Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
UA948 Operated With Boeing 767-300ER!  
User currently offlineCV990 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (7 years 11 months 18 hours ago) and read 10144 times:

Hi!

I just found out that my flight from LAX to LHR ( UA948 ) is going to be operated with the 767-300ER....I was quite surprised because I would expect maybe a flight with the 777 and my flight from AMS to IAD ( UA947 ) is going to be with the 777. I'm glad I'll fly again in a 767 but can anyone explain me why is UA doing this.....just for my humble acknowledgement.
Regards

36 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineUnited_fan From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 7485 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (7 years 11 months 18 hours ago) and read 10118 times:

It has been a 763 since at least June 8th.

http://flightaware.com/live/flight/UAL948/history



'Empathy was yesterday...Today, you're wasting my Mother-F'ing time' - Heat.
User currently offlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 30901 posts, RR: 87
Reply 2, posted (7 years 11 months 18 hours ago) and read 10099 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

UA generally "sends in the 767s" when loads are light, like during the Low Season. The JFK-LHR flight is now a 763 until the termination of the service later this year.

The 777s you see during the summer are moved to routes with higher-traffic during the winter (replacing the 744s which served those routes during the High Season).


User currently offlineCHRISBA777ER From UK - England, joined Mar 2001, 5964 posts, RR: 62
Reply 3, posted (7 years 11 months 18 hours ago) and read 10099 times:

Can a 763ER do LHR-LAX non-stop at MTOW?


What do you mean you dont have any bourbon? Do you know how far it is to Houston? What kind of airline is this???
User currently offlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 30901 posts, RR: 87
Reply 4, posted (7 years 11 months 18 hours ago) and read 10099 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting CHRISBA777ER (Reply 3):
Can a 763ER do LHR-LAX non-stop at MTOW?

Not sure, but I imagine UA's birds aren't at MTOW.  Smile


User currently offlineUnited_Fan From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 7485 posts, RR: 7
Reply 5, posted (7 years 11 months 18 hours ago) and read 10053 times:

Well Aeroflot does LAX-Moscow,not sure if it's at MTOW.


'Empathy was yesterday...Today, you're wasting my Mother-F'ing time' - Heat.
User currently offlineVikingA346 From Sweden, joined Oct 2006, 515 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (7 years 11 months 17 hours ago) and read 9948 times:

Quoting CHRISBA777ER (Reply 3):
Can a 763ER do LHR-LAX non-stop at MTOW?

Yes, United runs LAX-LHR (United 948) on a 763ER.

It's roughly 8,800km between the city pairs - 763ER can do 11,300 km at best.

Does anyone know if anyone runs PEK-NYC? The 763ER can do it, but not sure if anyone runs it?

Viking A346

[Edited 2006-10-04 16:15:57]


...you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been and there you shall return
User currently offlineCHRISBA777ER From UK - England, joined Mar 2001, 5964 posts, RR: 62
Reply 7, posted (7 years 11 months 17 hours ago) and read 9922 times:

Quoting United_Fan (Reply 5):

Thats over the pole though.



What do you mean you dont have any bourbon? Do you know how far it is to Houston? What kind of airline is this???
User currently offlineCV990 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (7 years 11 months 17 hours ago) and read 9892 times:

Hi!

But we all must agree.....UA947 operates with 777 from AMS to IAD....UA948 operates with 763 from LAX to LHR....shouldn't a LAX/LHR route more "atractive" in the 777? Can I say that there's a need for more 744's or 777's to operate those UA routes???
Regards


User currently offlineAfay1 From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 1293 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (7 years 11 months 17 hours ago) and read 9852 times:

Ummmm not really, they use the plane that is right for what the route loads support. Why fly an empty 744 when a 763 will do?

User currently offlinePlanecrazy2 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 615 posts, RR: 4
Reply 10, posted (7 years 11 months 17 hours ago) and read 9838 times:

Quoting CV990 (Reply 8):



Quoting CV990 (Reply 8):
...shouldn't a LAX/LHR route more "atractive" in the 777?

They also run a 772 in addition to the 763, it is UA934.



