ZschocheImages From United States of America, joined Sep 2006, 149 posts, RR: 0 Posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 5000 times:
I was thinking today about the GOL crash last week and how the airline will be affected. Some things that I came up with:
- New scheduling conflicts. With the new plane came increased frequencies on certain routs. Until the plane is replaced, they will need to rework part of their schedule.
- Bad publicity for the airline. We still don't know who was at fault (pilots, equipment and so on), but even if it was the Legacy's fault, GOL has the blemish in the consumer's eye.
- Company wide distractions. Rather than continue to focus on company growth and public relations, they now will need to devote time and resources to finding out what happened, and make things right.
- Distress within the company. Employees of the company, especially the top officials will be left forever with the thought the the company that they worked for was involved in the deaths of 155 people.
These were the ones I could think off the top of my head. I'm sure that these are the same for every crash, which is a shame. My thoughts and prayers are with the vicims and their families of this crash and all crashes.
Dampfnudel From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 83 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 4953 times:
ValuJet merged with another company in 1997 and was renamed AirTran (thanks in part to the May 1996 crash). TWA and Pan Am were already in a downward spiral and those events just accelerated that process.
OPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 4921 times:
Quoting UAL757 (Reply 2): Didn't Valujet shutdown after the everglades crash?
They did, for awhile...
An accident can really knock the wind out of an airline's sails, especially if the airline involved already has other problems ongoing, and in addition to the TW800/TW and PA103/PA examples, you can add Air Florida's flight 90 as another example.
I think the eventual degree of "forgiveness" that the traveling public gives an airline is in part determined by how much they liked the airline to begin with, and how much they think (rightly or not) the airline's actions were to "blame" in the accident. In the case of the Legacy/GOL, if (and I want to stress "if" purely for the sake of example) the investigation determined that GOL was at fault, folks might be less forgiving than if the Legacy was at fault and GOL was a victim of that.
Based on what I've heard/read of the way that GOL has been handling things (excellent), that also leaves a positive impression on folks. I think they'll be fine...
Zippyjet From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 5355 posts, RR: 13
Reply 8, posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 4907 times:
Depends on the airline, and the country. The news media can make or brake an airline's future. With the GOL tragic crash, it had very little press time here in the states because of two national stories that dealt with sexual deviant behavior.
Tragic mass murder at the Amish school. The nutcase tuned out to be a perv dealing with molestation issues from back in the day. He abused two young girls in his family. Then massacared innocent school girls because of this.
The holier than though GOP Florida congressman who had a thing for underage boy congressional pages.
Now, if this air disaster was stateside and the other two stories were non-existant, the press would do their spin and hound the airline disaster story to the point of saturation.
F9Animal From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 4920 posts, RR: 29
Reply 9, posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 4828 times:
Quoting Dampfnudel (Reply 5): ValuJet merged with another company in 1997 and was renamed AirTran (thanks in part to the May 1996 crash). TWA and Pan Am were already in a downward spiral and those events just accelerated that process.
The crashes did not help the financial problems for TWA and Pan Am. Valujet was doomed after 592 went down. Their only option was to change their names, and try and rid the horrible publicity they got from it.
OB1504 From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 3207 posts, RR: 7
Reply 10, posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 4801 times:
For the record, ValuJet voluntarily ceased operations. They did so after realizing that it would be harder for them to get things back to normal if they had to shut down as a result of an FAA mandate, especially because they had already prohibited ValuJet from increasing its fleet or network.
They merged with a small charter outfit named AirTran that flying 737-200s based out of Orlando. ValuJet kept the AirTran name and introduced a new livery.
Sabretech, the company that supplied the canisters (and packaged them improperly) was taken to trial, and was indicted on 110 counts of manslaughter and 110 counts of third-degree murder. They went out of business in 1999, but court proceedings didn't end until 2001.
Another crash that one could argue killed an airline was that of AeroPeru's flight 603 in the Pacific Ocean. The airline permanently ceased operations in 1999. I flew on the aircraft only a few weeks before it crashed.
Cessna057 From United States of America, joined Sep 2006, 439 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 4776 times:
Quoting Planesailing (Reply 1): I hate to say it, but I would suspect this kind of thing is planned for.
I agree with you but it is very hard to totaly prepare for a crash.
Take the GOL for example. They may have prepared, but still they lost an aircraft which was bought for what $30m with 220 hours on the airframe. Also they have publicity because people always thing "oh well it happened once it will happen again", so they have to convince people its safe again.
Hold it . . . Hold it . . . HOLD THE FREAKIN NOSE UP!!
Jetdeltamsy From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 2986 posts, RR: 8
Reply 13, posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 4703 times:
Quoting UAL757 (Reply 2): Didn't Valujet shutdown after the everglades crash?
Quoting Planesailing (Reply 3): Not sure they shut down, but didn't they get their rear kicked for carrying oxygen cannisters?
ValuJet WAS shutdown by the federal government. They had to completely overhaul their maintenance and operating standards. The merger with AirTran was one in which a non-operating carrier, ValuJet, purchased an operating carrier, Airtran. It was done so they could quickly change their name to disassociate themselves with the ValuJet brand, which had been pretty much destroyed in the press.
