Personally I see the 'new' AZ livery as a revised version of the old livery just as the small changes to the BA and slightly larger changes to the RG liveries are revisions.
As for it being
Quoting UAL777UK (Reply 3): A complete waste of time, effort and most importantly money!!
It is a waste of time if it was announced with a great fanfare. But I do not see where the effort was made. But otherwise . . . Well AZ certainly did not spend a small fortune with a design bureau and I guess there is a saving in the cost of green paint partly balanced by a rise in the cost of red paint.
Steeler83 From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 9197 posts, RR: 20
Reply 12, posted (7 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 8184 times:
If it was me in charge of designing a new livery concept, I would have a red stripe going up the front side of the tail fin, with the back part of it being solid red. I would have "Allitalia Airlines" in big font times new roman across the sides of the fucelage, with "Allitalia" being in red and "Airlines" being in green paint... This would not exactly be an all-white livery, and it certainly would not cost too much I don't think, but that's just me...
Do not bring stranger girt into your room. The stranger girt is dangerous, it will hurt your life.
ExFATboy From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 2974 posts, RR: 9
Reply 13, posted (7 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 8176 times:
Well, it's a small incremental change, not a major rebranding - they couldn't really afford that right now. I'm sort of "eh" about the whole thing - I'm a big fan of window-level cheat lines, and I liked the "Snoopy nose." That said, it's not a bad evolutionary design, and at least they didn't go "Eurowhite."