 20 hours ago) and read 2942 times:

Quoting DTWAGENT (Reply 4):
Hey, after 9/11, I don't care if they have to shut down the airport bacause of security. The more they do this the less likely these dumbies will try anything again in this country.

Your attitude brings tears of joy to terrorists. They don't have to do anything and massive disruption is generated.


User currently offlineAmritpal From Canada, joined Jun 2005, 136 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (8 years 1 month 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 2839 times:

i heard BA flight 86 (not 100% SURE about number) to LHR was delayed for almost a day cause of this... maybe that flight had to do something with the scare.

[Edited 2006-09-20 23:27:02]

[Edited 2006-09-20 23:34:28]


Lost in Translation
User currently offlineSkySurfer From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2004, 1136 posts, RR: 12
Reply 9, posted (8 years 1 month 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 2822 times:

Not that this is really pertinent, but when going through security i always place my spotting scope on top of my bag so security screeners can see it before it goes through, can see it as it goes through and can see it as it comes out. Even had security in Sydney, Australia try it out! I've never had a problem with that scope ever since i placed it outside my bag at security.

Stu

Ps.....screeners at MAN ALWAYS know exactly what it is and never bat an eyelid! I guess they're used to us MAN spotters!



In the dark you can't see ugly, but you can feel fat
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Third Security Breach At YVR In 10 Days posted Mon Aug 18 2003 21:47:01 by CanadaEH
Security Breach At IAH Yesterday posted Thu Nov 2 2006 17:46:28 by Airlinebuff77
Security Breach At BUR posted Mon Mar 20 2006 06:34:47 by Werdywerd
Severe Security Breach At PDX: Handgun Let Through posted Sun Dec 25 2005 02:38:54 by S12PPL
Security Breach At DTW posted Sun Oct 16 2005 05:01:45 by Dtwclipper
Security Breach At CVG posted Mon Apr 11 2005 12:19:53 by BNA
Worker Alleges Security Breach At SFO posted Wed Feb 23 2005 18:57:04 by Aa777jr
Security Breach At EMA? posted Sat May 22 2004 21:10:34 by Ciro
Security Breach At FLL! posted Sat May 1 2004 22:29:37 by JBLUA320
Major Security Breach At CPH posted Thu Jan 15 2004 15:35:13 by CPH-R