Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Takeoff Performance  
User currently offlineCba From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 4531 posts, RR: 3
Posted (14 years 2 months 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 1407 times:

Which commercial airliner has the best takeoff performance. Out of all the planes I've flown on, I'd probably say the 737 or 757.

15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTim From Australia, joined Jun 2000, 705 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (14 years 2 months 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 1359 times:

Try flying on a Garuda DC-10 on a 3 hour flight from PER-DPS.

You had better have your seat belt on!!!!


User currently offlineCritter_592 From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 279 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (14 years 2 months 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 1356 times:

From what i have heard, the 757 when delaing with a difficult DP or such.

User currently offlineBbinchi From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (14 years 2 months 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 1352 times:

I cannot provide any specifications that would suggest one aircraft having better takeoff performance than another (all things being relatively equal). What I can offer is my impressions of the most thrilling takeoffs I have experienced.

Hands down, the most amazing acceleration I have experienced was on a CO 737-300 from CLE to MDW about four years ago. The captain said something about that aircraft being equipped with some type of additional takeoff boost (I know that sounds ridiculously simplified but I cannot recall the details) although maybe what he meant was he was simply doing a full-power takeoff rather than a reduced-power one. At any rate, we were not very full at all and, I swear, it seems we shot off the ground in about 10-12 seconds.

Other than that experience, the most thrilling takeoffs I have experienced have always been in 757s and, believe it or not, one time on an AA 767-300ER flying from BRU to ORD. That was amazing considering the pax load and fuel that must have been required for that journey. I was truly impressed.


User currently offlineA student From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (14 years 2 months 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 1330 times:

From what I've seen in Heathrow:

1.) private business jets
2.) B757 and B747SP
3.) light MD11 (Swissair) or B767 (KLM), and B737


The worst performances:

1.) Turboprops
2.) Bae146
3.) A340
4.) A319 - they tended to use up more runway than some fully loaded 744s!


User currently offlineHaanZ From New Zealand, joined May 2000, 171 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (14 years 2 months 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 1321 times:

Hi

I am quite impressed by SAS' DC-9's... lining up for take-off, cranking the engines up while still keeping the brakes on.... and swoosh - off you go.

At least, that's what it feels like.

I look forward to my D92 flight on 30 Oct.... SK860 CPH-BGO.

And I agree with A student - the BAe 146 (or Jumbolino as it is nicknamed in Europe) seems to roll for ages before it rotates.

Man, that powerful DC-9.....

Hans


User currently offlineIndianGuy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (14 years 2 months 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 1317 times:

On aircraft that I have been on, the best takeoffs have been on the old 737-200's of Alliance Air. I dont think even the 737NG's give such an impressive performance.

User currently offlineSkystar From Australia, joined Jan 2000, 1363 posts, RR: 2
Reply 7, posted (14 years 2 months 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 1304 times:

In regards to the SK DC-9s, the 9-21 is the best (as you will be flying, lucky thing  

Overpowered engines, large wing, small fuselage. Little wonder it's known as the "DC-9 Sport". But not the best economic wonder.

In regards to the best perceived takeoff performance, the A320 downunder has the best feel, atmosphere to it. Nose rises a bit, wonderful whoosh spool up and then the CFM56 buzz, the whole experience. Simply wonderful. The 737 2nd Gen in comparison is quite boring. With the Boeings, you don't quite get that feel, IMHO to takeoff (ok, I confess I haven't been on an A340...yet!)

Best takeoff performance, probably an AN763 doing a MEL-SYD run. Max derate is 60°C, but its still loaded with power. Never seen any plane at Melbourne Airport takeoff in such a short distance.

Cheers,

Justin


User currently offlineSushka From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 4784 posts, RR: 15
Reply 8, posted (14 years 2 months 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 1302 times:

Iwould say the 757 or Dc-9 I spent about 2 hours watching planes take off in Moscow, and I was amazed at how little space a BA 757 took. And when I was on a Finnair Dc-9 we took off, and after a few minutes we reached our cruzing altitude.  



Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © AirNikon




Pershoyu Spravoyu Litaki!
User currently offlineHepkat From Austria, joined Aug 2000, 2341 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (14 years 2 months 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 1279 times:

I have to say, the 777 has the best takeoff performance I've ever experienced. It's such a powerful aircraft, that it just felt like slicing through air. Very smooth, effortless.

