Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Malaysia Resumes BEY, Axes CAI, ARN & EWR  
User currently offline9MMAR From Malaysia, joined Jul 2006, 2110 posts, RR: 18
Posted (7 years 12 months 4 days ago) and read 6715 times:

Malaysia Airlines made an important announcement today. MH confirms to resume flight to Beirut, and the made the much awaited official announcement about its termination of Cairo, Stockholm and New York Newark. Finally, all crystal clear.

On a side note, MH highlights its additional service to Paris from 5x pw to daily and to Los Angeles via Taipei, from 5x pw to 6x. Also additional frequencies to Hanoi and Cebu.

MAS strengthens international network
By Tamimi Omar

Malaysian Airline System Bhd (MAS) is further strengthening its international sector by resuming its thrice weekly Kuala Lumpur-Beirut flights effective Oct 15, increasing the use of code-sharing arrangements and charter operations, and developing links with the United States east coast via transatlantic carriers.

The Kuala Lumpur-Beirut route via Dubai is to meet the surge in travel demand for the destination arising from efforts for the return to normalcy in Lebanon. The flights will depart Kuala Lumpur on Tuesday, Friday and Sunday, with the return flights on the same day.

Based on the findings of its route profitability exercise, MAS will withdraw its operations between Kuala Lumpur and Cairo effective Nov 1 but will maintain an online general sales agent there.

In a statement on Oct 4, MAS managing director Idris Jala said under the same route profitability exercise, its Kuala Lumpur-Stockholm-New York route would be best operated using code-sharing arrangements via Amsterdam, one of MAS’ continental European hubs.

“We will increase the use of our existing code-sharing option with KLM to maintain operations between Kuala Lumpur and Stockholm via Amsterdam.

“In addition, we are negotiating with a few large Scandinavian travel agents and tour operators to explore the possibility of charter operations during the winter period to meet the traffic demand for Scandinavian passengers to Malaysia,” he said.

He added that MAS was also in active discussions with a few transatlantic carriers to develop links with cities in the US east coast via the Netherlands capital.

With these alternative arrangements, MAS will withdraw its Kuala Lumput-Stockholm-Newark operations effective Jan 15, 2007.

Its commercial director Datuk Abdul Rashid Khan said MAS would honour all forward bookings ticketed to date on the Kuala Lumpur-Cairo and Kuala Lumpur-Stockholm-Newark routes for travel beyond the service withdrawal dates.

“Where customers opt for refunds, all refund administrative charges will be waived and they will be reimbursed the full costs of their tickets,” he said.

Meanwhile, effective Oct 29, MAS said it would increase its frequency between Kuala Lumpur and Paris from five times weekly to daily flights, and the Kuala Lumpur-Taipei-Los Angeles route from five to six times.

At the regional level, it said effective Tuesday, two additional frequencies have been mounted for Kuala Lumpur-Hanoi, making it a total of nine weekly flights. It will also double its twice weekly KL-Cebu flights effective Oct 30.

43 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineJfk777 From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 8387 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (7 years 12 months 4 days ago) and read 6709 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Sadly no more Malaysia at Newark, they were a pleasure to watch for the 10 years they flew there.

User currently offlineTristarSteve From Sweden, joined Nov 2005, 4015 posts, RR: 34
Reply 2, posted (7 years 12 months 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 6560 times:

Quoting 9MMAR (Thread starter):
“In addition, we are negotiating with a few large Scandinavian travel agents and tour operators to explore the possibility of charter operations during the winter period to meet the traffic demand for Scandinavian passengers to Malaysia,”

Sounds strange. Is MH into long haul charter flights?


User currently offline9MMAR From Malaysia, joined Jul 2006, 2110 posts, RR: 18
Reply 3, posted (7 years 12 months 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 6485 times:

Yes. MH had done so to Bahrain and Kuwait for several years. Mostly to cater for tourists during the hot season in the Middle East.

