Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
LTU To Get A340-300s?  
User currently offlineAlitaliaMD11 From Spain, joined Dec 2003, 4068 posts, RR: 13
Posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 3696 times:

I was just reading in Airliner World and it mentioned that LTU is in talks to take delivery of three A340-300s this summer. Any word on this?


No Vueling No Party
20 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCanadianNorth From Canada, joined Aug 2002, 3390 posts, RR: 9
Reply 1, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks ago) and read 3682 times:

Just a wild guess, but isn't Air Canada set up to start taking delivery of 777s next summer?


CanadianNorth



What could possibly go wrong?
User currently offlineLTU932 From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 13864 posts, RR: 50
Reply 2, posted (7 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 3633 times:

Quoting AlitaliaMD11 (Thread starter):
I was just reading in Airliner World and it mentioned that LTU is in talks to take delivery of three A340-300s this summer.

There have been rumours about LT acquiring A343s and while they would fit well for routes such as DUS-LAX, I doubt they get them anytime soon.

Quoting CanadianNorth (Reply 1):
Just a wild guess, but isn't Air Canada set up to start taking delivery of 777s next summer?

Yes, I believe so, however, the most likely candidate for AC's A343s is LX, which needs them to consolidate their network.


User currently offlineJustPlanes From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 886 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (7 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 3537 times:

Heard they might be coming from Virgin Atlantic...

User currently offlineColumba From Germany, joined Dec 2004, 7078 posts, RR: 4
Reply 4, posted (7 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 3511 times:

This is rumored for a long time and I hope this will turn out true very soon.
This might be indeed Virgin Atlantic aircraft.



It will forever be a McDonnell Douglas MD 80 , Boeing MD 80 sounds so wrong
User currently offlineThorben From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (7 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 3494 times:

This would really rock. Especially if they come from AC, I would take a 1/144 AC A340 kit and the LTU A330 decals, and build myself a model of it.

User currently offlineBeaucaire From Syria, joined Sep 2003, 5252 posts, RR: 25
Reply 6, posted (7 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 3454 times:

A fully loaded A340-300 to LAX might have a problem with the DUS runway...
The runway is 3000 meters and maybe a little to short in hot weather.



Please respect animals - don't eat them...
User currently offlineJorge1812 From Germany, joined Apr 2004, 3149 posts, RR: 8
Reply 7, posted (7 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 3244 times:

Quoting Beaucaire (Reply 6):
The runway is 3000 meters and maybe a little to short in hot weather.

So departure has to be very early. AB does it in DRS, most flights departs with special permission in the night when the airport is closed.

Georg


User currently offlineWINGS From Portugal, joined May 2005, 2831 posts, RR: 68
Reply 8, posted (7 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 3197 times:

Just one observation. Isn't it interesting that even though the A343 series is constantly being regarded as inferior to it's closest rival the B777-200. The fact of the matter is that the A340 has no problem in finding a home.

Even the A340-200 series is taken up rather fast.

Regards,
Wings



Aviation Is A Passion.
User currently offlineThorben From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (7 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 3087 times:

Quoting WINGS (Reply 8):
Isn't it interesting that even though the A343 series is constantly being regarded as inferior to it's closest rival the B777-200.

Wishful thinking to a certain degree. But the 772 is certainly a better twinjet than the A340.


User currently offlineJfk777 From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 8428 posts, RR: 7
Reply 10, posted (7 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 3066 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

With Austrian, Air Canada and Virgin removing their A340-300's, it has been interesting to see who the first used operators of the A343 are going to be. Cathay may have a few to spare when the 773ER start arriving in Hong Kong.

User currently offlinePlaneHunter From Germany, joined Mar 2006, 6824 posts, RR: 77
Reply 11, posted (7 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 3061 times:

Quoting WINGS (Reply 8):
Isn't it interesting that even though the A343 series is constantly being regarded as inferior to it's closest rival the B777-200. The fact of the matter is that the A340 has no problem in finding a home.

Though being inferior to its rival, the A343 is still an efficient aircraft, no doubt.

Quoting WINGS (Reply 8):
Even the A340-200 series is taken up rather fast.

Yes indeed, the only permanently stored frame is a -213X version VIP aircraft...

Quoting Thorben (Reply 9):
Wishful thinking to a certain degree.

No. The B772ER carries more payload and burns less fuel than the A343. The market has clearly answered the question about the B772ER's superiority.

Quoting Thorben (Reply 9):
But the 772 is certainly a better twinjet than the A340.

Not just a "better twinjet"...


PH



Nothing's worse than flying the same reg twice!
User currently offlineMagyarorszag From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (7 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 3037 times:

Quoting Jfk777 (Reply 10):
who the first used operators of the A343 are going to be

JM with one ex. MK aircraft since 1999.
CX with three ex. SQ aircraft since 2001/2002
EK with seven ex. SQ aircraft since 2004
GF with four ex. SQ aircraft since 2003/2004 - one being delivered new directly from Airbus.
Khaliffa Airways with three ex. SQ aircraft between 2001 and 2003
LH with two ex. SN aircraft since 2003
BW with one ex. AC since 2002 and one ex. VS since 2004.
AY with one ex. VS since 2006.

Cheers, M.

