Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Northwest Ponders Cargo Center At DTW Or YIP  
User currently offlineKarlB737 From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 3105 posts, RR: 10
Posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 5138 times:

Courtesy: The Detroit News

Northwest Ponders Cargo Center At DTW Or YIP

http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll...e?AID=/20061104/BIZ/611040352/1001

27 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineTjwgrr From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 2444 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 5123 times:

Great news for Detroit (DTW/ YIP) if it all comes together.

With YIP's longest runway at just over 7500', I'm sure a runway extension at YIP would be needed for a heavily loaded 742F to make it to ANC or beyond.



Direct KNOBS, maintain 2700' until established on the localizer, cleared ILS runway 26 left approach.
User currently offlineIsitsafenow From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 4984 posts, RR: 23
Reply 2, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 5039 times:

It will never happen at YIP...Kalitta is now crying for longer runways and NW will need them for ANC, Europe and the Orient. How about Selfridge in Macomb county?
safe



If two people agree on EVERYTHING, then one isn't necessary.
User currently offlineHumberside From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2005, 4920 posts, RR: 4
Reply 3, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 5032 times:

What flights are there at YIP at the moment?


Visit the Air Humberside Website and Forum
User currently offlineLegend11 From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 107 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 5024 times:

How about TOL. Bax Global has a 220,000 sq ft sort facility and a 50 acre ramp along side a 10000ft rwy. The facility was built by the city and leased to BAX, which has an operation much smaller than back in the 90's.

User currently offlineBurnsie28 From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 7546 posts, RR: 8
Reply 5, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 5000 times:

It would make more sense at DTW, remember some "CARGO" does go on NW mainline flights.


"Some People Just Know How To Fly"- Best slogan ever, RIP NW 1926-2009
User currently offlinePSU.DTW.SCE From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 7591 posts, RR: 27
Reply 6, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 4980 times:

Interesting concept if it were to come to head. DTW has the space to make it happen, YIP is lacking the runways. The deal-breaker is getting decent rail access, which both airports have adjacent to their property.

Selfridge isn't even realistic, since its military-controlled.


User currently offlinePanHAM From Germany, joined May 2005, 9386 posts, RR: 29
Reply 7, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 4960 times:

Cargo goes on both passenger and cargo aircraft, for the sake of connectivity, such a facility can only be at DTW. YIP does not stand a chance, not only because of runway lenght.

Interesting to know what good a railspur would do. Rail and air does not interchangem at least not in the US. Here in Europe, we have some projects, it ha sbeen done between Germany/Switzerland and Northern Italy and there might be a cargo TGV in France some time in the future. Possible as well for the connection between the new DHL hub in LEJ and FRA, but in the US?



.



E's passed on! That parrot is no more! He has ceased to be! E's expired and gone to meet 'is maker!
User currently offlineJetjack74 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 7410 posts, RR: 50
Reply 8, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 4836 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Tjwgrr (Reply 1):
With YIP's longest runway at just over 7500', I'm sure a runway extension at YIP would be needed for a heavily loaded 742F to make it to ANC or beyond.

I brought this up a few times recently. NWA Cargo is planning to expand it's scheduled cargo network to AMS, FRA, and one other city in Europe to fly cargo to and from India. The plan is to eventually get rid of the Berry IT, and replace it with a Cargo handling facility at metro.



Made from jets!
User currently offlineIndy From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 4567 posts, RR: 18
Reply 9, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 4745 times:

Heck NW should just open a larger cargo center here at IND. We have the runways in place and the huge facility that the US Postal Service used to use as their express mail hub. There is nearby rail access as well as easy access to I-70, I-69, I-74 and I-65.


Indy = Indianapolis and not Independence Air
User currently offlineAvianca From Venezuela, joined Jan 2005, 5925 posts, RR: 40
Reply 10, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 4729 times:

Quoting PanHAM (Reply 7):
Cargo goes on both passenger and cargo aircraft, for the sake of connectivity, such a facility can only be at DTW

NW should currently not have much cargo that is transfered from Cargo only flights to mainline flights in DTW.

Quoting Jetjack74 (Reply 8):
NWA Cargo is planning to expand it's scheduled cargo network to AMS, FRA, and one other city in Europe to fly cargo to and from India.

interesting information, any news when flights would be started? currently NW has not a strong cargo presence in Europe, what till today I do not understand why NW Cargo has in some European stations still own offices, for example FRA, in FRA they have a own station just selling the FRA flight as the AMS flights are sold by AF/KL Cargo, wouldnt it make sense that also AF/KL sells the FRA flight?

regards



Colombia es el Mundo Y el Mundo es Colombia
User currently offlineJetjack74 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 7410 posts, RR: 50
Reply 11, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 4703 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Avianca (Reply 10):
interesting information, any news when flights would be started?