United Airlines - Worldwide Service
User currently offlineCV990 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (7 years 11 months 17 hours ago) and read 9792 times:

Hi!

Hey, I don't want you to think that I'm against flying the UA 763!!!! Noop I'm quite pleased, I like very much the 763, I flew it a few years ago from JFK to LGW with BA and it was a wonderfull flight!!! I was just a bit surprised with that fact, beeing a 763ER, but I'm cool! I'll let you know in 3 weeks how it was!
And Planecrazy2 you are absolutely right, there's also a flight with a 777!
regards


User currently offlineN174UA From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 994 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (7 years 11 months 14 hours ago) and read 9446 times:

#934/935 used to be a 763 before it was upgraded some years ago. Looooong flight on a 763...I was ready to jump out over Utah..  Yeah sure

User currently offlineQFSYD744 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (7 years 11 months 13 hours ago) and read 9369 times:

United flew SFO-CDG for years with the 767-300, however there were some points at which the flight operated with the 777-200.

TWA, and American Airlines both flew LAX-CDG with the 767-300.

American Airlines flew SJC-CDG with the 767-300.

Air France flew SFO-CDG with the 767-300 prior to the A343/777/747-400.

Alitalia flew SFO-MXP with the 767-300.

VARIG flew the second daily LAX-GRU (2000-2001) with the 767-300. However the more constant aircraft on the route was MD-11, prior to that 747-300, 747-400.


User currently offlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26444 posts, RR: 75
Reply 14, posted (7 years 11 months 13 hours ago) and read 9350 times:

Quoting Planecrazy2 (Reply 10):
They also run a 772 in addition to the 763, it is UA934.

UA934 is the flight that was running when UA was only doing 1 flight per day on LAX-LHR.

Quoting CV990 (Thread starter):
I just found out that my flight from LAX to LHR ( UA948 ) is going to be operated with the 767-300ER....I was quite surprised because I would expect maybe a flight with the 777 and my flight from AMS to IAD ( UA947 ) is going to be with the 777. I'm glad I'll fly again in a 767 but can anyone explain me why is UA doing this.....just for my humble acknowledgement.

It is nothing new. Ever since United started flying a second LAX-LHR flight again, it has been a 763ER

Quoting Stitch (Reply 2):
UA generally "sends in the 767s" when loads are light, like during the Low Season.

Nothing low season about it. Read above

Quoting N174UA (Reply 12):
Looooong flight on a 763...I was ready to jump out over Utah..

What the hell for? The 767 is the most comfortable plane to fly on for a long haul, at least when you are in economy.



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineQFSYD744 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (7 years 11 months 13 hours ago) and read 9278 times:

Quoting N1120A (Reply 14):
It is nothing new. Ever since United started flying a second LAX-LHR flight again, it has been a 763ER

Do you remember the days in 2000? 2001? that UA operated a third daily seasonal flight from SFO-LHR with the 763? It departed at 725pm or so. The other flights which were 777 departed at 1245pm? and 500pm?


User currently offlineCXB744 From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 215 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (7 years 11 months 11 hours ago) and read 9094 times:

Quoting N1120A (Reply 14):
What the hell for? The 767 is the most comfortable plane to fly on for a long haul, at least when you are in economy.

The 767 takes 1 hours longer to make the trip both to & from LHR-LAX. I've flown both the B767-300ER & B777-200ER on the route. I have to agree with N174UA, when you know you could have taken another airline and been there faster, you're ready to kump out over Utah.

Quoting N174UA (Reply 12):
#934/935 used to be a 763 before it was upgraded some years ago. Looooong flight on a 763...I was ready to jump out over Utah

When was 934 a B767? I though it went from a B744 to B777 and the equipment has never been changed since.



What is it? It's A 747-400, but that's not important right now.
User currently offlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26444 posts, RR: 75
Reply 17, posted (7 years 11 months 10 hours ago) and read 9000 times:

Quoting CXB744 (Reply 16):
The 767 takes 1 hours longer to make the trip both to & from LHR-LAX. I've flown both the B767-300ER & B777-200ER on the route. I have to agree with N174UA, when you know you could have taken another airline and been there faster, you're ready to kump out over Utah.