[Edited 2006-11-07 14:47:10]

User currently offlineLTU932 From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 13864 posts, RR: 50
Reply 13, posted (7 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 3002 times:

Quoting Magyarorszag (Reply 12):
LH with two ex. SN aircraft since 2003

Didn't those SN A343s which flew for LH now go to SW to replace the leased MD-11s?


User currently offlinePlaneHunter From Germany, joined Mar 2006, 6824 posts, RR: 77
Reply 14, posted (7 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2993 times:

Quoting Magyarorszag (Reply 12):
JM with one ex. MK aircraft since 1999.
CX with three ex. SQ aircraft since 2001/2002
EK with seven ex. SQ aircraft since 2004
GF with four ex. SQ aircraft since 2003/2004 - one being delivered new directly from Airbus.
Khaliffa Airways with three ex. SQ aircraft between 2001 and 2003
LH with two ex. SN aircraft since 2003

And...

BW with an ex-AC bird (2002) & an ex-VS bird (2004)
TN with an ex-Canada 3000 bird (2002)
UL with two ex-Air Lib aircraft (2003)
EY with an ex-SQ/Khalifa aircraft (2004)
NM with an ex-AF plane (2005)
SW with two ex-LH/SN frame (2005)
VK with two ex-VS aircraft (2005)
AY with an ex-VS frame (2006)


PH



Nothing's worse than flying the same reg twice!
User currently offlinePlaneHunter From Germany, joined Mar 2006, 6824 posts, RR: 77
Reply 15, posted (7 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2980 times:

Quoting LTU932 (Reply 13):
Didn't those SN A343s which flew for LH now go to SW to replace the leased MD-11s?

 checkmark 

V5-NME (ex-D-AIMG) delivered 12/05, V5-NMF (ex-D-AIMF) delivered 09/06.


PH



Nothing's worse than flying the same reg twice!
User currently offlineMagyarorszag From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (7 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2980 times:

Quoting LTU932 (Reply 13):
Didn't those SN A343s which flew for LH now go to SW to replace the leased MD-11s?

That's it! I'm a bit late on updating my A340 operators list, that's why I still say they are with LH. Thanks for pointing it out. My main purpose was to let Jfk777 know who the first used A343 operators were.

Cheers.


User currently offlineTriStar500 From Germany, joined Nov 1999, 4695 posts, RR: 42
Reply 17, posted (7 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2960 times:

The A343, if coming, are likely going to be based at MUC due to infrastructural restrictions (RWY length) at DUS.


Homer: Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!
User currently offlineJJJ From Spain, joined May 2006, 1861 posts, RR: 1
Reply 18, posted (7 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2960 times:

Quoting Thorben (Reply 9):
Wishful thinking to a certain degree. But the 772 is certainly a better twinjet than the A340.

Just like the A340 is a better quadjet than the 772.

Sorry, couldn't resist  Silly


User currently offlineWINGS From Portugal, joined May 2005, 2831 posts, RR: 68
Reply 19, posted (7 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2937 times:

Quoting PlaneHunter (Reply 11):

Though being inferior to its rival, the A343 is still an efficient aircraft, no doubt.

Despite the A343 being a thirstier plane vs the B772, it is still without a doubt a very capable plane.

Quoting PlaneHunter (Reply 11):

Yes indeed, the only permanently stored frame is a -213X version VIP aircraft...

Would you happen to know what is the current status? Is it expected to be sold? Converted into passenger configuration?

Quoting PlaneHunter (Reply 11):

No. The B772ER carries more payload and burns less fuel than the A343. The market has clearly answered the question about the B772ER's superiority.

Does the A343X have any advantage vs the 772 (non ER)?

Regards,
Wings



Aviation Is A Passion.
User currently offlinePlaneHunter From Germany, joined Mar 2006, 6824 posts, RR: 77
Reply 20, posted (7 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2908 times:

Quoting WINGS (Reply 19):
Would you happen to know what is the current status? Is it expected to be sold? Converted into passenger configuration?

V8-AC3 was once ordered by the Sultan of Brunei and has been stored at HAM for several years.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © JSFoto



Quoting WINGS (Reply 19):
Does the A343X have any advantage vs the 772 (non ER)?

Yes, much more range.


PH



Nothing's worse than flying the same reg twice!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Swiss To Get A340 From Air Canada posted Sun Sep 17 2006 16:15:29 by Swissairtaz
SAS To Get A340 From Canada? posted Sun Aug 13 2006 00:36:02 by OyKIE
Royal Brunei To Get A340's Or 777's In 2006 posted Tue Dec 27 2005 22:54:01 by B742
Air Namibia To Get A340's And Additional MD11 posted Sat Jun 4 2005 16:42:56 by B742
Bmi To Get A340! posted Mon Jun 28 2004 18:35:56 by UK_Dispatcher
What Will Happen To Vigin's A340-300s? posted Sun Nov 24 2002 21:21:33 by CX747
Ansett To Get 4 A340 From SQ posted Sat Mar 24 2001 05:48:38 by QFTJT
Ansett To Get SQ A340-300s? posted Tue Feb 20 2001 19:25:22 by Brissie_lions
Southwest 737-300s To Get Winglets posted Wed Jul 19 2006 14:56:57 by Drerx7
Turkish A340-300s Fly To Europe. Is It Logical? posted Tue Jan 25 2005 10:07:12 by Emrecan