Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Gulf Air Suspends New Paris Flight  
User currently offlineBehramjee From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 4772 posts, RR: 43
Posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 5535 times:

Hi,

I would like to inform you that Gulf Air has suspended with immediate effect their new 4 weekly A 332 nonstop flights between Muscat and Paris.

These flights started in July 2006 and were making massive losses.

No new additional flights to LHR/CDG/FRA are being planned as a subsitute for the time being.

Most likely the A 332 used for MCT-CDG will be utilized to operate extra flights during the Dec-Jan HAJJ SEASON.

22 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineMEACEDAR From Lebanon, joined Oct 2006, 753 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 5459 times:

Thanks for telling us.  Smile

User currently offlineJacobin777 From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 14968 posts, RR: 60
Reply 2, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 5205 times:

This sure doesn't sound good for GF..maybe this is the reason why Hogan decided to bolt over to EY..he probably saw something like this coming..

I hope GF steps up to the challenges they have on multiple levels...



"Up the Irons!"
User currently offlineSoups From Ghana, joined Jun 2004, 3438 posts, RR: 14
Reply 3, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 5205 times:

When i was in Bahrain they operated BAH-MCT-CDG thats a bit of backtracking!


Next destinations, Suarabaya, beirut, paris, Accra
User currently offlineLijnden From Philippines, joined Apr 2003, 564 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 4946 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Any change of GF coming back to AMS?
They used to fly to AMS all the time with L1011



Be kind to animals!
User currently offlineSWISSER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 4818 times:

Quoting Lijnden (Reply 4):
Any change of GF coming back to AMS?

There are rumours, but as usual with this company, it's just rumours.


User currently offlineBehramjee From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 4772 posts, RR: 43
Reply 6, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days ago) and read 4703 times:

GF has no plans for AMS what so ever.

the biggest problem for GF is that they have failed to expand internationally like QR-EK and EY have over the last few years hence their market share has dropped to many destinations especially to their core markets i.e. India and Karachi.

GF also flies an A 320 daily BAH-MCT-BOM which I dont know why as such a flight will never make money due to the operational costs of the route...they still fly BAH-MCT-CCU twice a week A 320...CCU has been officially acknowledged as a loss making route and yet still flown!

Even to MAA, some flights are with a B 763 BAH-MCT-MAA!!!

And now GF 18 which was a nonstop BAH-CDG A 332 daily operation has become MCT-BAH-CDG!!!


User currently offlineToulouse From Switzerland, joined Apr 2005, 2758 posts, RR: 58
Reply 7, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days ago) and read 4695 times:

Behramjee,

As you seem to have some sound inside info on GF, any idea how they're doing on their Bahrain-Dublin route. Many people seem to be wondering about this on the Irish threads. Would appreciate any info if you have any.

Thanks.



Long live Aer Lingus!
User currently offlineGFA330 From Turkey, joined Oct 2006, 105 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days ago) and read 4662 times:

Quoting Toulouse (Reply 7):
As you seem to have some sound inside info on GF, any idea how they're doing on their Bahrain-Dublin route. Many people seem to be wondering about this on the Irish threads. Would appreciate any info if you have any.

Currently the only route beating it's target, it has been a real money machine.

Quoting Lijnden (Reply 4):
Any change of GF coming back to AMS?
They used to fly to AMS all the time with L1011

If KL would allow it yes

Quoting Jacobin777 (Reply 2):
This sure doesn't sound good for GF..maybe this is the reason why Hogan decided to bolt over to EY..he probably saw something like this coming..

CDG MCT was his stupid idea. No loss for GF that he ran over to EY.
It was known before it was started that it had very little connex.

Quoting Behramjee (Thread starter):
Most likely the A 332 used for MCT-CDG will be utilized to operate extra flights during the Dec-Jan HAJJ SEASON.

BAH PVG maybe


User currently offlineToulouse From Switzerland, joined Apr 2005, 2758 posts, RR: 58
Reply 9, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days ago) and read 4642 times:

Quoting GFA330 (Reply 8):
Currently the only route beating it's target, it has been a real money machine.

Very interesting! Thanks for the info.



Long live Aer Lingus!
User currently offlineJacobin777 From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 14968 posts, RR: 60
Reply 10, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days ago) and read 4602 times:

Quoting GFA330 (Reply 8):
CDG MCT was his stupid idea. No loss for GF that he ran over to EY.
It was known before it was started that it had very little connex.

He did do a decent job at GF for years, maybe his last decision was a bad one...

I hope GF does well though.. checkmark ...

Cheers...



