Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Star Ratings For Airlines  
User currently offlineMarcelduchamp From New Zealand, joined Sep 2000, 87 posts, RR: 0
Posted (14 years 2 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 1115 times:

I've just been surfing through airlinequality.com, and despite an incomplete and messily designed website, I find their rating system and objectives interesting. There are some ratings though, that I find unusual. While they speak of a methodology, I thought I would give my 2 cents worth on how I would PERSONALLY rate airlines based purely on my IMPRESSIONS and experiences...

- These are entirely personal impressions and/or experience-based.
- I have to say that I have only flown on about 20 of the carriers below, therefore an airline's reputation/branding is what used.
- I decided to base my list on these aspects...
(1) SERVICE (2) SAFETY (3) FLEET/CABIN AMENITIES(4) REPUTATION:basically word-of-mouth and awards (5) BRANDING:living in the Asia/Pacific, airlines far away obviously have to work harder...
- I take "3 STARS" as the average/median. It would be where the bulk of airlines are, IN MY HUMBLE OPINION. Therefore, the airlines I am listing are those which I FEEL are "above average". Certain airlines I've flown like Air Pacific, American and Iberia certainly do not make the cut.

*listed in alphabetical order

5 STARS (7 carriers)

Ansett Australia (International)
Cathay Pacific Airways
Emirates
Lauda Air
Singapore Airlines
Swissair
Virgin Atlantic

4.5 STARS (3 carriers)

Air New Zealand
British Airways
Qantas Airways

4 STARS (10 carriers)

Air France
All Nippon Airways
EVA Air
Japan Airlines
KLM
Lufthansa
Midwest Express
Scandinavian Airlines
South African Airways
Thai Airways

3.5 STARS (9 carriers)

Aer Lingus
Air Canada/Canadian
Alaskan Airlines
Austrian Airlines
British Midland
Continental Airlines
Finnair
Gulf Air
Malaysian Airlines

I have not included regional carriers like Crossair, SilkAir or Tyrolean (even though Wallpaper* magazine cites it as a rather nifty little airline). As for Royal Brunei and Sabena, I just couldn't decide whether to include them.

I repeat that...(1) This is NOT a scientific theory and do not mean to force this down anyone's throat. (2) This list is not exhaustive. The carriers listed are those that I feel have an above-average standard. (3) PLEASE give me your contrasting views and arguments. I really want to hear what YOUR "best airlines" are.

CIAO...

2 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineMx5_boy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (14 years 2 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 1080 times:

Nice to see AN is no#1.

mb


User currently offlineCV990A From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 1424 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (14 years 2 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 1062 times:

Despite their accident yesterday, I've always found AeroMexico's service to be excellent, both in Coach and their First/Business Class.


Kittens Give Morbo Gas
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
CXA And Star Competing For Chinese Airlines posted Thu May 24 2001 09:17:27 by Singapore_Air
LAX Doubles Rent For Airlines. posted Tue Nov 21 2006 18:12:03 by Laxintl
Trend Colours 2008: Food For Airlines? posted Wed Nov 15 2006 01:55:03 by OwlEye
Ipod Integration For Airlines posted Tue Nov 14 2006 18:29:34 by Ffis34
A380 Here To Stay-Great Bargain For Airlines! posted Fri Nov 10 2006 02:02:49 by OU812
Why It Makes Sense For Airlines To Keep The A380 posted Wed Sep 27 2006 05:06:27 by WingedMigrator
Most Profitable 747 Routes For Airlines? posted Mon Aug 21 2006 09:37:01 by QXatFAT
Question About The Cost Of Insurance For Airlines posted Thu May 11 2006 03:14:52 by Scalebuilder
Star XL German Airlines posted Tue May 2 2006 12:18:48 by Sokol
The A380 Update - More Interesting For Airlines? posted Mon Apr 24 2006 14:41:27 by OyKIE