Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Korean Air Article In Avweek - Upcoming KAL Order  
User currently offlineUAL747-600 From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 577 posts, RR: 0
Posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 8179 times:

The article states that within 2 years they'll have 26 747-400F (didn't break down existing new build F's and BCFs). Additionally, they are looking at 777-200F's and 747-8F's. Also states that they'll be placing a pax order by year end. Here's the statement.

fair use except:

According to Lee, before year-end, Korean Air will decide on a major aircraft order to add to its passenger fleet. The airline is looking at the Boeing 787 (of which it has already ordered 10), the 747-8 and the 777-300ER, in addition to the 747-8F and the 777F. Lee says Korean Air is not interested in the Airbus A350.

UAL747-600

27 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineMauriceB From Netherlands, joined Aug 2004, 2489 posts, RR: 25
Reply 1, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 8145 times:

Quote:
Lee says Korean Air is not interested in the Airbus A350.

This is actually the first time i hear this since airlines make the choice between 787/A350...


User currently offlineOldAeroGuy From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 3476 posts, RR: 67
Reply 2, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 8133 times:

Quoting MauriceB (Reply 1):
Quote:
Lee says Korean Air is not interested in the Airbus A350.


This is actually the first time i hear this since airlines make the choice between 787/A350...

Perhaps it's because they have already selected the 787.



Airplane design is easy, the difficulty is getting them to fly - Barnes Wallis
User currently offlineMauriceB From Netherlands, joined Aug 2004, 2489 posts, RR: 25
Reply 3, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 8037 times:

Quoting OldAeroGuy (Reply 2):
Perhaps it's because they have already selected the 787.

I think it has more reasons, but i think i won't have to explain what i mean  Wink


i mean, SQ orderd the A350 after they already orderd the 787...


User currently offlineDeltaDC9 From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 2844 posts, RR: 4
Reply 4, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 7928 times:

Quoting OldAeroGuy (Reply 2):
Perhaps it's because they have already selected the 787.



Quoting MauriceB (Reply 3):
mean, SQ orderd the A350 after they already orderd the 787...

The 350 competes with the 787 AND the 777, so it is a question of which models, as they actually dovetail quite well and do not really match pound for pound seat for seat anyways.



Dont take life too seriously because you will never get out of it alive - Bugs Bunny
User currently offlineJohnny From Sweden, joined Jan 2008, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 7880 times:

For Korean it makes no sense to go the A350-way because Korean Aerospace produces parts for the B787.

The other reason for their Boeing-Preference this time could also be the political situation right now.As we all know South Korea is seeking for military assistance from the US, so a Boeing order is political correct right now.

I think that is more than understandable.

 Smile


User currently offlineNYC777 From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 5731 posts, RR: 48
Reply 6, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 7812 times:

Quoting Johnny (Reply 5):
For Korean it makes no sense to go the A350-way because Korean Aerospace produces parts for the B787.

The other reason for their Boeing-Preference this time could also be the political situation right now.As we all know South Korea is seeking for military assistance from the US, so a Boeing order is political correct right now.

I think that is more than understandable.

They only make the tailcone for the 787, hardly a major piece like the main fuselage.

SK also gets military assistance from a lot of other countries aside from the US and KAL is an independent company. If they are to make an order politics and other economic considerations are really not going to be factor. The only factor is which aircraft is best of its needs. BTW year end is in ten weeks. Not too long before KAL and few other majors decide on what they want to order.

[Edited 2006-10-16 16:46:03]


That which does not kill me makes me stronger.
User currently offlineBringiton From United States of America, joined Sep 2006, 866 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 7772 times:

Why dont we also consider the fact that they might find the 787 more atractive to their buisness plan and airline requirments ?? Another reason could be that they do have cozy relationship with boeing and the 787 could offer ofset discount on the F-15K deal or the 737AEW which has been selected !! There are numerous reasons which could explain their explaination but we have to seriously consider the fact they they dont know what and when the XWB is going to come out and they have allready ordered the 787 so it should be a much safer descision specially if they are looking at the -8 varient !

[Edited 2006-10-16 16:59:40]

User currently offlineScaledesigns From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 211 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 7739 times:

For them to say they are "NOT" looking at the A350 is a slap for something they did or didnt do.We all know what it is.


F1 Tommy
User currently offlineManni From South Korea, joined Nov 2001, 4221 posts, RR: 23
Reply 9, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 7679 times:

Quoting Bringiton (Reply 7):
Another reason could be that they do have cozy relationship with boeing and the 787 could offer ofset discount on the F-15K deal or the 737AEW which has been selected !!

KE is a private company. They could care less what the army pays for their toys.

Quoting Scaledesigns (Reply 8):
For them to say they are "NOT" looking at the A350 is a slap for something they did or didnt do.

