Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AA And Their A300 Replacement - 787-3 Possible?  
User currently online1337Delta764 From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 6493 posts, RR: 2
Posted (7 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 4018 times:

Many have told me that Delta will not order the 787-3 as a replacement for their non-ER 767-300s, but convert some 767-300ERs to domestic as 787-8s and 787-9s enter international service.

What about AA's A300 replacement? None of the routes served by AA's A300s require the range of the 787-8, and on the routes served by the A300, cargo is in high demand. The 767-300 has less cargo space than the A300. The 787-3 may be the perfect replacement for the A300 fleet. What are your thoughts on this?


The Pink Delta 767-400ER - The most beautiful aircraft in the sky
11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDank From United States of America, joined Jul 2006, 894 posts, RR: 15
Reply 1, posted (7 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 3949 times:

Quoting 1337Delta764 (Thread starter):
What about AA's A300 replacement? None of the routes served by AA's A300s require the range of the 787-8, and on the routes served by the A300, cargo is in high demand. The 767-300 has less cargo space than the A300. The 787-3 may be the perfect replacement for the A300 fleet. What are your thoughts on this?

But range = higher cargo. One of the big limitations of the 787-3 is that it cannot lift max payload at max range (it does one or the other). Which means that on the longer legs, the 787-3 will not be able to carry the lucrative cargo. I could easily see someone like AA saying that they will slightly abuse some 787-8s on some of these routes and use 763s that have been reassigned for the lower cargo and passenger demand routes. This also allows AA to reassign 787-8s (with appropriate pax configuration changes) when they need/want to.

cheers.


User currently offlinePRAirbus From Puerto Rico, joined Apr 2005, 1137 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (7 years 11 months 1 week 3 days ago) and read 3784 times:

AA just extended the AB6 leases for another 2 years meaning they'll be around for a while longer at least past 2010.

User currently offline777ER From New Zealand, joined Dec 2003, 12114 posts, RR: 18
Reply 3, posted (7 years 11 months 1 week 3 days ago) and read 3774 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR

Quoting PRAirbus (Reply 2):
AA just extended the AB6 leases for another 2 years meaning they'll be around for a while longer at least past 2010.

Which means they will be in service intill around the time the B787 is in airline service. AA might extend the leases for another two years till 2012, thats when the B787 line is booked out till. Unless AA can source some early production slots


User currently offlineJfk777 From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 8341 posts, RR: 7
Reply 4, posted (7 years 11 months 1 week 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 3734 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

AA should misuse 787-9 like the Asians misuse their 744 and 777's. Singapore call it, "intelligent misuse" of say a A345 from Singapore to Jakarta. ANA does it with 747-400D in domestic use when they are new for 4 years ands then they put a 3 class interior and you it for long haul routes.

User currently offlineMCIGuy From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 1936 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (7 years 11 months 1 week 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 3718 times:

The 783 is intended to be a niche aircraft for the Asian market. I still say none will be sold here, at least for a long time to come.


Airliners.net Moderator Team
User currently offlineFXramper From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 7268 posts, RR: 85
Reply 6, posted (7 years 11 months 1 week 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 3718 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

The AB6 will be around for AA. The 787 they order will replace 762 that fly transcon.

Regards.


User currently offlineAkizidy214 From Jamaica, joined Sep 2006, 408 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (7 years 11 months 1 week 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 3621 times:

AA is real big on simplification right now. Most likely they will only order the 787-9 and put a majority of them on the east coast MIA, JFK and SJU. That will give them the flexibility to move the 777's to DFW, ORD and LAX.


DCA
User currently offlineShenzhen From United States of America, joined Jun 2003, 1710 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (7 years 11 months 1 week 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 3612 times:

If AA intend on using the airplanes until they are retired, then they might purchase the -3. If they want to re-sale, they better pick the -8

Cheers


User currently offlineAkizidy214 From Jamaica, joined Sep 2006, 408 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (7 years 11 months 1 week 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 3569 times:

Quoting Shenzhen (Reply 8):
If they want to re-sale, they better pick the -8

AA isn't in the business to re-sale. The 787-8 could in no way way replace the A300. In a AA configuration the 787-8 would be a huge decrease in available seats. Don't forget the A300's hold 267 passengers and most of the time those flights are filled to the rim and often over sold.



DCA
User currently offlineBrendows From Norway, joined Apr 2006, 1020 posts, RR: 4
Reply 10, posted (7 years 11 months 1 week 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 3534 times:

Quoting Akizidy214 (Reply 9):
n a AA configuration the 787-8 would be a huge decrease in available seats. Don't forget the A300's hold 267 passengers

How can a 788 represent a decrease in capacity when it's larger than the A306? In a two class config, the 788 can seat about 280-295 pax.
The number Boeing use for seating (210-250) is for long haul, something the flights to and from the Caribbean aren't.


User currently offlineDank From United States of America, joined Jul 2006, 894 posts, RR: 15
Reply 11, posted (7 years 11 months 1 week 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 3534 times:

Quoting Akizidy214 (Reply 9):
AA isn't in the business to re-sale. The 787-8 could in no way way replace the A300. In a AA configuration the 787-8 would be a huge decrease in available seats. Don't forget the A300's hold 267 passengers and most of the time those flights are filled to the rim and often over sold.

Then AA better not buy a 787-3 since it shares identical cabin dimensions to the -8... A -3/8 would most likely seat a little more than the a300 with a similar mix of seats and one of the two is the likely replacement for some of their a300s. I think a mix of -8s and -9s are most likely for AA.

cheers.

[Edited 2006-09-26 23:40:27]

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
AA And The A300 posted Sat Oct 1 2005 19:34:25 by MFEFlyer
AA And The A300 posted Sun Nov 21 2004 23:44:43 by Aa777jr
AA And Their Spelling posted Thu Oct 21 2004 06:37:29 by Flybyguy
Possible 787s For AA And UA posted Mon Oct 30 2006 17:12:40 by 1337Delta764
AA And 787 And 380 posted Fri Nov 11 2005 16:22:27 by FlyMeToTheMoon
AA To Pull A300's And 738's Out Of BOS posted Tue May 3 2005 05:51:15 by Aa777flyer
AA A300 Replacement? posted Wed May 12 2004 17:19:16 by Asianguy767
AA A300 Replacement? posted Wed Jan 28 2004 06:18:27 by AA767400
AA's 738s And Their Video Monitors... posted Sun Nov 9 2003 05:08:06 by Flyboy80
Flying AA And BA In Biz Class: Lounge Access? posted Thu Oct 26 2006 16:42:50 by Coal