Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Goodnews From Oasis Hong Kong.  
User currently offlineYLWbased From Hong Kong, joined Jan 2006, 830 posts, RR: 4
Posted (7 years 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 5745 times:

Source: Mingpao Daily, Hong Kong

Oasis Hong Kong launched its online ticket sales two weeks ago, and claimed has sold over 10,000 ticket so far through the internet. (that's very impressive)

B-LFA testflight is under going, they are hoping that the flying permit will be granded sometime next week.

BA reduced it's HKG-LHR flight to HKD$4500 return, plus a free one way ticket to any BA european destination city from LHR.


Hong Kong is not China. Not better or worse, just different.
29 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineCloudyapple From Hong Kong, joined Jul 2005, 2454 posts, RR: 9
Reply 1, posted (7 years 12 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 5602 times:

Yeah, all the $1000 sgl tix have gone, the remaining seats are being sold at prices on par with Cathay, Virgin and The Airline. Oasis is not a low cost airline but a lowER cost airline. This sort of pricing structure works in Europe and America but people here are far smarter with their wallets. Thay have had all the fanfare launching their gimmicky $1k price. Nice they have sold those seats out like hot cakes but now they'll have to do better to fill the other 90% of the aircraft.


A310/A319/20/21/A332/3/A343/6/A388/B732/5/7/8/B742/S/4/B752/B763/B772/3/W/E145/J41/MD11/83/90
User currently offlineYLWbased From Hong Kong, joined Jan 2006, 830 posts, RR: 4
Reply 2, posted (7 years 12 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 5555 times:

Quoting Cloudyapple (Reply 1):

disagree, as i heard from my buddy who works for the booking dept of Oasis, flights for the first 3 weeks is already 70% full both Y and J



Hong Kong is not China. Not better or worse, just different.
User currently offlineN754PR From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (7 years 12 months 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 5519 times:

70% for the 1st three weeks, thats rather good!

User currently offlineN503JB From Hong Kong, joined May 2000, 302 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (7 years 12 months 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 5304 times:

Quoting N754PR (Reply 3):
70% for the 1st three weeks, thats rather good!

It's good if based on the load factor but there's any other factor is called "profitable".

Even 100% load factor is doesn't mean the flight is profitable, time will tell how's Oasis idea is work or not.

cheers
N503JB

[Edited 2006-09-22 19:01:09]


HKIA Ramp Spotters
User currently offlineKaddyuk From Wallis and Futuna, joined Nov 2001, 4126 posts, RR: 25
Reply 5, posted (7 years 12 months 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 5281 times:

Quoting Cloudyapple (Reply 1):
Yeah, all the $1000 sgl tix have gone, the remaining seats are being sold at prices on par with Cathay, Virgin and The Airline. Oasis is not a low cost airline but a lowER cost airline. This sort of pricing structure works in Europe and America but people here are far smarter with their wallets. Thay have had all the fanfare launching their gimmicky $1k price. Nice they have sold those seats out like hot cakes but now they'll have to do better to fill the other 90% of the aircraft.

Thats how low cost carriers work... In simple terms... Oasis might figure they can sell 75% of the aircraft at full fare. Rather than let the other 25% of the seats fly empty... they then target the remaining seats at the low fare.

Only they sell the 25% cheaper tickets first and THEN start to bump up the price... Its business and I think they've found a niche in the market...



Whoever said "laughter is the best medicine" never had Gonorrhea
User currently offlineAer Lingus From Ireland, joined Mar 2001, 529 posts, RR: 4
Reply 6, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 5038 times:

As most people know I am not from London and I am at least 380 miles away from London. So I decided to give Oasis Hongkong an e-mail asking if they will they will be codesharing with other airlines. I thought they would reply like Ryanair as Oasis Hongkong calls itself a low cost airline.

''Ryanair is strictly a ’point-to-point’ airline. We therefore do not offer, and cannot facilitate, the transfer of passengers or their baggage to other flights, whether operated by Ryanair or other carriers.You should therefore not book onward flights with Ryanair or indeed with any other air or surface carrier.