I dont understand this kind of announcements. OZ did exactely the same when talking about the 748i and the A350 (before its current proposal). You could atleast pretend, in order not to pay a premium for the aircraft you want.

Quoting UAL747-600 (Thread starter):
According to Lee, before year-end, Korean Air will decide on a major aircraft order to add to its passenger fleet. The airline is looking at the Boeing 787 (of which it has already ordered 10), the 747-8 and the 777-300ER, in addition to the 747-8F and the 777F. Lee says Korean Air is not interested in the Airbus A350.

Since you haven't mentioned the source, we'll have to take it at face value. However KE has said that it might convert her options for the A380 into firm orders, including the A380F, before the end of the year IIRC.

posted in Air and Cosmos (a topic on this can be found in the archives).



SUPPORT THE LEBANESE CIVILIANS
User currently offlineUAL747-600 From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 577 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 7656 times:

Quoting Manni (Reply 9):
Since you haven't mentioned the source, we'll have to take it at face value. However KE has said that it might convert her options for the A380 into firm orders, including the A380F, before the end of the year IIRC.

The source is this week's Aviation Weekly and Space Technology as mentioned in the subject header.


User currently offlineN328KF From United States of America, joined May 2004, 6483 posts, RR: 3
Reply 11, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 7593 times:

Quoting Johnny (Reply 5):
For Korean it makes no sense to go the A350-way because Korean Aerospace produces parts for the B787.

It must be interesting living in a world where every order is conducted primarily for political reasons.



When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.' T.Roosevelt
User currently offlineBoeingFever777 From United States of America, joined Jul 2009, 409 posts, RR: 54
Reply 12, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 7580 times:

I believe that KE's upcoming order will be an all Boeing order both for freighter/passanger expansion.

Wonder if they are looking at the 748i and 772LR?



Faire du ciel le plus bel endroit de la terre.
User currently offlineManni From South Korea, joined Nov 2001, 4221 posts, RR: 23
Reply 13, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 7552 times:

Quoting UAL747-600 (Reply 10):
The source is this week's Aviation Weekly and Space Technology as mentioned in the subject header.

I couldn't make that out of 'Avweek', but thanks for clarifying.



SUPPORT THE LEBANESE CIVILIANS
User currently offlineVivekman2006 From India, joined May 2006, 530 posts, RR: 3
Reply 14, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 6 days ago) and read 7402 times:

With the current fiasco over the production delays of the A380, it remains to be seen when the A350 would see the light of day!  Confused

It makes sense for KE to stick to Boeing as the 777-300ER is already flying and the 787 prototype is under construction  checkmark 


User currently offlineScouseflyer From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2006, 3374 posts, RR: 9
Reply 15, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 6 days ago) and read 7381 times:

Quoting Vivekman2006 (Reply 14):
With the current fiasco over the production delays of the A380, it remains to be seen when the A350 would see the light of day!

It makes sense for KE to stick to Boeing as the 777-300ER is already flying and the 787 prototype is under construction

Agree it's likely that they need planes before 2012 so they'll have to go for either/or/and 787 777 - unless they want some cheap A330s?


User currently offlineJohnny From Sweden, joined Jan 2008, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 7154 times:

@N328KF

"Quoting Johnny (Reply 5):
For Korean it makes no sense to go the A350-way because Korean Aerospace produces parts for the B787.

It must be interesting living in a world where every order is conducted primarily for political reasons"

I guess you quoted the wrong part of my post...Funny!


User currently offlineAerokiwi From New Zealand, joined Jul 2000, 2683 posts, RR: 4
Reply 17, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 7108 times:

First up, SQ has signed a LOI for the A350XWB only, largely because no one knows quite what this plane will be yet and when it will be it. And for the very same reason, plus the fact that the A350 is projected to not fully compete with the 787, KE has ruled the plane out. Can you blame them? Business HATES uncertainty and that's exactly what Airbus keeps dishing up in spades.

I would expect a 773ER and 748F order combination.


User currently offlineBoeingfever777 From United States of America, joined Jul 2009, 409 posts, RR: 54
Reply 18, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 7082 times:

If KE is for real on getting the 773ER where in there network would they fly this a/c or would this order be meant for expansion?


Faire du ciel le plus bel endroit de la terre.
User currently offlineJohnny From Sweden, joined Jan 2008, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 7071 times:

I think KE has already commited to the B787 and are very happy with their B777s.

So it is absolutely ok that they rule out the A350.


 Smile


User currently offline2wingtips From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 20, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 6940 times:

Quoting Manni (Reply 9):
Since you haven't mentioned the source, we'll have to take it at face value. However KE has said that it might convert her options for the A380 into firm orders, including the A380F, before the end of the year IIRC.