It wouldn't be possible until NWA Cargo acquires more 747F's. They're going to retire 2 freighters next year with maybe a possible 3rd late in the 4th quarter. So it might be a little while, until some more equipment becomes available, which would coincide with the building of a facility at DTW.

Quoting Avianca (Reply 10):
currently NW has not a strong cargo presence in Europe, what till today I do not understand why NW Cargo has in some European stations still own offices, for example FRA, in FRA they have a own station just selling the FRA flight as the AMS flights are sold by AF/KL Cargo, wouldnt it make sense that also AF/KL sells the FRA flight?

Well, for many years, NWA Cargo flew contracts for Seaboard World, Flying Tigers in the 1970's and 80's for a long time in and out of FRA. And with the alliance with KLM, it would only make sense to use the AMS hub and exploit the open skies agreement with India. With only operating a single daily passenger service to and from India, you're only using half the market potential.

Quoting Indy (Reply 9):
Heck NW should just open a larger cargo center here at IND.

They would be invading FX turf which would ignite a fued over the non-compete agreement with them over the Memphis operation. FX carries alot of cargo in and out of MEM for us.



Made from jets!
User currently offlineIndy From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 4567 posts, RR: 18
Reply 12, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 4674 times:

Quoting Jetjack74 (Reply 11):
They would be invading FX turf which would ignite a fued over the non-compete agreement with them over the Memphis operation. FX carries alot of cargo in and out of MEM for us.

Ah ok. I was not aware of that agreement. But makes perfect sense.



Indy = Indianapolis and not Independence Air
User currently offlineDetroitflyer From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 391 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 4645 times:

Quoting Isitsafenow (Reply 2):
How about Selfridge in Macomb county?

thats not possible, i believe selfridge is a millitary base.
DTW would be amazing



Boiler Up!!!
User currently offlinePanHAM From Germany, joined May 2005, 9386 posts, RR: 29
Reply 14, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 4622 times:

Quoting Avianca (Reply 10):

NW should currently not have much cargo that is transfered from Cargo only flights to mainline flights in DTW

They carry cargo on the passenger flights to/from Asia and Europe as well, it would not make sense to split up such operaitons. Whatever the percentage is between cargo and passenger flights, it goes into the same warehouse. A YIP operation would be a duplicaiton of costs.

Quoting Avianca (Reply 10):
W Cargo has in some European stations still own offices, for example FRA, in FRA they have a own station just selling the FRA flight as the AMS flights are sold

they have a good sales team here, integrating them into AF/KL would possibly be a problem, firing them expensive, with a 6 digit compensation for long time employees. As long as they are in the black, why change?



E's passed on! That parrot is no more! He has ceased to be! E's expired and gone to meet 'is maker!
User currently offlineM404 From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 2226 posts, RR: 5
Reply 15, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 4612 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

JetJack

So with 3 of 12 freighters gone by that estimate what plans have you heard about new freighters? Obviously NW doesn't envision a new cargo center with nine planes. I just hope they don't ask for a state loan to build it with someone elses money. Getting the same bank that backed the new DTW terminal might be interesting.



Less sarcasm and more thought equal better understanding
User currently offlineTjwgrr From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 2444 posts, RR: 2
Reply 16, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 4590 times:

Headline in not so distant future: (?)

NW to acquire 10 748i and convert 10 existing 744 to freighters.

.... perhaps wishful thinking.



Direct KNOBS, maintain 2700' until established on the localizer, cleared ILS runway 26 left approach.
User currently offlineAvianca From Venezuela, joined Jan 2005, 5925 posts, RR: 40
Reply 17, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 4522 times:

Quoting PanHAM (Reply 14):
They carry cargo on the passenger flights to/from Asia and Europe as well, it would not make sense to split up such operaitons. Whatever the percentage is between cargo and passenger flights, it goes into the same warehouse. A YIP operation would be a duplicaiton of costs.

what is there a lot of cargo that connects from the current freighter schedule to the passengers flights, I doubt it as the freighter flights are already re-loaded in Alaska for example, and the little cargo that arrives from ASIA and should connect to an european flight could use only pax flights.

Quoting PanHAM (Reply 14):
they have a good sales team here, integrating them into AF/KL would possibly be a problem, firing them expensive, with a 6 digit compensation for long time employees. As long as they are in the black, why change?

well no doubt the guys are good, but on the other hand it is not difficult to sell the space for 1 flight, were already lot of forwarders will use them even without any proactive selling. using different warehouses, different offices, etc etc should be cost on middle-term lot of more than integrate the guys the the AF/KL team.



Colombia es el Mundo Y el Mundo es Colombia
User currently offlinePanHAM From Germany, joined May 2005, 9386 posts, RR: 29
Reply 18, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 4495 times:

Quoting Avianca (Reply 17):

what is there a lot of cargo that connects from the current freighter schedule to the passengers flights, I doubt it as the freighter flights are already re-loaded in Alaska for example, and the little cargo that arrives from ASIA and should connect to an european flight could use only pax flights.

you are missing my point. The trans shipment hub for the freighters is in ANC, alright. What I said is that NW carries freight on the 747Fs as well as on their passenger flights. It makes good sense to feed into one cargo termical, which should logically be at DTW and not at YIP.