User currently offlineBa4521 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (14 years 2 months 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 1261 times:

Hi...
I agree with Hepkat, the most impressive performance is the B777. Last June I flew LGW to MBJ with BA, the take off for the 25 minute trip across Jamaica from Kingston to Montego Bay was unbelieveable. Two thirds of the passengers (and their luggage had disembarked) at Kingston, and although the plane was refuelled, I know from the return journey that it is refuelled again at Montego Bay... so it presumably had a relatively light fuel load.
The angle of climb seemed to be steeper than usual, and the plane banked sharply shortly after takeoff to cross the airport and Kingston. Even my non-aviation interested wife was impressed.
By the way, the landing at Kingston was an absolute greaser, my only landing where the passengers have applauded. (Brits don't applaud except in exceptional circumstances!!!)
Martin

Hepkat wrote:
-------------------------------
I have to say, the 777 has the best takeoff performance I've ever experienced. It's such a powerful aircraft, that it just felt like slicing through air. Very smooth, effortless.


User currently offlineFanofjets From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 2005 posts, RR: 3
Reply 11, posted (14 years 2 months 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 1243 times:

I remember being very impressed with the short take-off run while flying a DC-9-10 series aircraft with a light load. Take-off run lasted all of ten or so seconds, or so it seemed. That considered, the take-off run aboard the -21s mentioned earlier must have been amazing. Readers lucky enough to be living in the San Diego, California, area can still experience a ride on one of these rocket sleds aboard Allegiant Air's DC-9 shorty (a former SAS machine).

I have seen a Lear Jet make an amazing near vertical take-off at an airshow, but a bizjet isn't a true airliner.



The aeroplane has unveiled for us the true face of the earth. -Antoine de Saint-Exupery
User currently offlineAvion From Bouvet Island, joined May 1999, 2205 posts, RR: 7
Reply 12, posted (14 years 2 months 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 1240 times:

The Swissair MD-11 flight to Munich. You feel like being on a rocket.

Avion


User currently offlineDesertJets From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 7811 posts, RR: 16
Reply 13, posted (14 years 2 months 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 1240 times:

From my experience 737NGs, A32Xs, and 757s are by far the best runway performers with any sort of load. All have powerful wings and overpowered engines.

In March while waiting for my departure to Houston at National airport I was watching the morning departure from RWY 01. A very lightly loaded (this was a saturday) USAirways Shuttle A320 to LGA was out of there like a bat out of hell (remember DCA's main runway is only 6850' long) and a CRJ that went behind it took its sweet time. CRJs are quite the runway hog.

Hands down it still has to go to the 757. Incredibly powerful wing with hot-rodded engines. Can't beat it.



Stop drop and roll will not save you in hell. --- seen on a church marque in rural Virginia
User currently offlineFaisZ From Singapore, joined Sep 2000, 106 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (14 years 2 months 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 1224 times:

I heard that the 767 series was also a good runway performer used for high altitude takeoffs, some higher than FL100...

User currently offlineRoadrunner165 From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 878 posts, RR: 9
Reply 15, posted (14 years 2 months 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 1211 times:

It would have been on an 737-200 SWEET power that plane has!!!!!!!!!!

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Turboprop & RJ Takeoff Performance? - Aggravation posted Mon Apr 4 2005 18:41:40 by Boeing Nut
Takeoff Performance A380 Vs 747-400 posted Sat Jan 22 2005 18:56:39 by BlackKnight
4 Engine Vs 2 Engine Takeoff Performance posted Thu Aug 26 2004 20:06:02 by SATL382G
757 Takeoff Performance posted Tue Feb 24 2004 19:23:43 by MasseyBrown
777 Takeoff Performance posted Tue Oct 1 2002 13:44:46 by SQ777
A330 Takeoff Performance posted Thu Jun 13 2002 19:50:50 by 762er
A320 Takeoff Performance :) posted Tue Apr 9 2002 01:22:14 by VgnAtl747
Comments On A340 Takeoff Performance - Misleading? posted Sat Jan 19 2002 01:40:11 by Hkg_clk
A330/A340 Takeoff Performance posted Thu Oct 11 2001 09:25:51 by TEDSKI
Takeoff Performance posted Fri Oct 20 2000 05:12:31 by Cba