Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Where Will UA Be In Three Years?  
User currently offlineZone1 From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 1035 posts, RR: 7
Posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 6535 times:

This isn't a UA bashing thread, I am just wondering where everyone thinks United will be in three years. Will they be stronger or weaker than they are now? Of the major U.S. airlines I feel that United is in the most precarious position. They still have fairly high costs even after bankruptcy. Of course, they have one of the strongest RASMs out there because they do offer a premium product people are willing to pay for. Will they be able to keep this RASM high as their airplanes get older and older? Since they are not allowed to buy any new planes any time soon, will people begin to refrain from flying UA if they have to fly an old 737s, 757s, or 767s?

One thing I am surprised at is the lack of point to point flying they have when other airlines are increasing it. It seems like most cities that UA flies to only have service to their hubs. This can be seen in the recent pull down of most non-hub flights from JFK. The only reason I can think of is because UA has many widely distributed hubs within the country, they really dont need as much point to point flying as an airline such as AA or DL.

With the recent announcement of FCO it is good to see that UA is willing to add more European flights. They already have been increasing frequencies (HKG and ICN) and reinstating flights (TPE) in Asia. Europe seemed to be left out until now.

I think UA's precarious position is also shown by the fact that they hired Goldman Sachs to explore "strategic options"--basically a merger partner. Just this week you have Tilton continuing to lobby for more foreign investment for U.S. airlines. With UA's strong free cash flow post bankruptcy, why is this necessary? I hope this isn't showing Tilton's idea of the future.

United is one of my most favorite airlines, and I have never had any horror stories with them. I usually try to fly them whenever possible because I enjoy their service and Ch. 9, of course! I hope UA is here to stay.


/// U N I T E D
29 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 30908 posts, RR: 87
Reply 1, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 6521 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I would not be surprised one bit if UA was actively trying to find a merger partner. Consolidation is going to have to happen to help smooth the "peaks and troughs" of the past two decades.

UA is more dependent on their partners in Star for service outside of North America and Asia then their domestic competitors are. On the plus side, that dependence allows UA to offer a larger pool of destinations which helps build traffic. A merger would allow them to leverage those connections as well as offer a merger partner more destinations to serve.


User currently offlineLijnden From Philippines, joined Apr 2003, 564 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 6504 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I think they will be at about the same level as they are today. They might order some 787's. I think they will focus the next 2-3 years on to how make the current network more profitable. I am not expecting any major changes or take-overs. If major changes are to happen, reasons should be searched on more external issues like fuel prices, terrorism and US-Dollar value.


Be kind to animals!
User currently offlineBobnwa From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 6465 posts, RR: 9
Reply 3, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 6474 times:

Quoting Zone1 (Thread starter):
Since they are not allowed to buy any new planes any time soon, will people begin to refrain from flying UA if they have to fly an old 737s, 757s, or 767s?

I disagree, most of the traveling public doesn't know a 737 from a Messerschmidt 109, nor do they care. I am exaggerating of course the the point is valid.


User currently offlineN174UA From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 994 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 6441 times:

Quoting Zone1 (Thread starter):
With the recent announcement of FCO it is good to see that UA is willing to add more European flights

Technically, IAD-FCO is a restart for UA. They operated it in the early 90's from IAD, and it continued to MXP, then back to IAD.

Quoting Zone1 (Thread starter):
Europe seemed to be left out until now.

Only because other routes to Asia, which you identified, offered higher probabilities of profit. Another issue is market economics...if one player has to leave a market and leaves a hole, such as AZ's decision to discontinue IAD-FCO, and if United can make it profitable, why not? Another thing too is that UA is leveraging (very well) it's relationship with LH and US. US offers flights to Europe to destinations that UA doesn't or won't, and therefore can code/revenue share with US on those flights.

Quoting Zone1 (Thread starter):
I think UA's precarious position is also shown by the fact that they hired Goldman Sachs to explore "strategic options"--basically a merger partner

Every airline, precarious or not, needs to understand the industry and the market very, very carefully. If you don't understand it, and your rival does, you lose....maybe even the company altoghether. Plain and simple. Rather than dedicating their own resources, Goldman specializes in industry analysis, and in a larger sense game theory, which is basically the idea of anticipating your rival's best response to a variety of possible scenarios. I for one hope Goldman doesn't come back and say "you should pursue US again".