Ryanair accepts no responsibility for making connections and therefore will not be liable for any losses or expenses arising out of any failure to achieve a planned connection.

I checked my e-mail today and Oasis Hongkong did reply to my question  Smile

Quote:
Thank you for your email.''

Currently we do not have any codeshare agreements. However, this is
definitely something we will be looking at in the future.

Yours sincerely
Patrick Ling
Oasis Hong Kong Airlines

Way to go Oasis!

Can't wait until they have codeshare agreements with other airlines!

I hope they have codeshare with other airlines by sometime in 2007 or if possible in the coming weeks or months.

Another good news from Oasis Hongkong!

 bigthumbsup 



Split Scimitar or Sharklets?
User currently offlineLuv2fly From United States of America, joined May 2003, 12110 posts, RR: 48
Reply 7, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 4999 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Cloudyapple (Reply 1):
Yeah, all the $1000 sgl tix have gone, the remaining seats are being sold at prices on par with Cathay, Virgin and The Airline. Oasis is not a low cost airline but a lowER cost airline. This sort of pricing structure works in Europe and America but people here are far smarter with their wallets. Thay have had all the fanfare launching their gimmicky $1k price. Nice they have sold those seats out like hot cakes but now they'll have to do better to fill the other 90% of the aircraft.

I have to agree with the above. The thing is now that the cheaper seats are gone, consumers will shop around and tend to be loyal with there favorite airline and to earn FF miles.



You can cut the irony with a knife
User currently offlineKevin777 From Denmark, joined Sep 2006, 1165 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 4836 times:

I don't want to be a party-pooper here, but Oasis Hong Kong have entered a tough marketplace getting tougher. Not only is there BA, CX and VS, but also flights from Aus/NZ, for instance NZ's new AKL-HKG-LHR service. With BA and CX in the same alliance, it would be difficult for Oasis to capture the really golden J and F customers who are used the flexibility offered by BA and CX (I think they've got three daily roundtrips each, right?..). Also, LON-HKG is probably a route where earned FF points far exceed the redeemed ones, and Oasis - although maybe HKG origin focused - will not be able to offer redemptions to exotic places in the Caribbean etc.

Quoting Aer Lingus (Reply 6):
Thank you for your email.''

Currently we do not have any codeshare agreements. However, this is
definitely something we will be looking at in the future.


Way to go Oasis!

Can't wait until they have codeshare agreements with other airlines!
.

Well, code-shares and low(er)-cost operations have yet to go hand in hand.. don't think they should write code-shares (or interlines) off completely, but they should choose their partners very wisely, and not spent tons of resources on getting together codeshare and prorate agreements that feed three Q pax for each flight.

But it's always a joy to see a new airline on the scene of course!! Good luck Oasis!

Kevin777



"I was waiting for you at DFW, but you must have been in LUV" CPH-HAM-CPH CR9
User currently offlineConcorde001 From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2005, 1230 posts, RR: 3
Reply 9, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 4728 times:

Quoting Kevin777 (Reply 8):
it would be difficult for Oasis to capture the really golden J and F customers who are used the flexibility offered by BA and CX (I think they've got three daily roundtrips each, right?..).

oneworld have the follwing flights from LHR to HKG:

12:20 LHR 07:15 HKG QF 0030 744
12:45 LHR 07:25 HKG CX 0252 744
18:20 LHR 13:10 HKG CX 0250 744
18:25 LHR 13:15 HKG BA 0025 747
19:50 LHR 15:05 HKG CX 0256 346
21:15 LHR 16:05 HKG BA 0031 747
22:15 LHR 17:05 HKG BA 0027 747
22:35 LHR 17:50 HKG CX 0254 343

On top of this, you have VS and NZ offering daily flights each, with VS increasing their service to double daily in the near future. I think competition will be fierce for Oasis Hong Kong, but if its cost base is low enough, it could do well.


User currently offlineN754PR From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 4630 times:

VS cancelled their 2nd daily flight. Its gone from the system and people booked on it have been moved to the other flight.

