Kaitak744 From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 2208 posts, RR: 3 Reply 1, posted (6 years 7 months 3 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 3124 times:
Sydney (the kangaroo route) will be with the A380.
Possibilities for the 777-300ER? Some say MAN, some say ZRH. But truthfully, SQ has not announced anything yet. It is pretty vague, because the 773ER will seat as many (or less) than SQ's 772ER because of its more luxurious interior. So, I take it they will use the aircraft where they aren't competitive enough?
Possibilities in my opinion: SIN-TPE-LAX, SIN-DXB, SIN-MAN, SIN-JNB, SIN-AMS, SIN-ZRH, and maybe SIN-AMS-ORD and SIN-HKG-LAS.
QFSYD744 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 3, posted (6 years 7 months 3 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 2735 times:
Quoting Kaitak744 (Reply 1): Possibilities in my opinion: SIN-TPE-LAX, SIN-DXB, SIN-MAN, SIN-JNB, SIN-AMS, SIN-ZRH, and maybe SIN-AMS-ORD and SIN-HKG-LAS
OldAeroGuy From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 3206 posts, RR: 66 Reply 4, posted (6 years 7 months 3 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 2687 times:
Quoting Kaitak744 (Reply 1): Sydney (the kangaroo route) will be with the A380.
But the A380 will not arrive until a year after SQ receives its first 773ER. Sydney could be a possible destination in the interim.
Airplane design is easy, the difficulty is getting them to fly - Barnes Wallis
QF744 From Australia, joined Feb 2004, 413 posts, RR: 1 Reply 6, posted (6 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 2437 times:
SQ are going to despatch the 773ER on several Australian routes, but which ones yet is to be determined.
I was told that in a meeting with SQ execs last week.
QF744
Kaitak744 From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 2208 posts, RR: 3 Reply 7, posted (6 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 2333 times:
Quoting OldAeroGuy (Reply 4): But the A380 will not arrive until a year after SQ receives its first 773ER. Sydney could be a possible destination in the interim.
No, not Sydney for sure. It is something like this: A 747 leaves SIN and goes to LHR, then it goes to SYD, stopping at SIN. They it finally returns to SIN. So, if you want SYD with the 777-300ER, LHR will also have to be 777-300ER, and that won't happen.
SYD can get the 777-300ER is they add another frequency, but I don't know if there is that much demand for 4 flights a day.
OldAeroGuy From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 3206 posts, RR: 66 Reply 9, posted (6 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 2153 times:
Quoting Kaitak744 (Reply 7): No, not Sydney for sure. It is something like this: A 747 leaves SIN and goes to LHR, then it goes to SYD, stopping at SIN.
I wouldn't be too sure.
Let's see what happens in the first half of 2007.
Airplane design is easy, the difficulty is getting them to fly - Barnes Wallis
Bill142 From Australia, joined Aug 2004, 8320 posts, RR: 9 Reply 10, posted (6 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 2131 times:
Quoting OldAeroGuy (Reply 4): But the A380 will not arrive until a year after SQ receives its first 773ER. Sydney could be a possible destination in the interim.
SYD will keep the 744 as this was upgraded from a 773 some time ago? I would imagine PER, BNE or ADL will see the 77W
BoeingFever777 From United States of America, joined Jul 2009, 409 posts, RR: 56 Reply 11, posted (6 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 2102 times:
Intothinair From Germany, joined Mar 2005, 392 posts, RR: 2 Reply 13, posted (6 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 1986 times:
Quoting QF744 (Reply 6): SQ are going to despatch the 773ER on several Australian routes, but which ones yet is to be determined.
Quoting Bill142 (Reply 10): I would imagine PER, BNE or ADL will see the 77W
The only 2 routes that would make sense to me were MEL and SYD as the 773ERs are all equipped with F class and the only 2 australian destinations served with F class by SQ are SYD and MEL