E's passed on! That parrot is no more! He has ceased to be! E's expired and gone to meet 'is maker!
User currently offlineAvianca From Venezuela, joined Jan 2005, 5925 posts, RR: 40
Reply 19, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 4478 times:

Quoting PanHAM (Reply 18):
you are missing my point. The trans shipment hub for the freighters is in ANC, alright. What I said is that NW carries freight on the 747Fs as well as on their passenger flights. It makes good sense to feed into one cargo termical, which should logically be at DTW and not at YIP.

yes it would make sense to use for both operations 1 cargo terminal, but it is not such essential, it would also work with 2 different airports without any problem. Airlines like AF or LH would have much more problems splitting the Cargo Hubs like we already often heared (FRA - LEJ) in case of LH



Colombia es el Mundo Y el Mundo es Colombia
User currently offlinePanHAM From Germany, joined May 2005, 9386 posts, RR: 29
Reply 20, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 4448 times:

Quoting Avianca (Reply 19):
yes it would make sense to use for both operations 1 cargo terminal, but it is not such essential, it would also work with 2 different airports without any problem. Airlines like AF or LH would have much more problems splitting the Cargo Hubs like we already often heared (FRA - LEJ) in case of L

sorry, but LH has a far greater international operation than NW has at DTW. LEJ is a DHL operation and right now DHL trucks its international transfer that go on scheduled flights from BRU to FRA, that will shift to LEJ/FRA. NW works for DHL as well with a ILN-ANC/ Far east 747F.

LH has split cargo ops already a long time ago between FRA and CGN.



E's passed on! That parrot is no more! He has ceased to be! E's expired and gone to meet 'is maker!
User currently offlineCOSPN From Northern Mariana Islands, joined Oct 2001, 1619 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 4397 times:

The Former USPS Express Mail Ramp and warehouse are Vacant at IND, with Interstate and Rail ready to go, wht re-invent the wheel ???

User currently offlineD L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 11357 posts, RR: 52
Reply 22, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 4347 times:

Quoting PanHAM (Reply 7):
YIP does not stand a chance, not only because of runway lenght.

The ironic thing was that the powers that be in the area built DTW with the belief that Willow Run (YIP) would be used for cargo, and DTW would be used for passengers.

Quoting Jetjack74 (Reply 11):
They would be invading FX turf which would ignite a fued over the non-compete agreement with them over the Memphis operation. FX carries alot of cargo in and out of MEM for us.

Sounds like an antitrust violation...



Send me a PM at http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/sendmessage.main?from_username=NULL
User currently offlineRampRat74 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 1537 posts, RR: 2
Reply 23, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 4318 times:

Quoting Detroitflyer (Reply 13):
thats not possible, i believe selfridge is a millitary base.

DHL has their west coast hub at March ARB. So it's possible.


User currently offlineIndy From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 4567 posts, RR: 18
Reply 24, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 4297 times:

Quoting D L X (Reply 22):
Sounds like an antitrust violation...

Why would that be an antitrust violation?



Indy = Indianapolis and not Independence Air
25 D L X : Without knowing more about the specific arrangement, I can tell you that any unreasonable agreement to restrict trade is a violation of the Sherman A
26 Indy : Its likely not an issue since the two companies are different types of companies. One is a cargo carrier and the other is a passenger carrier with a r
27 Jetjack74 : Well, there's talk that NWA maybe negotiating a deal with another cargo carrier(such as Polar or Atlas) to wet lease a few aircraft and their crews t
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Northwest DC9-10's At DTW posted Wed Nov 22 2000 18:51:04 by Midway DC9-10
Northwest B757 Stuck In Mud At DTW posted Thu Feb 17 2005 19:19:33 by KarlB737
Large Russian Cargo A/C At DTW... posted Wed Nov 26 2003 23:04:20 by ElectraBob
Northwest Employee Parking At DTW posted Thu Jun 5 2003 03:13:17 by DTWNWA
Northwest Plane W/144 Pax Slides Of Runway At DTW posted Sat Mar 17 2001 14:22:19 by HlywdCatft
Random Northwest, United, Delta At DTW Questions posted Mon Oct 16 2000 18:11:16 by DeltaShuttle
Mesaba & Pinnacle At DTW posted Fri Oct 27 2006 04:06:09 by RedTailDTW
Very Short Connection At DTW. posted Thu Oct 26 2006 22:15:30 by Eugdog
NW Hub's At DTW & MSP posted Wed Oct 25 2006 02:32:43 by RedTailDTW
ANA Cargo 767F At ORD Monday 10/2/06 posted Mon Oct 2 2006 01:53:48 by Airfinair