Quoting Lijnden (Reply 2):
I think they will focus the next 2-3 years on to how make the current network more profitable. I am not expecting any major changes or take-overs

 checkmark  For now, yes. Though the industry landscape (US and EU) will change dramatically if EU-US is finally implemented. It's been agreed to in principle, but the EU won't implement it due to two issues not in the agreement, but related: 25% ownership cap and the ability of foreign execs. to play a significant role in the decision making processes at US airlines.

Quoting Bobnwa (Reply 3):
I disagree, most of the traveling public doesn't know a 737 from a Messerschmidt 109, nor do they care. I am exaggerating of course the the point is valid.

 checkmark  The flying public is very price sensitive for flights, and if they get that $99 fare on a 20 year old 737, it's fine with them. A lot of business travelers don't particularly care for the 757, but again...they too are much more price sensitive than in the past, so it's unlikely to affect a buy/no buy decision.


User currently offlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 30908 posts, RR: 87
Reply 5, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 6359 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting N174UA (Reply 4):
(Europe was left out o)nly because other routes to Asia, which you identified, offered higher probabilities of profit.

Yet UA's Asian operations provided the least amount of year-on-year profit growth due to the long stage-lengths and the consequent lower aircraft utilization ratio. That does not discount the fact that Asia is indeed profitable for UA, but UA could find a p.s. style 757 service to Europe and Latin America from beyond their hubs could provide significant profit growth, even against all the competition already present.


User currently offlineZone1 From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 1035 posts, RR: 7
Reply 6, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks ago) and read 6293 times:

Quoting Bobnwa (Reply 3):
I disagree, most of the traveling public doesn't know a 737 from a Messerschmidt 109, nor do they care. I am exaggerating of course the the point is valid.

But it isn't the mainstream flying public that is keeping UA's RASM so high. It is the 1Ks and UGS members. These people pay for a quality product, which UA delivers. The question is, will this quality product erode because UA can't purchase new aircraft, and will their high RASM also erode as a result.

Quoting N174UA (Reply 4):
I for one hope Goldman doesn't come back and say "you should pursue US again".

I hope so too. I hope that they come back and give them more ideas on how to increase operational efficiency. Maybe some more European cities can come out of it.

Quoting Stitch (Reply 5):
Yet UA's Asian operations provided the least amount of year-on-year profit growth due to the long stage-lengths and the consequent lower aircraft utilization ratio.

This is seen in WorldTraveler's post a couple of days ago about how each of the major carriers did last quarter according to the DOT. UA's Asian operations did not make money hand over fist, as some people think it does.



/// U N I T E D
User currently offlineWorldTraveler From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks ago) and read 6250 times:

UA's future depends a great deal on how strong the economy remains. They have been able to get by with high costs because they can get relatively high revenues. In an economic downturn, revenues fall while costs do not. UA will be in a world of hurt if the economy starts failing

The good news for UA is that their creditors put them on a very short leash - virtually no capital spending (in contrast to DL, US, and NW in the five years after their BKs) so they don't have huge non-operating expenses in the future.

They are also probably the most vulnerable if Virgin America starts up - and it is likely they will. UA also face challenges as every other US airline expands into Asia. As has been mentioned, UA does make a small profit to Asia but it should be much higher given the exposure and position they have there.

The best thing that could happen to UA is to be acquired but it likely will not happen unless someone can put together a pre-packaged bankruptcy that reduces their debt levels - most of which balloon by about 2012, IIRC.

While lots of people would like to see UA as an acquirer, that is not likely to happen unless UA's operating performance becomes at least average for the industry - something that is not likely to happen since they have the industry's highest costs.

UA is not on the verge of failure but in an industry where most other airlines have successfully restructured their finances and operations over the past 5 years, UA stands out as very vulnerable.

I would be surprised if UA will be here in 10 years, and possibly 5.