Quoting 9MMAR (Thread starter):
its Kuala Lumpur-Stockholm-New York route would be best operated using code-sharing arrangements via Amsterdam, one of MAS’ continental European hubs.

A code share with KLM? Has it been inked?


User currently offlineXA744 From Mexico, joined Mar 2004, 734 posts, RR: 3
Reply 4, posted (7 years 12 months 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 6416 times:

It´s a shame to see MAS pulling out of New York. I can very well remember how the staff there were always struggling to fill up the plane in order to meet very demanding sales targets, when the flight was still operating via DXB.

I can think of two basic reasons for this service not having succeeded:

1.- Insufficient frequencies. A 5 x weekly scheme would have been more adequate, having in mind the very competitive conditions prevailing in the market nowadays.

2.- Flying to Newark. In spite of having arrangements with Continental, I honestly think JFK would have been a better option, from where MH could have entered a wider and more viable code share agreement with Delta.

I want to believe that the restructuring and rationalization measures being implemented by MAS´ head office, will, in the very short term, achieve the dramatic turnaround we are all hoping for.

Best regards



No matter how you fly...just never get your wings clipped !
User currently offlineTristarsteve From Sweden, joined Nov 2005, 4015 posts, RR: 34
Reply 5, posted (7 years 12 months 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 6371 times:

Quoting 9MMAR (Reply 3):
A code share with KLM? Has it been inked?

KLM flights AMS-ARN already carry MH code.


User currently offline9MMAR From Malaysia, joined Jul 2006, 2110 posts, RR: 18
Reply 6, posted (7 years 12 months 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 6286 times:

Quoting XA744 (Reply 4):
It´s a shame to see MAS pulling out of New York.

Yes Horacio, I can't believe the Malaysian flag carrier don't serve New York.  Sad

Quoting Tristarsteve (Reply 5):
Quoting 9MMAR (Reply 3):
A code share with KLM? Has it been inked?
KLM flights AMS-ARN already carry MH code.

I mean, a Transatlantic code share agreement with KLM, serving US cities (especially New York) via Amsterdam as the following suggest.

Quoting 9MMAR (Thread starter):
He added that MAS was also in active discussions with a few transatlantic carriers to develop links with cities in the US east coast via the Netherlands capital.


User currently offlineRaffik From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2006, 1716 posts, RR: 4
Reply 7, posted (7 years 12 months 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 6274 times:

Brilliant news that MH are returning to BEY! I have flown them many times and find their service brilliant! This means that just 1 airline has pulled out of BEY since the war- KLM


Happy -go- lucky kinda guy!
User currently offline9MMAR From Malaysia, joined Jul 2006, 2110 posts, RR: 18
Reply 8, posted (7 years 12 months 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 6246 times:

I always wonder Beirut is served because of good business performance or simply because of prestige. But I guess the load is quite good considering the BEY leg depart from DXB. There's more people who will fly to BEY from DXB vv rather than from KUL vv.

MH haven't include BEY in its online booking facilities via its website although the online flight schedule in the same website has included BEY.

Quoting Raffik (Reply 7):
This means that just 1 airline has pulled out of BEY since the war- KLM

I hope Lebanon's commercial aviation will soon fully recovered.


User currently offlineHumberside From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2005, 4922 posts, RR: 4
Reply 9, posted (7 years 12 months 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 6193 times:

Quoting XA744 (Reply 4):
2.- Flying to Newark. In spite of having arrangements with Continental, I honestly think JFK would have been a better option, from where MH could have entered a wider and more viable code share agreement with Delta.

How would any DL JFK codeshare agreement have been wider? CO offer far more flights and destinations than DL do at JFK



Visit the Air Humberside Website and Forum
User currently offlineBA From United States of America, joined May 2000, 11153 posts, RR: 59
Reply 10, posted (7 years 12 months 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 5913 times:

Quoting 9MMAR (Reply 8):
I always wonder Beirut is served because of good business performance or simply because of prestige. But I guess the load is quite good considering the BEY leg depart from DXB. There's more people who will fly to BEY from DXB vv rather than from KUL vv.

