Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
For All Pilots On The Forum  
User currently offlineERAU From Canada, joined May 1999, 39 posts, RR: 0
Posted (16 years 11 months 1 week 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 2359 times:

Hi, with all the concern with increased safety because of the AA crash recently, what are some ways, maybe out of the ordinary, to make pilots jobs more safe and at the same time not increase airlines costs too much.
I mean be reasonable but, if it were up to you to start fresh with a totally new way of scheduling airline pilots, how would you do it keeping in mind the maximum hours allowed each day/month/year based on FAA regulations.

2 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineAmerican 767 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4639 posts, RR: 12
Reply 1, posted (16 years 11 months 1 week 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 2358 times:

The FAA regulations for pilot scheduling are as follows:
No more than 8 flying hours within a 24 hour period, no more than 30 within a week, 100 within a month and 1000 within a year. I would make sure there is a relief crew in case the pilots exceed their duty time, I mean a crew at any of the hubs. In the case of flight 1420, it was in Dallas it should have been the end of the duty for the crew. They had been on duty for more than 8 hours already! Within one day! A relief crew could have flown the aircraft to Little Rock. I just don't understand how the airline let the crew be on duty for such a long time within the day, with 2 or 3 stops.
If I were working in the crew scheduling department of an airline, I would make sure that no crew exceeds duty time, like I mentioned.

Ben Soriano

Ben Soriano
User currently offlinePurdue Cadet From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (16 years 11 months 1 week 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 2358 times:

I'm sorry to deviate from the original question, but this is a response to the last post. We really must differentiate between "flying time," which is limited to 8 hours per day, and "duty time," which is limited by law to 16 hours a day and by AA's pilot contract to 14 hours per day. While the pilots were on duty for roughly 13.5 hours prior to the accident of 1420, they were below contractual limits, and well below legal duty time limits. The reason that the airline could allow the crew to be on duty for so long is that there was no reason not to. Were the crew members too fatigued to continue, they would be the only ones who could know that.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Looking For All Info On [the Sinking] Kansai (KIX) posted Sat Feb 24 2001 02:43:23 by 747-600X
Will Fliers Pay For Extra Space On The 787? posted Fri May 26 2006 19:41:01 by BoomBoom
Question For All Pilots... posted Thu May 26 2005 20:29:40 by Brnhornt
Any Pilots On This Forum? posted Wed Feb 5 2003 18:14:26 by Alitalia744
A Personal Plane For All To Replace The Auto? posted Fri Jun 21 2002 07:48:37 by Zanadou
All Quiet On The CI 742 Crash? posted Mon Jun 3 2002 11:50:01 by Na
50 Years For Air NZ On The Coral Route posted Fri Dec 7 2001 03:05:34 by JaseWGTN
Who On The Forum Is A Pilot And What Do You Fly? posted Fri Jul 7 2000 01:10:37 by MD-90
A Simple Question For All Pilots posted Tue Apr 25 2000 13:44:52 by Kottan
FA's on the Forum..... posted Thu Mar 18 1999 05:47:18 by G5