Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
A340-500/600 Power  
User currently offlineTim From Australia, joined Jun 2000, 705 posts, RR: 3
Posted (13 years 11 months 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 1536 times:

Howdy all,

Are the new A340-500/600 series engines going to be a lot more powerfull than the powerplants on the 200/300 series?

The 500/600 will be a great aircraft im sure, but if it can have a faster cruise speed than the 200/300 series that would be a bonus.
It seems to me, going by other peoples opinions on this forum that the A340-200/300 series is a very well liked aircraft, except for its engine power. If the 500/600 series comes with a more beefier powerplant, it should be very well recieved in the market.

I am yet to fly a A340-200/300 but I flew a CX A333 last year in Perth, which was an awesome aircraft.

Also, is it true that the new A340-500/600 will be the longest COMMERCIAL passenger aircraft in the world? Taking over the 773 in length?

Thanks
Tim
Perth, Australia

10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineFlyf15 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (13 years 11 months 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 1470 times:

Yes, they will have almost double the power of the -200/300. The -600 will be about 2ft longer than the 777-300 if I remember correctly.

User currently offlineCPDC10-30 From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2000, 4785 posts, RR: 23
Reply 2, posted (13 years 11 months 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 1464 times:

The -500 will be powered by the RR Trent 500 engines with 53,000 lbs thrust each. MTOW = 804,700 lbs.

The -600 is powered by RR Trent 500 engines with 56,000 lbs thrust each. MTOW = 804,700.

It may be surprising to some, but the MTOW is the same because the -600 is much longer but carries signifigantly less fuel than the -500. In this the case, the -600 will have better performance than the -500.

Thrust/weight ratio for -500: 0.263452218
Thrust/weight ratio for -600: 0.278364608

For comparison:
Thrust/weight ratio for A340-300: 0.224311397
Thrust/weight ratio for A330-300: 0.280319252
Thrust/weight ratio for 777-300ER: 0.305769742
Thrust/weight ratio for 747-400: 0.289371429

In both cases, I assumed max thrust engine available and highest MTOW model. Information is from Airbus and Boeing website.

So, yes it will have much better power than the A340-300 but still is lacking compared to Boeing products.


User currently offlineTim From Australia, joined Jun 2000, 705 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (13 years 11 months 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 1456 times:

Thanks for the info!
exactly what I was after

One more thing. Will they (500 & 600) cruise faster than the 200/300

Tim


User currently offlineGerardo From Spain, joined May 2000, 3481 posts, RR: 31
Reply 4, posted (13 years 11 months 4 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 1435 times:

YEP, the -500 and -600 will be cruise at about M0.815 to M0.82, compared to M0.8 for the -200/-300, or the M0.78 for the B767.

Regards
Gerardo



dominguez(dash)online(dot)ch ... Pushing the limits of my equipment
User currently offlineRIX From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 1787 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (13 years 11 months 4 weeks ago) and read 1409 times:

Even if A340-500/600 still have less thrust/weight ratio than Boeing I think they are absolutely all right now. But: aren't they too thirsty?

User currently offlineTEDSKI From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (13 years 11 months 4 weeks ago) and read 1409 times:

Airbus should add the higher thrust P&W 4000 series and GE CF6 as options for the A340-500/600.

User currently offlineBoeing747-700 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (13 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1377 times:

I think the TRENT sould be fine. Rolls Royce is top notch for the job and I could not be happier with the RR symbol on the engine cowls. I love Rolls Royce and I think they sould be on all of Air Canadas Airplanes ie the 747's and IAE on the A319/320/321s too. It will be nice to see some more of AC's 340/330 with RR's.
If anything Boeing needs to place the TRENT 800 on the NG 777's with Higher Thursts.


User currently offlineTEDSKI From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (13 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 1366 times:

If Boeing added the Trent 800 on the 777NG models you will see a lot more airlines like American, Delta, BA, CP & maybe Air Canada ordering them.

User currently offlineBoeing747-700 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (13 years 11 months 3 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 1339 times:

Oh yeah. It is just stupid that they did not think of that when they made the GE 90 the Only choice of power on the 777 NGs. Maybe they will come to their senses and put the Trent where it sould be as well as a PW choice.

User currently offlineTEDSKI From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (13 years 11 months 3 weeks 5 days ago) and read 1318 times:

This is a situation where GE paid off Boeing to have their powerplants exclusively on their aircraft. A good example is the CFM56 powered 737NGs, they should have had IAE market their V2500 as an option like on the A320 family.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why Is The A340-500/600 So Eagerly Discounted? posted Fri Nov 23 2007 07:02:00 by EBJ1248650
What If A340-500/600 Is Revamped With Help OfA380? posted Wed Sep 19 2007 23:31:37 by Victor009
A340-300 Vs A340-500/600 During Turbulences posted Fri Aug 4 2006 10:29:11 by LY777
New Enhanced A340-500/600 posted Mon Nov 28 2005 21:08:41 by AeroPiggot
A340-500/600 , A380 For JET Airways? posted Wed Jun 15 2005 20:23:36 by FCKC
A340-500/600 Update posted Fri Aug 27 2004 00:15:02 by DfwRevolution
Questions On The A340-500/600 posted Thu Jun 3 2004 03:03:24 by CO737800
Air Canada A340-500/600 Update posted Mon Mar 22 2004 23:42:50 by Cessnapimp
Airbus A340-500/600 Orders/Deliveries/Operators posted Sat Mar 6 2004 03:49:56 by Teahan
NWA Boeing 777-300ER Or Airbus A340-500/600? posted Fri Feb 27 2004 15:29:03 by KEESJE