Absolutely correct. As indicated in other posts, both were in a downward spiral at the time of the accidents, but these occurrences caused a dramatic shift by travelers away from these two airlines. They were seen as "targets" and high-revenue business and a steady flow of government travelers simply booked other airlines. Pan Am 103 probably did more to kill Pan Am than did TWA 800's accident. TWA had more potential for recovery at the time of that accident than did Pan Am. Pan Am was practically a corpse at the time of 103. If you don't know anything about airlines, know this...because of the tremendous cash flows airlines generate, they can continue to operate long after their viability as an on-going concern has past. That was the case with Pan Am...they were already dead. TWA had tremendous merger potential with it's fairly large (at the time) domestic operation and was rich in unused international route authorities.
Tired of airline bankruptcies....EA/PA/TW and finally DL.
SJCRRPAX From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 17, posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 4637 times:
Quoting Alaska737 (Reply 14): Didnt the second PSA crash pretty much shut down the airline?
dont most crashes in general make the airline/aircraft type safer?
Yes, I think so. Air travel is incredible safe, after each accident new things are learned. But they are also very hard financially on the Airline involved. After the AS261 crash not many people I know of in SJC wanted to take an Alaska flight to Mexico. I think the fact that a very popular financial talk show host, Cynthia Oti, was on board made that crash personal for a lot of people in the San Francisco Bay Area. Alaska is a great Airline now and I'm sure they learned a lot from the crash.
Ptugarin From United States of America, joined Sep 2006, 326 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 4610 times:
Gol is a big and healthy airline, and I doubt a crash can cause major disruptions and/or airline bancruptsy; this is what insurance is for. Even a much smaller airline, Armenian Air who lost two airframes this year (including one in a fatal crash) has not ceased its existence and I doubt it will.
Skyexramper From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 20, posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 4601 times:
For those who may not know, back in the very early days of Midwest Express, now Midwest Airlines, they lost a DC-9 just off the departure end of 1R, hitting houses, killing 60 and 3 people on the ground.
Alessandro From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 22, posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 4503 times:
Well, it depends what the black boxes find and the autopsy of the Gol pilots?
The worst case scenario for an airline is that their airplane have design errors
in them which caused the crash. I think of the MD-11 and Swissair.
Sideflare75 From United States of America, joined May 2005, 613 posts, RR: 1
Reply 23, posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 4327 times:
[quote=Skyexramper,reply=20]For those who may not know, back in the very early days of Midwest Express, now Midwest Airlines, they lost a DC-9 just off the departure end of 1R, hitting houses, killing 60 and 3 people on the ground.[/quote
It was 31 people and they were all on the aircraft. It crashed in the woods just off of runway 19R just across College Ave. due to engine failure on takeoff. But anyway it's hard to believe a small carrier like they were at the time could survive something like this only a little more than a year after starting operations. I wasn't working here yet but people still talk about it.
SeeTheWorld From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 1308 posts, RR: 4
Reply 24, posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 4301 times:
Quoting OB1504 (Reply 10): For the record, ValuJet voluntarily ceased operations. They did so after realizing that it would be harder for them to get things back to normal if they had to shut down as a result of an FAA mandate, especially because they had already prohibited ValuJet from increasing its fleet or network.
Crashes can be serious problems if there are other larger systemic problems with the airline. In the case of ValuJet, there were many systemic problems, and it was the worst kept secret in the aviation industry. Many of the aviation professionals I worked with at the time (prior to the Everglades crash) were extremely concerned about what they were hearing and seeing with regard to the ValuJet operation. In fact, two months before the crash, one of my colleagues said, "It's only a matter of time before something really bad happens there."
And, as stated above ValuJet WAS shutdown for several months by the FAA.
Quoting Cessna057 (Reply 11): Take the GOL for example. They may have prepared, but still they lost an aircraft which was bought for what $30m with 220 hours on the airframe. Also they have publicity because people always thing "oh well it happened once it will happen again", so they have to convince people its safe again.
If often depends on the type of crash. In the GOL case, it's pretty apparent that whatever went wrong will likely be attributed to the Legacy jet and not anything with GOL or its aircraft. When it becomes a tragic mistake (not due to the airline), it's usually not a long term problem. It's much murkier if it is unclear. A case in point was the US Air crash in PIT in 1994. US Air had had several crashes in previous years (one that was ATC's fault, two involving weather, and a runway overrun that cost the lives of two or three people), but it turned into a financial disaster for US Air because it took so long to figure out what happened. As the days, weeks, and months moved on, there was some real question as to whether they may be a systemic problem at US Air.
: DL191, NW255, and AA191 all happened with the media spotlight shining right on the company. Albeit DL191 was weather related, but still, those compan
: Any crash for an airline is bad enough, mostly for the families involved, but when it comes to bad publicity that affects the airline I believe ValuJe
: Almost all airlines around the world today have a whole dept. that is dedicated to disaster planning and recovery. It goes under various names, but i
: It sometimes mainly depends on whose fault the crash is. In the case of JAL 123 the President of JAL resigned while several employers and a number of