Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
L1011F Vs DC-10F  
User currently offlineClipperNo1 From Germany, joined May 1999, 672 posts, RR: 2
Posted (14 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 1196 times:

By now there have been only a few conversions of TriStars into freighters, while almost every DC-10 has been converted. The only 'bigger' Freight Line using a L1011F is Fine Air. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the safety record of L1011s is better than the ones of the DC10s. The only big L1011 crash I remember is DL191 (shearwinds). I think the L1011 has always been more advanced than the DC-10. There are for sure more DC-10's at the market, but in the recent a lot of L1011 have been retiered from pax-ops (Cathay, Delta, Saudia, Royal Joradanian.....), most of them became victims of the blowtorch instead of being converted into a freighter.
So why are there almost only DC-10F's???


"I really don't know one plane from the other. To me they are just marginal costs with wings."� Alfred Kahn, 1977
4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offline767-400ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (14 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days ago) and read 1192 times:

Many factors in this:
Its the spares cost and aviablity of the L-1011 are far less spares then the DC-10.

Also the avalibilty of the plane it self is far less then the DC-10, were you can find for of them, the cost of one of them, and the cost of operating.

It could also be, I'm not really sure, that the L-1011 might be using different size containers then standard LD-3 used by 747s, Airbus widebodys, DC-10, and maybe the 777. There are standard in carry cargo.


Rooz


User currently offlineBoeing727 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 950 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (14 years 9 months 3 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 1192 times:

Although I love the old L1011s, I have to admit that the DC10 can haul more cargo than the TRISTAR (mainly because of its #2 engine location).

Regards


User currently offlineBryanG From United States of America, joined May 1999, 429 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (14 years 9 months 3 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 1192 times:

The L-1011s use the same LD-3 and main deck boards as the DC-10, so it's not a configuration issue. I had the rare pleasure of working on an L-1011F, and it was a nice plane. Max payload was about 120,000 lb. Don't know the load for the DC-10, but I'd imagine that it's a bit more. It's true that the DC-10 does have more internal volume, and that's an important factor in the cargo biz. Often planes "bulk-out", meaning that when they haul lighter cargo their loads are limited not by weight but by space.

I'd guess that a more important reason is the effort of upkeep. Passenger charter airlines can dictate their own flying schedules, but cargo ops need high reliabnility and easy maintainaility. Sadly, the Tristar is ancient history to Lockheed, so the only source of spare parts is retired planes. Some Tristars must be sacrificed to the desert so that they're luckier bretheren may fly on...

Lots of L-1011s are being used a lot in the passenger charter biz, whereas not many old DC-10s are being fitted for passenger ops. So at least the L-1011s that are still around are being enjoyed by people rather than boxes. Either way, they're still turing a profit to whoever uses them.


User currently offlineClipperNo1 From Germany, joined May 1999, 672 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (14 years 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 1193 times:

I don't think that TriStars are so profitable to Charter Airlines! The main reason they use them I think, is because they don't have to care about ETOPS when flying over the 'big pond'.


"I really don't know one plane from the other. To me they are just marginal costs with wings."� Alfred Kahn, 1977
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
New DC-10F Operator In Bolivia posted Mon Aug 27 2007 00:47:49 by OceansWorld
MD-11 VS DC-10 posted Thu Aug 31 2006 19:26:03 by Eastern023
737-200 Vs. Dc 9 Vs. Bac 1-11 posted Sun Jun 18 2006 16:32:00 by Columba
707 Vs DC-8 posted Thu Apr 13 2006 19:35:28 by FlyDreamliner
707F Vs. DC-8F posted Fri Nov 18 2005 01:47:51 by Warreng24
NW Airbi Vs DC-9's In BUF. posted Mon Sep 12 2005 01:30:04 by United_fan
707 Vs. DC-8: Re-engined posted Wed Jul 21 2004 02:44:15 by Cancidas
MD-81 Vs. DC-9-81 posted Sat May 15 2004 15:52:34 by N9801F
DC-10 30 Vs DC-10 40 posted Thu Mar 18 2004 21:18:34 by Hawaii50
Battle Of The Midgets - 737 Vs. DC-9 posted Wed Mar 17 2004 23:23:39 by MakeMinesLax