User currently offlineJacobin777 From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 14968 posts, RR: 59
Reply 11, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 4586 times:

Quoting N754PR (Reply 10):
VS cancelled their 2nd daily flight. Its gone from the system and people booked on it have been moved to the other flight.

Any particular reason?



"Up the Irons!"
User currently offlineWedgetail737 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 5910 posts, RR: 6
Reply 12, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 4566 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I'm just waiting for Oasis to announce more routes. Or I should say, launch more routes.

User currently offlineN754PR From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 4449 times:

Dont know why VS cancelled... but thats what I've seen in this forum.

User currently onlineAeroWesty From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 20640 posts, RR: 62
Reply 14, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 days ago) and read 4412 times:

Quoting Kevin777 (Reply 8):
I don't want to be a party-pooper here, but Oasis Hong Kong have entered a tough marketplace getting tougher.

It's my belief that the connection carriers will see the market get tougher, and that Oasis will draw mainly from that pool. Why connect in DXB, AUH, BKK, SIN, ICN, etc. at a higher price when you can fly a 747 non-stop?

Quoting Kevin777 (Reply 8):
With BA and CX in the same alliance, it would be difficult for Oasis to capture the really golden J and F customers

It's not apparent that those are the passengers Oasis is targeting, and I highly doubt you'll see many of those flyers switch. Their business class fares are priced for those who would probably be flying in premium economy or highly-discounted business class. That's also reflected in the cabin setup. You don't see lie-flat sleeper seats in their business class.

To assume that Oasis will be going head-to-head with the large network carriers product-for-product may be in error.



International Homo of Mystery
User currently offlineKevin777 From Denmark, joined Sep 2006, 1165 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 4337 times:

Quoting Concorde001 (Reply 9):
oneworld have the follwing flights from LHR to HKG:

12:20 LHR 07:15 HKG QF 0030 744
12:45 LHR 07:25 HKG CX 0252 744
18:20 LHR 13:10 HKG CX 0250 744
18:25 LHR 13:15 HKG BA 0025 747
19:50 LHR 15:05 HKG CX 0256 346
21:15 LHR 16:05 HKG BA 0031 747
22:15 LHR 17:05 HKG BA 0027 747
22:35 LHR 17:50 HKG CX 0254 343

On top of this, you have VS and NZ offering daily flights each, with VS increasing their service to double daily in the near future. I think competition will be fierce for Oasis Hong Kong, but if its cost base is low enough, it could do well.

Thank you! Forgot about QF... even though VS have cancelled their 2nd roundtrip (maybe because of Oasis??), there is still a lot of competition.

Don't really know how low their cost base can be compared to BA, CX etc.; flying long-haul dilutes many traditional LCC advantages, and Oasis - as far as I know - is not going to be a Ryanair-747. I think they're in for a tough one.

Quoting AeroWesty (Reply 14):
It's my belief that the connection carriers will see the market get tougher, and that Oasis will draw mainly from that pool. Why connect in DXB, AUH, BKK, SIN, ICN, etc. at a higher price when you can fly a 747 non-stop?

Agree that they will try to take a lot from that pool, and I agree that nonstop with Oasis is preferred to onestop with e.g. EK. However, what is the traditional response by 6th freedom carriers when someone starts a nonstop service? Beating them on the fares. With EK, QR and EY having bought enough widebodies to accomodate half the worlds population simultaneously, I think Oasis could be in for a tough battle for the price-sensitive travellers.

Quoting AeroWesty (Reply 14):
To assume that Oasis will be going head-to-head with the large network carriers product-for-product may be in error.

Well, I agree that the service concepts are different etc., but it's not black-and-white, that is, no competition between Oasis and the others OR head-to-head. History has not been kind to low-cost long-haul ops; the "big ones" have always fighted back seriously, and more than often won (though maybe using dirty tricks, however, sadly these are difficult tu put up with...)

Anybody got the abbreviation for Oasis by the way???

Kevin777



"I was waiting for you at DFW, but you must have been in LUV" CPH-HAM-CPH CR9
User currently offlineBlueFlyer From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 4000 posts, RR: 2
Reply 16, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 4311 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Kevin777 (Reply 15):
Anybody got the abbreviation for Oasis by the way???