"Up the Irons!"
User currently offlineQatarA340 From Qatar, joined May 2006, 1818 posts, RR: 6
Reply 11, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days ago) and read 4593 times:

Apparently, the idea of a two hub is really loss-making. Having one hub will really boast its profit. But, of course that is not possible in this case--at least at the time being.


لا اله الا الله محمد رسول الله
User currently offlineJacobin777 From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 14968 posts, RR: 60
Reply 12, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days ago) and read 4579 times:

Quoting QatarA340 (Reply 11):
Apparently, the idea of a two hub is really loss-making. Having one hub will really boast its profit. But, of course that is not possible in this case--at least at the time being.

Why not? Why not have BAH as the only "home base" and build everything around from there..not to mention, increase tourism, finance, etc.....



"Up the Irons!"
User currently offlineHiJazzey From Saudi Arabia, joined Sep 2005, 866 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 4508 times:

Quoting Jacobin777 (Reply 12):

Why not? Why not have BAH as the only "home base" and build everything around from there..not to mention, increase tourism, finance, etc.....

Maybe because Oman as a shareholder in GF would not allow MCT being relegated to a focus city?

If Omanair picks up (which is still a while away since it's not as strongly financed as QR or EY), Oman will leave GF and then they can focus on BAH.


User currently offlineQatarA340 From Qatar, joined May 2006, 1818 posts, RR: 6
Reply 14, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 4486 times:

Quoting Jacobin777 (Reply 12):

Why not? Why not have BAH as the only "home base" and build everything around from there..not to mention, increase tourism, finance, etc.....

Actually, having two hubs is apparently very confusing for the airline. You might not see it, but it really does complicate things A LOT! Thoughout the years, with GF having four hubs really put a damper on profits. Also, spreading the resources over two cities and connecting the two for routes/frequencies will add stain for the GF finanicial situation.

Quoting HiJazzey (Reply 13):

Maybe because Oman as a shareholder in GF would not allow MCT being relegated to a focus city?

If Omanair picks up (which is still a while away since it's not as strongly financed as QR or EY), Oman will leave GF and then they can focus on BAH.

Right on. If BAH took the largest piece of the pie, Oman would certainly object. Back when DOH was shareholding, it was obligated to pay the same share; however, it had considerably less nonstop flights to certain destinations than neighboring BAH.



لا اله الا الله محمد رسول الله
User currently offlineSWISSER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 4361 times:

Quoting Behramjee (Reply 6):
GF has no plans for AMS what so ever.

Behramjee, you cannot denie that this destination has NOT been talked about this year, same as Shanghai, I' am not saying it's confirmed or anything, but the rumours still exist.
And I currently hear Casablanca is a possibility.

BTW, further rumours include a stop of the SYD leg (rumour for months now) and apparently the JNB is not a succes as well.

Welcome to Gussip-Air  Wink


User currently offlineRdwootty From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2005, 902 posts, RR: 2
Reply 16, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 4361 times:

This seems like a sheikout of the flight programme. I know when I am looking for connections with GF to the UAE states they are really dreadful with extended waits and long connections in both directions.It does seem a pity that the states cannot get together and run a code share programme.

User currently offlineKaran69 From India, joined Oct 2004, 2887 posts, RR: 18
Reply 17, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 4315 times:

Quoting Behramjee (Reply 6):

GF also flies an A 320 daily BAH-MCT-BOM which I dont know why as such a flight will never make money due to the operational costs of the route..

No mate, they have a daily early morning B763 from BAH-BOM [i have been on that], A Morning A320 flight that you mentioned above to MCT and an evening A320 on BOM-BAH sector---

No idea about the loads though but when i flew BOM-BAH [5J and Full in Y] and while comin back it was oversold in both classes.

Karan


User currently offlinePlanemanofnz From New Zealand, joined Sep 2005, 1676 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 4283 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Any plans for increasing DUB flights? I know that when GF started the route that there were several rumours that DUB would eventually see 5 weekly flights. Maybe 2 more flights a week could be connected to the SYD flight meaning that passengers don't have to stay a night in Bahrain going there?

Are first and business class succesfull on the DUB flights?

How are the JNB services going?


User currently offlinePilot21 From Ireland, joined Oct 1999, 1384 posts, RR: 2
Reply 19, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 4267 times:

Quoting Planemanofnz (Reply 18):
Maybe 2 more flights a week could be connected to the SYD flight meaning that passengers don't have to stay a night in Bahrain going there?

