Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
German Govt. To Buy Into Airbus Via The Back Door?  
User currently offlineNAV20 From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 9909 posts, RR: 36
Posted (7 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 3643 times:

According to this story, the German Government has found a way of de facto buying out part of Daimler-Chrysler's share in EADS by using 'Quasi-Government' institutions to do the actual share-buying.

"The German government has so far been undecided about how to shore up German interests when DaimlerChrysler reduces its stake. It has been reluctant for the state to acquire the stake directly, preferring instead a private-sector solution.

"Complex deal - WirtschaftsWoche noted that DaimlerChrysler does not hold the stake directly, but via a non-operative subsidiary, DASA. DASA's share capital is held by DaimlerChrysler, the city state authorities of Hamburg, the Dornier family and the Messerschmitt Foundation.

"Under the complex deal, DASA would issue a convertible bond with a value of up to 49 percent of its enterprise value.

"EADS susidiary Airbus is hurting, but has gotten some big orders recently

"The bond, which would be convertible into the EADS shares, would be bought by a privately led investor consortium that included a number of public-sector regional state banks and the state-owned KfW redevelopment bank, WirtschaftsWoche reported.

"DASA would use the money from the bond issue to reimburse its shareholders, enabling DaimlerChrysler to pocket more money than it would raise from the sale of its shares via the open stock market, the magazine said.

"At the same time, Daimler-Chrysler would hold on to its EADS voting rights until the bond came up for redemption. Such a construction would also help to fend off potential predators, the magazine said.

"Chancellor Angela Merkel was scheduled to talk over the solution with the French and German EADS co-chairmen, Louis Gallois and Thomas Enders, at a meeting in Berlin in the next few days, WirtschaftsWoche added."


http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,2144,2216967,00.html

Possibly most of us can agree that:-

1. The last thing that Airbus needs is yet more interference from politicians.

2. Airbus' current situation is far too precarious/uncertain for the company to be a sutiable investment for taxpayers' money/savings to be invested in it to reduce Daimler-Chrysler's exposure?

Just on a personal note, can't resist saying that the fact that the 'Messerchmitt Foundation' still appears to be going strong, and planning to invest in Airbus, appeals to my quirky sense of humour.

Until this very moment, I'd assumed that I'd finished with those b*****d Messerschmitts after getting bombed by one of them (as a very small child, on my way home from nursery school) in 1944...........

[Edited 2006-10-29 15:18:44]


"Once you have flown, you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards.." - Leonardo da Vinci
3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineLeskova From Germany, joined Oct 2003, 6075 posts, RR: 70
Reply 1, posted (7 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 3610 times:

Agreed on 1, don't agree on 2.

But to the actual article, buying via the KfW was the plan from the beginning, so this really isn't anything new... perhaps a bit more detail, but that's it.



Smile - it confuses people!
User currently offlineNAV20 From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 9909 posts, RR: 36
Reply 2, posted (7 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 3596 times:

About '2.', Leskova, it's pretty clear that Daimler-Chrysler are anxious to 'do a BAE' and get out from under, as far as they can.

I've no quarrel with that - if I was still in business, I'd have done the same long since. But I think that they should take their chances in the market, as BAE had to - not have taxpayer-funded institutions guarantee them a 'soft landing.'



"Once you have flown, you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards.." - Leonardo da Vinci
User currently offlineLeskova From Germany, joined Oct 2003, 6075 posts, RR: 70
Reply 3, posted (7 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 3561 times:

Quoting NAV20 (Reply 2):
But I think that they should take their chances in the market, as BAE had to - not have taxpayer-funded institutions guarantee them a 'soft landing.

And I fully agree with that - what I don't agree with is your assessment that Airbus' "current situation is far too precarious/uncertain for the company to be a sutiable investment for taxpayers".

Aside from that, I'm also not at all convinced that DC wants to get out of the whole company as fast as possible... or at all... undoubtedly, they want to reduce their share, but so far I haven't seen any reports (outside of a.net-gossip) that went anywhere close to saying that they want to get out alltogether.



Smile - it confuses people!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
South African Govt To Buy Airline Back From Swiss posted Sun Nov 25 2001 21:14:48 by Covert
Qantas Wants To Buy Into Adam Air posted Sun Feb 5 2006 07:53:03 by PanAm_DC10
Cyprus Govt To Buy Eurocypria - Just In Case! posted Thu Dec 29 2005 16:15:14 by 7LBAC111
HK's Cathay Pacific To Buy Boeing, Airbus Aircraft posted Wed Apr 14 2004 09:12:55 by Alexchao
Richard Branson To Buy Into ACA? posted Fri Aug 8 2003 07:15:51 by WMUPilot
SIA Chairman: No Intention To Buy Into DJ.. Yet posted Fri Jun 28 2002 14:39:18 by Singapore_Air
Rumour: NZ Govt. To Buy 80% Of ANZ posted Thu Oct 4 2001 00:11:00 by Singapore_Air
Lufthansa To Buy Into Eurowings? posted Sat Sep 16 2000 12:37:10 by B737-700
Qantas To Buy Into MAS posted Thu Sep 14 2000 05:44:01 by Sp-deluxe
Can Airbus Send The A350 Back To Redesign? posted Thu Dec 15 2005 08:09:41 by MrComet