O8/OHK



I've got $h*t to do
User currently onlineAeroWesty From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 20640 posts, RR: 62
Reply 17, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 4104 times:

Quoting Kevin777 (Reply 15):
History has not been kind to low-cost long-haul ops; the "big ones" have always fighted back seriously, and more than often won

Okay, let's talk apples to apples. Name the low-cost long-haul airlines that have failed. I can think of one off-hand, Laker. How many can you list?



International Homo of Mystery
User currently offlineBlueFlyer From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 4000 posts, RR: 2
Reply 18, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 4094 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting AeroWesty (Reply 17):

Citybird



I've got $h*t to do
User currently onlineAeroWesty From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 20640 posts, RR: 62
Reply 19, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 4058 times:

Quoting BlueFlyer (Reply 18):
Citybird

Okay, I found an old thread on Citybird. Sounds like they were a disaster from day one.

What Would CityBird Have Been Like? (by L.1011 Aug 4 2003 in Civil Aviation)



International Homo of Mystery
User currently offlineKevin777 From Denmark, joined Sep 2006, 1165 posts, RR: 1
Reply 20, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 4058 times:

Quoting AeroWesty (Reply 17):
Okay, let's talk apples to apples. Name the low-cost long-haul airlines that have failed. I can think of one off-hand, Laker. How many can you list?

Off the top of my head:

Tower Air

PeopleExpress should never have entered long-haul

Canada 3000 shouldn't have either

SWE FLY

I'm sure there are more

Also, basically there aren't nearly as many market opportunities in longhaul VS shorthaul markets; mainly because long-haul competition many times is fierce enough between the legacy airlines.

Kevin777



"I was waiting for you at DFW, but you must have been in LUV" CPH-HAM-CPH CR9
User currently offlineCornish From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2005, 8187 posts, RR: 54
Reply 21, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 4023 times:

Quoting AeroWesty (Reply 14):
Quoting Kevin777 (Reply 8):
I don't want to be a party-pooper here, but Oasis Hong Kong have entered a tough marketplace getting tougher.

It's my belief that the connection carriers will see the market get tougher, and that Oasis will draw mainly from that pool. Why connect in DXB, AUH, BKK, SIN, ICN, etc. at a higher price when you can fly a 747 non-stop?

And this is exactly a key market that Oasis is targetting.

Quoting AeroWesty (Reply 14):
Quoting Kevin777 (Reply 8):
With BA and CX in the same alliance, it would be difficult for Oasis to capture the really golden J and F customers

It's not apparent that those are the passengers Oasis is targeting, and I highly doubt you'll see many of those flyers switch. Their business class fares are priced for those who would probably be flying in premium economy or highly-discounted business class. That's also reflected in the cabin setup. You don't see lie-flat sleeper seats in their business class.

 checkmark  Exactly right. They know damn well they're not going to pick up BA and CX's golden passengers. But they do believe there is a market for cost concious travellers on the route - ones who simply don't collect FF miles, of whcih there are rather more in the world than some people seem to think. There is a large potential market in the Pearl River Delta that they are chasing too. With increased Chinese travel, and the huge market in language students to the UK, they may well find themselves a good little niche there. They are also doing some smart work with HongKong travel agents, for which CX is unlikely to respond (or at least i'd be surprised).

Quoting Aer Lingus (Reply 6):
So I decided to give Oasis Hongkong an e-mail asking if they will they will be codesharing with other airlines.

While not codesharing in the full sense, they are looking for some smaller agrements with a few LCCs, and flying to LGW and later CGN and OAK they envisage being able to offer some connections (short of a full interline or codeshare deal) with a couple of LCCs. Another they are looking at is to do the dsame to the Philippines from HongKong, especially as there are no direct flight between the UK and the Philippines.

Quoting AeroWesty (Reply 17):
Name the low-cost long-haul airlines that have failed. I can think of one off-hand, Laker. How many can you list?

Would Tower Air be another? - or were they actually full service.