User currently offlineJacobin777 From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 14968 posts, RR: 60
Reply 8, posted (7 years 10 months 1 week 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 6182 times:

Quoting WorldTraveler (Reply 7):
They are also probably the most vulnerable if Virgin America starts up - and it is likely they will. UA also face challenges as every other US airline expands into Asia. As has been mentioned, UA does make a small profit to Asia but it should be much higher given the exposure and position they have there.

However, UA has been increasing its IAD hub, and it has great 5th freedom rights out of Japan which other carriers (besides NW) do not have...

Finally, its the one of the top two dominant carrier @ ORD, which is basically impossible to enter for a large-scale operation.....

ORD will be UA/AA for a long time to come....

Cheers..



"Up the Irons!"
User currently offlineATLAaron From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 1023 posts, RR: 3
Reply 9, posted (7 years 10 months 1 week 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 6153 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Bobnwa (Reply 3):
disagree, most of the traveling public doesn't know a 737 from a Messerschmidt 109, nor do they care. I am exaggerating of course the the point is valid.

Agreed and I don't think the 1k's care either. The only people who REALLY care about the aircraft are all of us loons on here.

Quoting N174UA (Reply 4):
A lot of business travelers don't particularly care for the 757

Why is that? I for one always think they seem cramped, but I still love the 757.

Quoting N174UA (Reply 4):
Goldman specializes in industry analysis, and in a larger sense game theory, which is basically the idea of anticipating your rival's best response to a variety of possible scenarios. I for one hope Goldman doesn't come back and say "you should pursue US again".

Investment banks like to recommend mergers though because it means big $$ for them. If a merger fails it is no big loss to them as long as they do not hold a lot of stock in the combined company. At that point they will have already collected their high fees.


User currently offlineHalls120 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (7 years 10 months 1 week 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 6138 times:

Quoting ATLAaron (Reply 9):
Quoting N174UA (Reply 4):A lot of business travelers don't particularly care for the 757
Why is that? I for one always think they seem cramped, but I still love the 757.

I like the 757. It has more F seats than the 320 or 733/5, meaning more chance of an upgrade.


User currently offlineBicoastal From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (7 years 10 months 1 week 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 6089 times:

UA will merge or be acquired. Every executive has repeated that mantra publicly. With the present administration in Washington, they have a two year window to make it happen. Barring a merger, no new airplanes until its debt to equity improves....likely an order in 2008 but no deliveries for a few more years. Most expansion and new point to point service will be done by United Express regional partners. IAM union contract expires in 2009. Expect a bloodbath as the company tries to eliminate union employees at many stations in favor of contractors. Customer service and ramp employees are in for major changes/cuts. A downturn in the economy or other outside disaster will force the company back to Chapter 11 bankruptcy.

....just a few things in my crystal ball.

[Edited 2006-10-22 03:25:40]

User currently offlineSupa7E7 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (7 years 10 months 1 week 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 6086 times:

UA is a great body in search of a new brain.

User currently offlineUnited767 From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 356 posts, RR: 5
Reply 13, posted (7 years 10 months 1 week 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 6074 times:

Quoting Bicoastal (Reply 11):
Customer service and ramp employees are in for major changes/cuts.

You cant get blood from a turnip.

Quoting Bicoastal (Reply 11):
Expect a bloodbath as the company tries to eliminate union employees at many stations in favor of contractors.

I agree, but in this case the blood will be spilling from managment, as the workers who have taken so much pay and benefit cuts already will not stand for it.



I wish UA flew mainline to MYR, that way you wouldn't be stuck in a smelly Saturn for 12 hours.
User currently offlineZone1 From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 1035 posts, RR: 7
Reply 14, posted (7 years 10 months 1 week 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 6054 times:

Quoting ATLAaron (Reply 9):

Why is that? I for one always think they seem cramped, but I still love the 757.

The 757 is a great plane. Nothing beats a 757 take off!

Quoting WorldTraveler (Reply 7):
that reduces their debt levels - most of which balloon by about 2012, IIRC.

Hopefully they will be using their large free cash flow right now to pay off debt, so this doesn't happen.

Quoting ATLAaron (Reply 9):
Agreed and I don't think the 1k's care either. The only people who REALLY care about the aircraft are all of us loons on here.

This may be true, but they will have to do some refurbishing of these cabins at some point. The 767s already are in need of new first class seats. If they don't upgrade the cabins then they might lose 1k's.