There is demand for flights from Asia (outside the Middle East) to Beirut and MH is the only airline that offers direct service, so that may explain why it's been successful.

A lot of people who fly on MH's flight to Beirut are connecting from Australia where there is a very large Lebanese population.



"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need." - Khalil Gibran
User currently offlineEurostarVA From Bahrain, joined May 2002, 1296 posts, RR: 7
Reply 11, posted (7 years 12 months 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 5875 times:

Quoting BA (Reply 10):
A lot of people who fly on MH's flight to Beirut are connecting from Australia where there is a very large Lebanese population.

What about the yield on those flights? Does anyone have any figures or performance information?



If there is a will, there is a way
User currently offlineAGRflyer From Switzerland, joined Nov 2005, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (7 years 12 months 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 5807 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

What about their flights to ZRH. I always thought that they are under review.


MXP-MUC-ORD/DFW-FRA-MXP in September LH in C, ZRH-TLV-ZRH in October LX in Y, ZRH-LCY-ZRH LX in Y in Nov
User currently offline717fan From Switzerland, joined Nov 2001, 2017 posts, RR: 6
Reply 13, posted (7 years 12 months 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 5776 times:

They have officially stated that ZRH will stay....there was a thread here about that...

User currently offline9MMAR From Malaysia, joined Jul 2006, 2110 posts, RR: 18
Reply 14, posted (7 years 12 months 3 days ago) and read 5598 times:

Quoting 717fan (Reply 13):
They have officially stated that ZRH will stay....there was a thread here about that...

I was about to tell that. It was my thread.

MH Quarterly Result Saw Zurich, Rome & LA To Stay (by 9MMAR Aug 31 2006 in Civil Aviation)


User currently offlineXA744 From Mexico, joined Mar 2004, 734 posts, RR: 3
Reply 15, posted (7 years 12 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 5513 times:

Quoting Humberside (Reply 9):
How would any DL JFK codeshare agreement have been wider? CO offer far more flights and destinations than DL do at JFK

Humberside, to my knowledge, most of the traffic to S.E. Asia on MH´s New York flight is not O & D; it basically originates in Southeastern U.S.A. Can´t disclose details, but I can only tell you that ATL, FLL and MIA are great contributors in terms of revenue and pax numbers to this flight.

Best regards



No matter how you fly...just never get your wings clipped !
User currently offlineSemsem From Israel, joined Jul 2005, 1779 posts, RR: 3
Reply 16, posted (7 years 12 months 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 5435 times:

Why is Singapore doing OK to New York and not Malaysia?

User currently offline9MMAR From Malaysia, joined Jul 2006, 2110 posts, RR: 18
Reply 17, posted (7 years 12 months 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 5387 times:

SQ is a very well managed airline. It is profitable and is the world's leading carrier in terms of market value. MH on the other hand has been mismanaged for years, with frequent interruptions from the Malaysian government over its business. Financially MH is in the red.

SQ is capable of serving New York (almost) everyday, and they serve both EWR and JFK non stop from SIN (to EWR). EWR for instance is serves by A345s, an aircraft with capable range of doing the route non-stop. MH only serves EWR 3x per week via ARN. MH doesn't have any A345s.

SQ is in an alliance, Star. MH is not in any alliance.

Among others...


User currently offlineWorldsurfer From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 128 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (7 years 12 months 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 5309 times:

The JFK flight operates JFK-FRA-SIN on SIA , and they also Codeshare with LH on the FRA-SIN routes which adds to their loads .