This is also from the same article and suggests KE won't order 380Fs:

By contrast, Choi all but rules out an order for the Airbus A380
freighter, saying that containers and infrastructure provisions are
not compatible with the aircraft. With Korean Air's high share of
transit freight, the airline is particularly keen to standardize
containers and procedures.


User currently offlineLightsaber From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12877 posts, RR: 100
Reply 21, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 6321 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting 2wingtips (Reply 20):
By contrast, Choi all but rules out an order for the Airbus A380
freighter, saying that containers and infrastructure provisions are
not compatible with the aircraft. With Korean Air's high share of
transit freight, the airline is particularly keen to standardize
containers and procedures.

Interesting reasoning...

With all due respect, I hope Korean Air kept such details "hidden" until the purchase price was agreed upon!  Wink

I'm amazed by how fast freight is growing. (Note I didn't say suprised.) ICN looks to be growing into a nice pax and frieght hub!  bigthumbsup 

Lightsaber



Societies that achieve a critical mass of ideas achieve self sustaining growth; others stagnate.
User currently offlineCarpethead From Japan, joined Aug 2004, 2940 posts, RR: 3
Reply 22, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 5821 times:

Not to be overlooked is an additional order for 737NGs. Perhaps wingleting their existing fleet of 738s.

When are they going to replace the remaining fleet of A300s? Though not very old yet, fleet numbers are small, relative speaking to other aircraft families KE operates. While not a direct seat-per-seat basis replacement, the 739ER would be a good replacement plane. Increase frequencies and where KE can't like on NRT-PUS/CJU, the larger A333 could be used.


User currently offlineManni From South Korea, joined Nov 2001, 4221 posts, RR: 23
Reply 23, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 5215 times:

Quoting 2wingtips (Reply 20):
This is also from the same article and suggests KE won't order 380Fs:

Correct, however when the article was published I reffered to the A380F was still an option. The delays of the A380 has cost Airbus a potential A380F customer it seems.

From the article,

"Choi explained that the carrier is "still weighing" which aircraft to order but has narrowed its choices down to the 777F and 747-8F. It "was interested in the A380 freighter, but it's too late now [given the delays to A380 production]," he said. "There is not much option left in [the long-haul freighter] market," and the airline "probably" will order both Boeing types."

The wording is a bit strange. Why 'probably'? Is Airbus having a shot at it with the soon to be launched A332F or perhaps a A345F?

As for the passenger aircraft,

from the article,

"Korean Air President and COO Jong Hee Lee said the 777-300ER and 747-8 passenger version also are under consideration. VP-Strategy Development Keehong Woo added that an order for new passenger aircraft is forthcoming. "We need more aircraft in the future and we are talking with Boeing and Airbus," he said. When asked to characterize the size of the order to be placed, he said, "It's not small."

No word on the A350 being rejected...

http://www.atwonline.com/news/story.html?storyID=6775



SUPPORT THE LEBANESE CIVILIANS
User currently offline2wingtips From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 24, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 5203 times:

Quoting Manni (Reply 23):
No word on the A350 being rejected...

except they may want their planes before 2014/15
 Wink


25 Flykal : More 737NG's will be on the way and yes, some will be fitted with winglets.
26 Centrair : Just a little note about the 787 and Korea. They have a direct contract to build the tail cone. However, there are some subcontracts from Mitsubishi,
27 Post contains images American777 : SQ signed a letter of intent to purchase 20 A350XWB's! So now I think that SQ will not firm the order since they firm up their order for 20 Boeing 78
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Korean Air Back In Christchurch posted Thu Jan 5 2006 09:35:31 by Airnz777pilot
Korean Air - What Have They Got On Order? posted Mon Jan 12 2004 15:40:48 by CHRISBA777ER
3 Korean Air Widebodies In MSP posted Wed Sep 12 2001 01:04:47 by Aking8488
Korean Air New Destinations In South And SE Asia posted Fri Sep 29 2006 21:02:12 by 777way
Air Fares In Europe To "Double" - Article posted Wed Jul 5 2006 20:18:38 by N62NA
Korean Air Near A380F Order. posted Wed Jun 28 2006 14:33:05 by FCKC
Korean Air Biggest Freighting Airline In The World posted Thu Jan 5 2006 09:40:15 by Airnz777pilot
Korean Air 747 Cargo Crash At Stansted in 1999 posted Wed Nov 9 2005 22:18:08 by Drinkstrolley
Korean Air Ranks 1st In 2004 Cargo Transportation posted Fri Jul 1 2005 03:13:36 by HeeseokKoo
Korean Air In Istanbul? posted Tue May 17 2005 13:50:36 by Emrecan