/// U N I T E D
User currently offlineATLAaron From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 1023 posts, RR: 3
Reply 15, posted (7 years 10 months 1 week 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 6042 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Zone1 (Reply 14):
If they don't upgrade the cabins then they might lose 1k's.

The reason I do not think that will happen is because if they go somewhere else like AA, they won't have all of their perks. The traveler would have to start all over.


User currently offlineBicoastal From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (7 years 10 months 1 week 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 6042 times:

Quoting United767 (Reply 13):
You cant get blood from a turnip

Sure you can. It's called, "hire AirServe, Swissport, Menzies, DGS, TIMCO, PrimeFlight or any other contractor that submits a bid....regardless of quality and ability to speak English."


User currently offlineJacobin777 From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 14968 posts, RR: 60
Reply 17, posted (7 years 10 months 1 week 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 6023 times:

Quoting Zone1 (Reply 14):
The 757 is a great plane. Nothing beats a 757 take off!

The 757 rocks!!.. bigthumbsup 




"Up the Irons!"
User currently offlinePlanecrazy2 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 615 posts, RR: 4
Reply 18, posted (7 years 10 months 1 week 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 6016 times:

Quoting ATLAaron (Reply 15):
The reason I do not think that will happen is because if they go somewhere else like AA, they won't have all of their perks. The traveler would have to start all over.

What if they get comped to at least mid tier? Sure it might not be what they had as a 1K but it's nowhere near starting all over. Not that I would want to see any UA flyer go to the DAARK side... crying 



United Airlines - Worldwide Service
User currently offlineZone1 From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 1035 posts, RR: 7
Reply 19, posted (7 years 10 months 1 week 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 5994 times:

Quoting ATLAaron (Reply 15):

The reason I do not think that will happen is because if they go somewhere else like AA, they won't have all of their perks.

Not necessarily. I know AA has a program where if you sign up you will get elite status if you fly 5,000 miles in 90 days. If you fly 10,000 miles you get Platinum status. This isn't too hard for your average 1k flyer. You can read about it here: http://money.cnn.com/2006/07/05/pf/goodlife.fortune/index.htm



/// U N I T E D
User currently offlineN174UA From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 994 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (7 years 10 months 1 week 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 5977 times:

Quoting Stitch (Reply 5):
Yet UA's Asian operations provided the least amount of year-on-year profit growth due to the long stage-lengths and the consequent lower aircraft utilization ratio. That does not discount the fact that Asia is indeed profitable for UA

See the portion in bold. This is all that matters to UA right now, post Ch. 11.

Quoting Stitch (Reply 5):
but UA could find a p.s. style 757 service to Europe and Latin America from beyond their hubs could provide significant profit growth, even against all the competition already present.

See my reply to Zone1 below...

Quoting Zone1 (Reply 6):
I hope so too. I hope that they come back and give them more ideas on how to increase operational efficiency. Maybe some more European cities can come out of it.

Depends on a.) the future profitability prospects on such routes and b.) aircraft availability. Again, if UA can leverage the US/LH partnership, then they can still win even though their own metal isn't on the route. Absent of internal confidential data, I don't see the IAD-FCO route working out long term.

Quoting ATLAaron (Reply 9):
Why is that? I for one always think they seem cramped

yes...I believe that's the common perception, and hence the dislike.

Quoting Bicoastal (Reply 11):
IAM union contract expires in 2009. Expect a bloodbath as the company tries to eliminate union employees at many stations in favor of contractors.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the F/A AND the Pilots contract expire then, too. Hmm....think I'd rather spend a day at the dentist.  Yeah sure

Quoting Zone1 (Reply 14):
The 757 is a great plane. Nothing beats a 757 take off!

Don't get me wrong...I love that airplane, you'll never here me complain about it. But my understanding is that travelling businesspeople feel cramped in it...maybe they're used to being on a widebody, and the -57 is a narrowbody, I don't know.


User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 21, posted (7 years 10 months 1 week 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 5939 times:

Quoting Zone1 (Reply 19):
I know AA has a program where if you sign up you will get elite status if you fly 5,000 miles in 90 days. If you fly 10,000 miles you get Platinum status.