User currently offlinePanamair From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 4914 posts, RR: 25
Reply 19, posted (7 years 12 months 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 5295 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting 9MMAR (Reply 17):
Among others...

also,
- bigger market between FRA and JFK than between ARN and EWR.
- 3x weekly MH service via daily SQ service is not exactly conducive to business travel

Actually, didn't I read that SQ's EWR-SIN isn't exactly going gangbusters in the profitability department due to various reasons such as high fuel costs, relative low number of seats on the A345s, and relative inability to charge a premium for the nonstop flight (vs. the one-stop)?


User currently offlineBDRules From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2000, 1501 posts, RR: 3
Reply 20, posted (7 years 12 months 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 5108 times:

Since the MAN route got dropped ive been wondering what the problem was. The loads were good enough, if not better than the LHR load factors. Could the MAN route not of worked using a 777 or doesnt MH's 777's have the distance? i think the route could of worked and for me going home would of been loads easier

Regards

Stu


User currently offlinePieinthesky From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2005, 392 posts, RR: 1
Reply 21, posted (7 years 12 months 2 days ago) and read 4973 times:

The MAN flights were doing 'OK' according to the local MH staff. They were certainly doing better than some of the other routes. While some of these have also now been cut some worse performing flights have been kept, such as the cash bleeding EZE route. I think most of us can guess why that is...

MH's 777's would reach MAN and would have been ideal for the route. Why they continued to send a 744 in here I'll never know, as there is virtually no F market from here. That's why SQ send their 2 class 772ER in here 5 days out of 7.

MH are a fantastic airline to fly with, they really are. Unfortunately they suffer from terrible political interference (witness another genuis politician based in Brussels last week claiming MH should fly to BRU !!!???), and/or mismanagement as 9MMAR says. It's a terrible shame as the fabulous MH crews deserve much better than this..

I hope they can stick to their rebuilding programme get back on track and start flying to MAN again. I used to fly them 3 or 4 times a year from here, and don't fancy using that hellhole in West London.


User currently onlineB742 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 3768 posts, RR: 19
Reply 22, posted (7 years 12 months 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 4826 times:

Just a slight update on dates when these routes will be axed or increased:

Kuala Lumpur to Beirut 3x weekly services will be resumed on October 15th with flights via Dubai using the two class A330-200.

Kuala Lumpur to Cairo Service axed on the 1st of November

Kuala Lumpur to Cebu Flights increase from 2x to 4x weekly 734 from October 30th

Kuala Lumpur to Hanoi Flights have now increased from 7x to 9x weekly 734 from October 3rd

Kuala Lumpur to Newark via Stockholm Service discontinued from January 15th

Kuala Lumpur to Paris CDG Services upgraded from 5x weekly to Daily 772 from October 29th

Rob!  wave 


User currently offlineLJ From Netherlands, joined Nov 1999, 4435 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (7 years 12 months 21 hours ago) and read 4619 times:

Quoting BDRules (Reply 20):
Since the MAN route got dropped ive been wondering what the problem was. The loads were good enough, if not better than the LHR load factors.

Ever heard of low yield????? KUL-LHR is high yield while MAN-KUL was low yield 9and dropped even further when EK entered the market). Also yields on the KUL-ARN-EWR flight have been reported as low and EWR was only served to serve the pride of the airline. Therefore good to see they finally axe those destinations which don't make enough money. Now they only have to axe EZE (another destination which only pleases the pride of the airline) and I'm really beginning to thnk they will make it.

Quoting Pieinthesky (Reply 21):
The MAN flights were doing 'OK' according to the local MH staff. They were certainly doing better than some of the other routes.

I wonder how credible local staff can be.... I've never heard a local rep (of any airline) saying the route they managed wasn't doing "OK". If that would have been true every route in the world would be profitable....of which we know isn't true.


User currently offlineVirginia From Netherlands, joined Sep 2003, 82 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (7 years 12 months 19 hours ago) and read 4552 times:

9MMAR,

Why not start a 2nd flight with B777 to Amsterdam, instead of codesharing with KLM.

And about alliances, they should make their mind up if they are willing to join Skyteam.