Wrong. 20 minutes longer, and again, it is a more comfortable airplane.



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineRoseFlyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 9607 posts, RR: 52
Reply 18, posted (7 years 11 months 9 hours ago) and read 8875 times:

Quoting CV990 (Reply 8):
UA948 operates with 763 from LAX to LHR....shouldn't a LAX/LHR route more "atractive" in the 777?

It is. First class on the 777 is far more superior. In economy however, the 767 is better since it has fewer middle seats. The seats and PTVs are the same on both planes since UA did refit the 767s with new seating in business class and economy in the late 90s.

Quoting Afay1 (Reply 9):
Ummmm not really, they use the plane that is right for what the route loads support. Why fly an empty 744 when a 763 will do?

Well a 744 might be the best thing for LAX-LHR. It went to two flights a day with one on a 763ER and one on a 777.

Quoting N1120A (Reply 17):
Wrong. 20 minutes longer, and again, it is a more comfortable airplane.

It isn't in first class. United has two very different first class cabins going up against each other on the same route. The 777s are far more superior with the fully flat suites at 4 abreast whereas the 767s have 5 abreast older generation seats. For $10,000 it is obvious which one I would pick!

Quoting VikingA346 (Reply 6):
Quoting CHRISBA777ER (Reply 3):
Can a 763ER do LHR-LAX non-stop at MTOW?

Yes, United runs LAX-LHR (United 948) on a 763ER.

It's roughly 8,800km between the city pairs - 763ER can do 11,300 km at best.

While some 763ERs might be able to do the route, some probably can't. Not all of the 767-300ERs are the same since there are different MTOWs depending on engine choices and configuration of the plane. United probably doesn't have the highest weight 763ERs.



If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
User currently offlineDelta777Jet From Germany, joined Jun 2000, 1259 posts, RR: 3
Reply 19, posted (7 years 11 months 8 hours ago) and read 8758 times:

TWA never operated 763 between LAX and CDG! They were all operated by B-747-100/200 ! TWA did operated JFK-CAI/TLV flights!
LHR-LAX are not really long flights for a 763!
Condor uses 763 to fly nonstop FRA-LAS and even Delta operated L-1011-500 (which has a max range of 9900km) on FRA-LAX !!!



Fly easyJet
User currently offlinePlanecrazy2 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 615 posts, RR: 4
Reply 20, posted (7 years 11 months 8 hours ago) and read 8758 times:

Quoting N1120A (Reply 14):
UA934 is the flight that was running when UA was only doing 1 flight per day on LAX-LHR.

Correct, I am not sure what your point is though. Are you saying they don't run the flight anymore? United.com shows both flights today.



United Airlines - Worldwide Service
User currently offlineQFSYD744 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 21, posted (7 years 11 months 4 hours ago) and read 8503 times:

Quoting Delta777Jet (Reply 19):
TWA never operated 763 between LAX and CDG!

You may want to rethink your assurtion about that one!  wink 


User currently offlineN174UA From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 994 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (7 years 11 months 3 hours ago) and read 8458 times:

Quoting N1120A (Reply 14):
What the hell for? The 767 is the most comfortable plane to fly on for a long haul, at least when you are in economy.

Well, I discovered on that flight that I have a thing with claustrophobia after about 10 hours. And I was in connoisseur class, too. Nothing wrong with the service, it's just that I was at my limit. Ever since that flight, I've always broken up my West Coast-Europe flights with a stop back east, preferrably IAD. Last month I flew to/from FCO via PHL using US Airways. But, even that way, the last half of the flight can really drag, too. 6 of one, half dozen of the other.

Quoting CXB744 (Reply 16):
When was 934 a B767? I though it went from a B744 to B777 and the equipment has never been changed since.

I'm assuming #934 (LAX-LHR) was a 767 from LAX-LHR in April 1996...someone with the OAG guide can confirm. The reason I assume that is because I was on #935, LHR-LAX. I think that 767 that operated as #934 coming would turn for #935 going back to LAX? Perhaps not.