Speaking from opinion, not fact, GF would have to sell seats on a DUB-BAH-SYD route very cheaply as the SYD flight still goes through SIN if I read the routemap correctly. Doing that many jumps when EI and EK have agreed to start connecting in DXB on a 1 stop to SYD/MEL and PER makes no sense from a PAX point of view.
(And the new Winter DUB-DXB flights mean pax have a transfer of about 2.5hrs in DXB for onward OZ and Asia flights which is very good.)



Aircraft I've flown: A300/A310/A320/A321/A330/A340/B727/B732/B733/B734/B735/B738/B741/B742/B744/DC10/MD80/IL62/Bae146/AR
User currently offlineJacobin777 From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 14968 posts, RR: 60
Reply 20, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 4228 times:

Quoting QatarA340 (Reply 14):
Actually, having two hubs is apparently very confusing for the airline. You might not see it, but it really does complicate things A LOT! Thoughout the years, with GF having four hubs really put a damper on profits. Also, spreading the resources over two cities and connecting the two for routes/frequencies will add stain for the GF finanicial situation.

That's my point bro'..to make have GF focus on one hub.... Wink

Quoting HiJazzey (Reply 13):
Maybe because Oman as a shareholder in GF would not allow MCT being relegated to a focus city?

If Omanair picks up (which is still a while away since it's not as strongly financed as QR or EY), Oman will leave GF and then they can focus on BAH.

Sure, I have no problems with either Oman or Bahrain solving this..someone needs to "let go"..otherwise both (as well as GF) will lose...maybe Oman could be a "quiet" investor in GF (or vice-versa)....if GF does well, then Oman (Bahrain) makes money too... Smile



"Up the Irons!"
User currently offlineDZ09 From United States of America, joined Sep 2006, 491 posts, RR: 1
Reply 21, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 4098 times:

Flew to BAH recently from DXB for the first time. Out of all the gulf countries, I must say that Bahrain is the least attractive. They airport was definetely a disapointment compared to DXB, DOH or DMM. And what's with "toll fee" at the airport. First time I had to pay to enter a country. These maybe a few reasons why GF is not as successful or is losing marketshare.

User currently offlineGFA330 From Turkey, joined Oct 2006, 105 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 3952 times:

Quoting Jacobin777 (Reply 12):
Maybe because Oman as a shareholder in GF would not allow MCT being relegated to a focus city?

If Omanair picks up (which is still a while away since it's not as strongly financed as QR or EY), Oman will leave GF and then they can focus on BAH.

Going from a three hub to one hub would have been too big of step. Few issues why MCT is still in the game ;

- BAH itself does not have sufficient bilaterals to run a one hub operation with the fleet size of GF

- BAH gvt is sick of pooring money into GF and taking the ttl share was and still for sure not on their agenda. The only reason why they keep it alive is that 20% of BAH workforce works at GF.

- Omanair is at least 10 years away from being anything close to a decent carrier, but MCT govt has not been too happy either.

Quoting SWISSER (Reply 15):
And I currently hear Casablanca is a possibility.

was closed last year and defenitely NOT coming back

Quoting SWISSER (Reply 15):
BTW, further rumours include a stop of the SYD leg (rumour for months now) and apparently the JNB is not a succes as well

SYD reduction will not go ahead. JNB had a rough start but is no on it's feet and making money allbeit little

Quoting Planemanofnz (Reply 18):
Any plans for increasing DUB flights? I

5 a week is on the plan but not sure bilateral might be an issue ...
F and J are doing outstanding.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Rating Air Canada's New In Flight Entertainment posted Mon Aug 21 2006 21:13:23 by AIRCANL1011
Gulf Air A320 New Colours posted Wed Oct 6 2004 04:11:12 by BlueDuck
Gulf Air Opens New F/J Class Lounge At LHR posted Sat Sep 4 2004 01:36:20 by GF-A330
Gulf Air Plans New First And Business Class posted Sun Aug 31 2003 18:56:52 by GF-A330
Gulf Air A320 New C/s posted Wed Jun 18 2003 07:16:27 by Alpha
Gulf Air Planning New Routes posted Mon Mar 10 2003 16:32:38 by Airmale
Gulf Air Australia - New Site posted Tue Nov 6 2001 20:34:59 by GF-A330
Singapore And Gulf Air Suspends Flights To Egypt posted Mon Oct 8 2001 18:49:54 by RJ_Delta
Gulf Air Suspends Peshawar Service posted Wed Sep 19 2001 15:04:05 by Airmale
Gulf Air Needs A New Site, Do You Agree posted Fri May 18 2001 13:13:19 by GF-A330