Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why NOT -- AA To GEO And PMB?  
User currently offlineAJMIA From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 733 posts, RR: 15
Posted (7 years 12 months 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 5244 times:

With the mess going on at BWIA I am seeing a lot of passengers flying AA to BGI and POS, then making connections to PMB and GEO. Just this year I am seeing a lot more GEO & PMB passengers than I have ever seen before.

This may be a good time for AA to make a run at these markets from MIA.

Once BWIA changes their name to Caribbean Star (dumb idea as far as I am concerned) they will loose alot of their brand recognition on the route.

AJMIA


Lady it's a jet... not a kite.
12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTrintocan From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2000, 3240 posts, RR: 4
Reply 1, posted (7 years 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 5193 times:

That is actually a perennial question. AA does have an agent in GEO and has toyed with flying there on occasion but has never actually done so.

GEO is not a particularly high-yield destination and is actually a fairly small travel market. Most of the traffic there is VFR and brand loyalty to BW, which is the largest carrier to it, is very strong. Guyanese airlines such as Guyana Airways and more recently Universal have tried to maintain more direct routes to the US and Canada but have folded for a variety of reasons. To JFK, too, there is NA which has actually been very successful to GEO and has had Guyana as its main scheduled destination for many years. With this combination of carriers to this relatively small destination there is little room for AA though it may well try in the future.

As for PBM, the same is largely true except that Suriname's population is even smaller and the strong, former colonial ties with The Netherlands means that a huge proportion of the travel market from there is to AMS rather than to North America. Suriname Airways and BW provide links to the USA. An AA presence there is even less likely.

TrinToCan.



Hop to it, fly for life!
User currently offlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 33041 posts, RR: 71
Reply 2, posted (7 years 12 months 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 5063 times:

There is definitley potential for AA to fly MIA-GEO and MIA-PBM, 3x weekly each, as well as MIA-CAY. I don't think we will see it happen soon, but in the more long-term future (3-4 years) it would not surprise me.


a.
User currently offlineMauriceB From Netherlands, joined Aug 2004, 2490 posts, RR: 25
Reply 3, posted (7 years 12 months 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 5047 times:

Why would they wan't to launch MIA-PBM? There arent much flights to PBM, only from Holland because of the Surinam people living here, and there is hardly any toerism business there...

User currently offlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 33041 posts, RR: 71
Reply 4, posted (7 years 12 months 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 5018 times:

Quoting MauriceB (Reply 3):
Why would they wan't to launch MIA-PBM? There arent much flights to PBM, only from Holland because of the Surinam people living here, and there is hardly any toerism business there...

Excellent yields and a sizeable Surinam community in South Florida, plus cargo revenue. Let's say they fly three weekly 738s. The flights average load factor would definitley be low - probably in the high-40s/low-50s, but the yields and cargo revenue could make the flight very profitable. Also, new air links can develop tourism links.



a.
User currently offlineWA707atMSP From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 2247 posts, RR: 8
Reply 5, posted (7 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 4899 times:

Could GEO, PBM, or CAY be served by an American Eagle ATR-72 out of SJU, or are they beyond the ATR-72's range?


Seaholm Maples are #1!
User currently offlineCaptaink From Mexico, joined May 2001, 5109 posts, RR: 12
Reply 6, posted (7 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 4893 times:

Quoting AJMIA (Thread starter):
Once BWIA changes their name to Caribbean Star (dumb idea as far as I am concerned) they will loose alot of their brand recognition on the route.

They are changing to Caribbean Airlines, but yes the thought continues, very dumb idea.

While on that AA, could do well with a few flights into GND every week. While a small island, we can sustain a few more carriers, maybe not on a daily flight but 3 times weekly sounds good to me.