Oasis have put together a sound business idea from what I've seen and heard. Whether they will be able to make it a success, only time will tell. They know there is a risk going up against the big boys, but one of those of course is Virgin Atlantic, and they are fully aware of how they started out and where they got to today  Smile



Just when I thought I could see light at the end of the tunnel, it was some B*****d with a torch bringing me more work
User currently onlineAeroWesty From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 20640 posts, RR: 62
Reply 22, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 4023 times:

Quoting Kevin777 (Reply 20):
Tower Air

PeopleExpress should never have entered long-haul

Canada 3000 shouldn't have either

SWE FLY

Okay, great list, but of the airlines I'm familiar with, Tower and PeoplExpress, neither can be directly related to Oasis. How many high-volume high-profile routes did those airlines fly? I know PE flew EWR-LGW as one, for example. (I'm not trying to be a pain in the butt about this, but I'd like to see if Oasis is merely repeating history, or if they are indeed something completely new and different.)

Also, PeoplExpress never "failed". It was bought out by Continental, who now operates their very successful EWR hub as a result of that purchase.



International Homo of Mystery
User currently onlineAeroWesty From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 20640 posts, RR: 62
Reply 23, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 4013 times:

Quoting Cornish (Reply 21):
There is a large potential market in the Pearl River Delta that they are chasing too. With increased Chinese travel, and the huge market in language students to the UK, they may well find themselves a good little niche there.

Didn't I read somewhere that the dynamics of their potential pool of UK-based flyers somewhat different as well, flying out of Gatwick vs. Heathrow? I think that was in one of the past threads about Oasis.



International Homo of Mystery
User currently offlineCPDC10-30 From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2000, 4781 posts, RR: 23
Reply 24, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 3997 times:

Quoting Kevin777 (Reply 20):
Canada 3000 shouldn't have either

I beg to differ on that. They only started to run into trouble when they started expanding their domestic flights after acquiring Royal and CanJet. The 340 flight to India would have probably been succesful if they hadn't waited so long.

Here's hoping that Oasis does get codeshares set up...I would be very interested in flying them soon. LGW is a pain to get to on the train from Manchester...a codeshare with Jet2 perhaps would be fantastic.


25 Cornish : Well citybird is a poor example really. They weren't really driven off the market due to the strength of competition - BRU has always been a weak tra
26 Post contains images Cornish : yep - as i've just answered in the post above
27 BCAL : It is debatable whether or not Laker (the 'Skytrain' Laker) failed. True they had a severe cash crisis that led to the banks calling in a Receiver to
28 AeroWesty : Excellent summary on Laker, thank you. As has been pointed out before, Oasis isn't necessarily going after the CX/BA flyers, but growing the market a
29 Post contains images Kevin777 : OK OK..... I know that SWE FLY and Tower Air might not be the best airlines to compare Oasis to. Also, others were in different contexts as well, espe
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Oasis Hong Kong To Germany? posted Tue Oct 31 2006 10:09:06 by Thorben
Oasis Hong Kong - The Real Deal? posted Fri Oct 20 2006 21:12:36 by Gh123
New Airline: Oasis Hong Kong Airliners posted Wed Sep 20 2006 03:21:59 by Legallykev
Oasis Hong Kong's Confirmed Livery posted Mon Sep 18 2006 08:00:58 by YLWbased
Oasis Hong Kong Airlines ~ Booking? posted Sat Aug 5 2006 10:51:58 by Dogfighter2111
Oasis Hong Kong - Low-cost Goes Long-haul! posted Wed Jul 5 2006 12:44:38 by BDKLEZ
Oasis Hong Kong ... What 744's They Getting? posted Mon Jun 19 2006 11:21:24 by N754PR
Oasis Hong Kong Airlines - Developments & A/C posted Thu Mar 16 2006 17:12:55 by B742
Oasis Hong Kong Airlines Delays Launch posted Thu Mar 2 2006 20:12:14 by YLWbased
Oasis Hong Kong Airlines To Fly To London Gatwick posted Mon Nov 28 2005 01:10:07 by Firipu