I never heard of that... 5000 miles is just one JFK-SFO roundtrip.

NS


User currently offlineUnited767 From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 356 posts, RR: 5
Reply 22, posted (7 years 10 months 1 week 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 5910 times:

Quoting Bicoastal (Reply 16):
Sure you can. It's called, "hire AirServe, Swissport, Menzies, DGS, TIMCO, PrimeFlight or any other contractor that submits a bid....regardless of quality and ability to speak English."

LOL, your right about the english part.



I wish UA flew mainline to MYR, that way you wouldn't be stuck in a smelly Saturn for 12 hours.
User currently offlineATLAaron From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 1023 posts, RR: 3
Reply 23, posted (7 years 10 months 1 week 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 5847 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Gigneil (Reply 21):
I never heard of that... 5000 miles is just one JFK-SFO roundtrip.

You are correct and I believe Zone1 to be incorrect. Copied and pasted from the link Zone1 provided.

"It works like this: If you know you will be making a bunch of trips in the next three months, sign up before you begin. Free enrollment starts on the 1st or 16th of the month and lasts 90 days.

During that time you need to earn 5,000 points or 16 segments for Gold status, and twice that for Platinum. (Super discounted tickets earn half a point per mile flown, regular coach tickets earn one point and full-fare coach, business and first class earn 1.5 points per mile.)"

Points not miles.


User currently offlineZone1 From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 1035 posts, RR: 7
Reply 24, posted (7 years 10 months 1 week 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 5816 times:

Quoting ATLAaron (Reply 23):

During that time you need to earn 5,000 points or 16 segments for Gold status, and twice that for Platinum. (Super discounted tickets earn half a point per mile flown, regular coach tickets earn one point and full-fare coach, business and first class earn 1.5 points per mile.)"

I guess it works just like the usual AA elite qualifying point system. I should have specifically said that since unlike other airlines you don't get an EQP for every mile you fly on some tickets with AA. I'm glad DL did away with that when they did.

Quoting N174UA (Reply 20):
But my understanding is that travelling businesspeople feel cramped in it.

It feels cramped in the way back sometimes, but up in E+ it's awesome! It's great to sit in row 8/9--infinite leg room. I also feel that the 757 first class cabin is very nice. People usually don't walk by you since boarding is usually done from the second door. A lav and galley also separates the two cabins. These features make for a nice secluded flying experience up front.

[Edited 2006-10-22 07:13:20]


/// U N I T E D
25 QF108 : Im really hoping UA continue to head in the right direction. Having tried several different US carriers, UA is my preffered option, Ch.9 is the real c
26 UAL777UK : And boy would i love to see one of them offering a continuing service to AKL. In my dreams!
27 MEACEDAR : What if they merge with a "mediocre" airline, like Southwest JetBlue, or when Virgin America starts up. Would that help them in the future?
28 Hiflyer : First off...Goldman Sachs is about acquisition/consolidation....not selling UA. Tilton wants UA larger with the least cost. The billions of bucks in t
29 JJeff : Me too. Same reason. (And I am a 1K.)
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Where Will We Be In 10 Years Time posted Tue Jan 25 2005 17:15:19 by LHRCS
Where Will We Be In 3 Years? posted Sat Jun 19 2004 08:26:42 by Jetdeltamsy
Where Will PIT Be In The New HP/US Deal? posted Tue May 17 2005 18:28:14 by Jdwfloyd
How Do You Think Airplanes Will Be In 100+ Years? posted Fri May 4 2001 04:37:13 by Lukino99
Where Will UA 747s Go? posted Fri Oct 27 2006 18:40:15 by MEACEDAR
Where Will WN Grow In 2007? posted Mon Oct 16 2006 01:53:30 by SANFan
Will A380 Be In Virgin Colours On Heathrow Visit posted Sat Apr 29 2006 16:54:09 by HARLEYF150
EI Doubles Route Network In Three Years posted Mon May 23 2005 10:56:49 by BestWestern
Will Southwest Be In COS By 2006? posted Sun Apr 18 2004 16:53:10 by Yanksn4
Jetstar - Where Will IT BE Based? posted Tue Jan 6 2004 04:11:44 by Nitro500