Virginia


25 MAS777 : As discussed many many times before - I think its up to AF to decide if they want MAS in Skyteam. MAS has already expressed its interest to join ST a
26 LJ : Why would they? We've already 2 daily flights between KUL and AMS (one full pax 747 en one combi 747). I don't think three flights would be a good id
27 9MMAR : MH serves AMS daily on 744, and code shares with KL which makes it service to AMS twice daily. KL sends their 74E to KUL. I think the demand for a se
28 MH017 : you mean SU ? Do note, both MH and KL flights between AMS-KUL are always almost full on departure (>95%; don't know about yields, though), so an addi
29 9MMAR : Yes, SU, Aeroflot is what I mean. SK is SAS, sorry.
30 HB-IWC : The yields are unfortunately seriously under pressure since a year or so. Sure enough load factors are great but fares have dropped and the airlines
31 XA744 : This is most interesting. Now, if the Middle Eastern carriers are somehow " spoiling " the market, could this very same situation revert to them in a
32 Abrelosojos : So sad. I have really good memories on board MH and being on KUL-DXB-EWR. -A.
33 Cedars747 : Wonderful news for BEY ,by the way Lebanese citizens dont need visa to enter Malaysia Alex!!!
34 Virginia : 9MMAR, What surprises me that there is a market for F-class pax, was this not the reason for SQ to switch to B777 for SIN-AMS (not enough high yield p
35 TristarSteve : 9M-MAR Wondered if you had heard anything about ARN EWR. According to the MH station staff at ARN the decision to cancel the route has been overturned
36 Pieinthesky : You gotta be kidding ?. Is this is true, then here you have a perfect example of the biggest problem MH faces as it tries to get itself back on track
37 Post contains links OdiE : Don't think it deserves its own thread...yet, but EZE might get the ax after all. From Business Day (South Africa) [Edited 2006-10-20 03:47:45]
38 ZK-NBT : Interesting, where would a code share to KUL go via? HKG? Operated by SA JNB-HKG and changing to MH for HKG-KUL? I do however remember hearing that S
39 9MMAR : Surprise, surprise... I haven't heard of the news yet. So far, the decision to cancel ARN and EWR has been announced, but the news to reinstate ARN i
40 9MMAR : It has been announced. MH reinstated back ARN and EWR. Unbelievable. There's a thread about it.
41 TristarSteve : You get the news here on A net. Very good news for me personally as I work for them at ARN.
42 9MMAR : Since you mentioned that, maybe you could give us some lights over here on how long the reinstated service will be sustained? I mean, the reason for
43 TristarSteve : Haven't a clue! Sorry when I say I work for them, I do, but am not employed by MH. I do the maintenance here in ARN.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Cathay Pacific Cargo Adds ARN & YYZ To Network posted Mon Jun 19 2006 19:25:22 by Hkg82
757's To Europe-CO CLE To LGW & EWR To PRG? posted Mon May 2 2005 07:24:16 by SANSCOTT744
Turbulence & EWR posted Mon Apr 25 2005 00:16:44 by CB777
CO IAH & EWR Employee Help posted Sat Aug 14 2004 03:36:16 by Airportugal310
USA 3000 Nonstop From FLL-PHL, DTW, CLE, PIT & EWR posted Wed Oct 1 2003 17:59:24 by ScottysAir
Transfer Between JFK & EWR/LGA posted Wed Feb 12 2003 23:49:05 by VC-10
Direct Ground Trans. Btwn LGA & Ewr? posted Mon Aug 6 2001 20:06:42 by Qantas777
Spotting @ JFK, LGA & EWR posted Fri May 12 2000 20:58:49 by N503JB
Malaysia Airlines Service From EWR-ARN-KUL posted Mon Mar 6 2006 19:40:24 by Mptpa
Malaysia Airlines' B744s To EWR And ARN! posted Mon Jan 17 2005 06:10:50 by Odie