Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
There Is Nothing Like Good Old Low Fare Carriers!  
User currently offlineCo LITE From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (13 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 1399 times:

My Favorite Airlines would be the Low Fare Carriers of course. The Reasons Why I pick Them:

-Most Have Good Safety Records
-Fun Flight Attendants
-Peanuts And Coca-Cola
-Most likely a 737 or DC-9
-Great Cheap Fares
-And good times for all!

If you have some other stuff to add, please respond. I would be interested  

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineRunway From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (13 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 1365 times:

-People who normaly wouldn't fly, fly.
-Increased competition
-Dirty inflight movies
-Smoking flights


Runway  


User currently offlineBH346 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 3265 posts, RR: 14
Reply 2, posted (13 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 1345 times:

Yup, I mostly like them because they bring in competition.

BH346



Northwest Airlines - Some People Just Know How to Fly
User currently offlineDCA-ROCguy From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 4499 posts, RR: 33
Reply 3, posted (13 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 1319 times:

Dear CO Lite,

Hear, hear. Low-fare carriers hold the oligopoly carriers accountable to the communities they serve. I truly believe that without Southwest, JetBlue, AirTran, et al., that the oligopoly carriers would restrict air travel to the small, steady stream of wealthy travelers who can afford gouge fares. Sure, Orlando and Las Vegas would be priced for vacations, but as for everybody else forget it.

The promise of deregulation--air travel for all--truly depends upon low-fare carriers. As you say, they have sterling safety records, they tend to be fun to fly, and offer jets to cities and routes that otherwise would be doomed to teeth-rattling props or nothing at all.

The story of how Big Air used the media to libel and defame low-fare carriers after the very anomalous Valujet crash in 1996 (which was caused by cargo, not the plane or pilots!) is a Pulitzer Prize waiting to be won.

My Thanksgiving trip home says it all. US wanted $500 for DCA-ROC, with two months' notice ("Sorry, sir, all two low-fare seats on the 150-seat aircraft are sold already"). So I'm driving 15 extra minutes to BWI, and flying Southwest to BUF for $118, and driving 65 miles to Rochester from there. Steve Wolf wants to subsidize his $123 million golden parachute on my grad student back. He can go shove that parachute where it won't fit well.

Jim K.
Washington, DC



Need a new airline paint scheme? Better call Saul! (Bass that is)
User currently offlineAirmale From Botswana, joined Sep 2004, 377 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (13 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 1306 times:

i agree id rather fly cheap than have all those frills, because travelling from Pakistan is very expensive, but i would like the airline to sport a beautiful livery and not cram in people like on a charter airline 


.....up there with the best!
User currently onlineMEA-707 From Netherlands, joined Nov 1999, 4315 posts, RR: 36
Reply 5, posted (13 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 1306 times:

I agree, most no frill flights I had were fun and with more personal and down to earth service. I loved Spirit, ATA and Vanguard in the US (let's forget about AirTran which damaged my luggage), easyJet and Ryanair in Europe, Bouraq in Indonesia and Aerolineas Internacionales in Mexico, but didn't get no dirty movies  


nobody has ever died from hard work, but why take the risk?
User currently offlineGreggj From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (13 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 1305 times:

What difference does having a 'beautiful livery' have to do this?

User currently offlineSegmentKing From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (13 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 1290 times:

I miss Kiwi International Airlines *tear* (part 1 mind you)

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
What Is It Like Working For A Low-fare Carrier? posted Fri Aug 8 2003 06:05:22 by Pilottim747
Low-fare Carriers In Taipei posted Thu Aug 24 2006 04:08:54 by Surrenr
Low-Fare Carriers Highest Cust Service Rankings posted Mon Apr 3 2006 17:06:09 by DAYflyer
How Have Low-Fare Carriers Affected Industry posted Wed Mar 3 2004 16:11:56 by A330Fan1
Low Fare Carriers Flying International? posted Thu Dec 25 2003 21:41:50 by Howdy
Why No Transatlantic Low-Fare Carriers? posted Sun Oct 19 2003 06:01:49 by Birdwatching
Will Low-fare Carriers Rule The Skies? posted Sat Oct 18 2003 09:15:00 by Swafan
LUFTHANSA, Is It Ready For New Low Cost Carriers? posted Mon Oct 14 2002 10:38:18 by Keesje
Article: Low-Fare Carriers Grow Since Sept.11 posted Sat Dec 15 2001 18:36:24 by Airplanelover
Service Qualities On Low Fare Carriers posted Tue Aug 14 2001 23:26:43 by Co LITE