I'm almost certain though that LAX-LHR was never served by a 744 by UA, though. 767 and 777. Perhaps as a substitute, but never on a regular basis. Correct me if I'm wrong, by all means.

[Edited 2006-10-05 05:56:15]

User currently offlineLaxintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 25148 posts, RR: 46
Reply 23, posted (7 years 11 months 3 hours ago) and read 8451 times:

Quoting Delta777Jet (Reply 19):
TWA never operated 763 between LAX and CDG!

TW indeed operated a 763 between LAX-CDG. Matter of fact for several years!

Quoting CXB744 (Reply 16):
When was 934 a B767? I though it went from a B744 to B777 and the equipment has never been changed since.

934 was a 763 for many years during the mid 90s. This was the same time AA operated LAX-LHR and LAX-ORY/CDG with 763s also.

UA did not operate the 744 LAX-LHR, however did the 747SP briefly when the route began circa 1991 or so. 744s on the other hand have been used regularly on/off the SFO-LHR instead.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineCV990 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 24, posted (7 years 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 7926 times:

Hi!

Sorry to come back to this matter, I'm still a bit "bugged"...I found out that SFO for example have also 2 flights to LHR, UA930 operated with 744 and UA954 operated with 777....well I do think that San Francisco is an awesome place to visit, great sights, etc. etc., but Los Angeles have also great places to visit so I would think that maybe if United offered both flights with 777 would give a value-added to their business, what do you think about these two different "strategies" - SFO = 744 + 777 and LAX = 763 + 777???
Regards


25 Laxintl : I dont see what the big deal is. Keep in mind the 763 rotation is simply an extra seasonal flight which ends late Oct. The UA934/935 with a 777 is th
26 MCOflyer : This probably was the cheaper flight.
27 EHHO : CO flies EWR-PEK, with 772ERs though. I don't know what engines CO uses on them, but even with the most restricted ones (the PW ones, I believe) MTOW
28 Post contains images ZRHnerd : Matter of opinion.
29 MCOflyer : GE engines on their 777's. See the latest issue of airways. Happy Flying, MCOflyer
30 CV990 : Hi LaxIntl! Did you at any time see me complaining about flying the 767??? Did you checked out what I said about flying UA 767? My first post and my r
31 Stitch : CV990, SFO is a larger UA hub then LAX is, so UA gets more traffic via SFO then LAX, and therefore justifies larger planes.
32 CV990 : Hi! Stitch, well that's the answer I wanted...thanks a lot pal! Now I fully understand and it clears something that ALWAYS bugged me...I felt that UA
33 Boston92 : Doesn't UA have a AMS-IAD on a 763. UA 903 I believe. The second part of this flight number I think is UA 903 IAD-DEN with a 777. If I was traveling f
34 Stitch : You would receive two BPs: one for the AMS-IAD segment and one for the IAD-DEN.
35 Jfk777 : Piror to the 777 they flew 763 from LAX to LHR for years. 747 were used from SFO to LHR, LAX was always a 763 before the 777.
36 Stirling : You might be thinking of the A34X, which is the slowest of all widebody aircraft.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Boeing 767-300ER Lease Rate & Availability posted Thu Sep 1 2005 17:58:05 by BrightCedars
Delta Boeing 767-300ER posted Sat Nov 1 2003 12:18:22 by Aircraft88
Comair Orders 30 Boeing 767-300ER Aircraft. posted Sun Apr 1 2001 19:47:05 by BA
Boeing 767-300ER posted Sun Oct 31 1999 20:55:49 by DELTA FLYER
Delta 767-300ER With Economy Headrests? posted Mon Jul 17 2006 04:52:52 by 1337Delta764
Santa Barbara Airlines New Flights With 767-300ER posted Thu Oct 20 2005 05:34:59 by BA747
Boeing 767-What Airlines Operate With RR Engines? posted Tue May 25 2004 20:38:02 by Btblue
Boeing 767-400ER With Different Winglet posted Fri Apr 25 2003 04:23:33 by United777
Questions With The Boeing 767 posted Wed Nov 7 2001 12:29:38 by Hoons90
KLM Orders Boeing 777-300ER And More posted Tue Nov 14 2006 21:47:08 by Kevin