There is something special about planes....
User currently offlineSJUSXM From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 294 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (7 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 4861 times:

Would love to see this happen

maybe 3 or 4 weekly 738's from MIA



AT7, ER3, ER4, ER5, CR7, E70, E75, F100, M82, M83, 722, 732, 738, 752, 762, 763, AB6, 320, 321, 772, 77W
User currently offlineMaverickM11 From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 17661 posts, RR: 46
Reply 8, posted (7 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 4840 times:

I think any two of those three cities (CAY, PBM, GEO) would be one of those rare cases where they'd do well as a roundabout (ie MIA-PBM-GEO-MIA) since they are low load factor markets separately, close together, and somewhat high yield.


E pur si muove -Galileo
User currently offlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 33041 posts, RR: 71
Reply 9, posted (7 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day ago) and read 4803 times:

Quoting MaverickM11 (Reply 8):
I think any two of those three cities (CAY, PBM, GEO) would be one of those rare cases where they'd do well as a roundabout (ie MIA-PBM-GEO-MIA) since they are low load factor markets separately, close together, and somewhat high yield.

Very good point. I agree that a round about could work. GEO, however, can actually do a good job filling a plane, but it is heavily seasonal. I think that AA could serve all three by doing, for example, MIA-GEO-CAY-MIA 2x weekly and MIA-PBM-GEO-MIA 2x weekly, with 738s.

Getting to Cayenne from the US mainland is a huge pain. The quickest way to get there is Air France's MIA-CAY flight, but it is a hopper flight that stops in FDF and PTP. AF's MIA-CAY service is blocked at a longer time than their own CAY-ORY non-stop!



a.
User currently offlineAirFranceJFK From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 480 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (7 years 11 months 4 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 4755 times:

With the presence of BW and NA on the JFK-GEO route, don't expect to see AA there anytime soon. The route simply cannot sustain 3 airlines yearround. MIA has a much smaller expatriate population than NYC and it's pretty well served by one airline year round, in this case, BW.

It would probabily take at least one of these airlines dropping out of the picture before AA decides to venture in.


User currently offlineMrPIBB From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (7 years 11 months 4 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 4736 times:

Quoting Trintocan (Reply 1):
To JFK, too, there is NA which has actually been very successful to GEO



Quoting Trintocan (Reply 1):
With this combination of carriers to this relatively small destination there is little room for AA though it may well try in the future.

Lets face it, if AA were to start a JFK-GEO route, how long do you think it would take for NA to run yelping for the hills? AA would not consider NA to be much of an obstacle if they wanted to start a route. And for that matter, I doubt this new silly re-incarnation of BW would be much of a problem for AA in any market either. I predict an even bigger AA presence in the Carib area in the very near future with both BW and JM floundering about as they are.


User currently offlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 33041 posts, RR: 71
Reply 12, posted (7 years 11 months 4 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 4729 times:

Quoting AirFranceJFK (Reply 10):
With the presence of BW and NA on the JFK-GEO route, don't expect to see AA there anytime soon.

I doubt AA sees either as a threat. Also, any AA service to GEO would be from MIA.



a.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why JAA And Not JAL To Taiwan? And Why Not Arabs? posted Thu Jul 29 2004 19:43:53 by Airmale
LGW -why Not A Tunnel To Pier 2, North Terminal posted Tue Oct 24 2006 15:22:31 by TimRees
One World: Why Not AA/BA Transatlantic Mileage posted Wed Jul 26 2006 17:43:46 by Eastern023
Gate Occupied Why Not Switched To Alternate Gate posted Mon Jul 18 2005 15:50:07 by Ultrapig
Jet2 - Why Not Operating To Brussels? posted Fri May 13 2005 12:33:47 by Sabena 690
Why No AA To SYD? posted Mon Apr 5 2004 23:03:44 by Aa777jr
Why Not Frontier To CLT? posted Thu Jan 9 2003 14:20:57 by B764
AA To Rome And Barcelona posted Wed Dec 18 2002 04:14:28 by Tbird
Why No AA To Ams? posted Tue Jun 25 2002 03:35:26 by KL808
Why Are AA Not Good Enough And We Need To Have D posted Thu Nov 11 1999 04:59:50 by Iainhol