Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Star Ratings For Airlines  
User currently offlineMarcelduchamp From New Zealand, joined Sep 2000, 87 posts, RR: 0
Posted (15 years 7 months 3 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 1545 times:

I've just been surfing through airlinequality.com, and despite an incomplete and messily designed website, I find their rating system and objectives interesting. There are some ratings though, that I find unusual. While they speak of a methodology, I thought I would give my 2 cents worth on how I would PERSONALLY rate airlines based purely on my IMPRESSIONS and experiences...

- These are entirely personal impressions and/or experience-based.
- I have to say that I have only flown on about 20 of the carriers below, therefore an airline's reputation/branding is what used.
- I decided to base my list on these aspects...
(1) SERVICE (2) SAFETY (3) FLEET/CABIN AMENITIES(4) REPUTATION:basically word-of-mouth and awards (5) BRANDING:living in the Asia/Pacific, airlines far away obviously have to work harder...
- I take "3 STARS" as the average/median. It would be where the bulk of airlines are, IN MY HUMBLE OPINION. Therefore, the airlines I am listing are those which I FEEL are "above average". Certain airlines I've flown like Air Pacific, American and Iberia certainly do not make the cut.

*listed in alphabetical order

5 STARS (7 carriers)

Ansett Australia (International)
Cathay Pacific Airways
Lauda Air
Singapore Airlines
Virgin Atlantic

4.5 STARS (3 carriers)

Air New Zealand
British Airways
Qantas Airways

4 STARS (10 carriers)

Air France
All Nippon Airways
Japan Airlines
Midwest Express
Scandinavian Airlines
South African Airways
Thai Airways

3.5 STARS (9 carriers)

Aer Lingus
Air Canada/Canadian
Alaskan Airlines
Austrian Airlines
British Midland
Continental Airlines
Gulf Air
Malaysian Airlines

I have not included regional carriers like Crossair, SilkAir or Tyrolean (even though Wallpaper* magazine cites it as a rather nifty little airline). As for Royal Brunei and Sabena, I just couldn't decide whether to include them.

I repeat that...(1) This is NOT a scientific theory and do not mean to force this down anyone's throat. (2) This list is not exhaustive. The carriers listed are those that I feel have an above-average standard. (3) PLEASE give me your contrasting views and arguments. I really want to hear what YOUR "best airlines" are.


2 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineMx5_boy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (15 years 7 months 3 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 1510 times:

Nice to see AN is no#1.


User currently offlineCV990A From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 1479 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (15 years 7 months 3 weeks 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 1492 times:

Despite their accident yesterday, I've always found AeroMexico's service to be excellent, both in Coach and their First/Business Class.

Kittens Give Morbo Gas
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
CXA And Star Competing For Chinese Airlines posted Thu May 24 2001 09:17:27 by Singapore_Air
LAX Doubles Rent For Airlines. posted Tue Nov 21 2006 18:12:03 by Laxintl
Trend Colours 2008: Food For Airlines? posted Wed Nov 15 2006 01:55:03 by OwlEye
Ipod Integration For Airlines posted Tue Nov 14 2006 18:29:34 by Ffis34
A380 Here To Stay-Great Bargain For Airlines! posted Fri Nov 10 2006 02:02:49 by OU812
Why It Makes Sense For Airlines To Keep The A380 posted Wed Sep 27 2006 05:06:27 by WingedMigrator
Most Profitable 747 Routes For Airlines? posted Mon Aug 21 2006 09:37:01 by QXatFAT
Question About The Cost Of Insurance For Airlines posted Thu May 11 2006 03:14:52 by Scalebuilder
Star XL German Airlines posted Tue May 2 2006 12:18:48 by Sokol
The A380 Update - More Interesting For Airlines? posted Mon Apr 24 2006 14:41:27 by OyKIE