Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Evergreen 747 Water Bomber In HKG.... Why?  
User currently offlineN754PR From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (8 years 1 week 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 7777 times:

I'm told the aircraft was in HKG yesterday (15th) can anyone explain why? Is it on the was down to OZ for their fire season..... can it still be used as a normal freighter?

Happy for any clarification.

18 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineUPS707 From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 360 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (8 years 1 week 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 7750 times:

So that's where it went  Smile I'm pretty sure it's working as a freighter now. It ferried up to MHR this past weekend (managed to get a couple shots of it), then went over to Travis AFB for what I'm guessing was a military haul since most of the USAF civilian contracts stage at MHR before and after visiting SUU. It sure was interesting seeing that bright red tail attached to an Evergreen fuselage  Smile

User currently offlineDesertFlyer From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 515 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (8 years 1 week 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 7741 times:

So weird... we just saw it here in Arizona a couple weeks ago doing some test drops. What an amazing plane!

User currently offlineN754PR From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (8 years 1 week 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 7651 times:

I see.... well if anyone can confirm they can just switch it from freight .... to water bomber that would be interesting.

User currently offlineGatorman96 From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 874 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (8 years 1 week 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 7625 times:

Are you sure it is the tanker version? They also fly three other 747's used for cargo and passenger ops.

http://www.evergreenaviation.com/EIA/index.html

Hope this helps!



Cha brro
User currently offlineKULatICT From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 120 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (8 years 1 week 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 7613 times:

may be for heavy maintenance?

User currently offlineUPS707 From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 360 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (8 years 1 week 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 7614 times:

Quoting Gatorman96 (Reply 4):
Are you sure it is the tanker version? They also fly three other 747's used for cargo and passenger ops.

Not sure if 470 is the one that made it to HKG, but I can say for certain that's the one I saw at MHR headed for SUU and it went on to RJTY ( http://flightaware.com/live/flight/EIA2508 ), so I guess HKG is possible.


http://www.theblacksweb.com/pics/n470ev-small.jpg


User currently offlineGatorman96 From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 874 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (8 years 1 week 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 7613 times:

Quoting UPS707 (Reply 6):
so I guess HKG is possible.

That pic definitely answers my question. Evergreen's website makes the liveries of the cargo version and the tanker almost indentical. I guess it is pretty hard to mistake the cargo version for the tanker. Nice pic by the way. Thanks for the info



Cha brro
User currently offlineUPS707 From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 360 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (8 years 1 week 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 7610 times:

Quoting Gatorman96 (Reply 7):
Evergreen's website makes the liveries of the cargo version and the tanker almost indentical. I guess it is pretty hard to mistake the cargo version for the tanker. Nice pic by the way.

It's definately one for the private collection  Smile The lighting was crappy, it was cloudy and 7am, but you never know when the EIA birds are going to leave, so I snagged the pic while I could. Sure enough it was gone when I got off work. That tail is recent since all the pics here show the traditional livery. That tail is actually what made me go see what the heck was visiting! I was driving the south side of the field and noticed the red tail on what I could swear was an EIA body and had to drive around to the closer side to see what it was. Being around MHR is fun if you like the cargo birds. We get the normal DHL/ABX and UPS stuff, then the odd Evergreen, Atlas, Polar or Kalitta 747s staging for Travis. Got a couple of surprises earlier this year when Gemini brought us a couple of DC10s on their way to Travis. Now if I could just catch them on their way in or out, that would be awesome  Smile


User currently offlineFlyinTLow From Germany, joined Oct 2004, 524 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (8 years 1 week 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 7610 times:

Really interesting. Wasn't that plane down in MZJ the past weeks? I think I saw it take off Saturday if I remember correctly. Was on the ground though, so I couldn't say for sure...

Cheers,
Thilo



- When dreams take flight, follow them -
User currently offlineTrevD From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 336 posts, RR: 3
Reply 10, posted (8 years 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 7610 times:

Can't help but wonder if this has turned out to be a failure as a water bomber for Evergreen. Just came through the summer forest fire season in the US and the a/c has not been used in that role.

If the a/c is now down in HKG hauling freight again, may be that that EVR has declared defeat and returned the a/c to use as a freighter.


User currently offlineArffguy From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 158 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (8 years 1 week 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 7610 times:

I got on board N477EV (the one in back) and talked to the mechanic. N470EV has been converted back to ordinary cargo configuration for the holiday rush. The water tanks and four spray nozzles have been removed. The nozzle holes have been plugged with flat plates. The mechanic says its not that big of a deal. He also stated that N477EV is the next to be converted to be a water bomber but that it will occur sometime in 2007. He also said that he himself (working for Evergreen) is setting up to do contract work with the 747LCF project. Interesting there are no pictures on Anet yet with the red tail and the U.S. Forest Service tanker number. They are still trying to decide where to station the tankers during fire season in the U.S. The reason it wasn't used for fires is that the FAA just very recently granted the Supplemental Type Certificate for the mods.

[Edited 2006-11-16 07:52:35]


Time to spare, go by air.
User currently offlineUPS707 From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 360 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (8 years 1 week 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 7610 times:

Quoting Arffguy (Reply 11):
I got on board N477EV (the one in back) and talked to the mechanic.

Now you've got me jealous... I want to cross the fence  Smile


User currently offlineN754PR From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (8 years 1 week 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 7610 times:

confirmed, saw a pic of it loading freight via the nose. Shame I missed it.

User currently offlineWjcandee From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5289 posts, RR: 23
Reply 14, posted (8 years 1 week 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 7610 times:

If anybody wanted confirmation: Yes, the tank system is removeable; it's essentially on pallets. That way, while the Fire-O-Crats continue to screw around with how to use the aircraft, Evergreen can get some revenue from the thing. And thank Goodness Evergreen was smart enought to do that. Now that they have the STC, the issue is Tanker Board approval and contracting.

The DC10 Tanker's owners have been bitching recently that they are going to have to throw in the towel pretty soon if they don't get more than a "call when needed" contract from somebody, pointing out that they have to pay rent on the aircraft every month. Evergreen's ability to use their 747 as a freighter when not needed as a tanker obviates that concern.

Thanks for the photo with the red tail. Very cool!!!!


User currently offlineCOSPN From Northern Mariana Islands, joined Oct 2001, 1643 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (8 years 1 week 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 7610 times:

Yes, Its Just a 747F again now back hauling freight. Noseloader only (no side Maindeck door)

User currently offlineMCOflyer From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 8690 posts, RR: 16
Reply 16, posted (8 years 1 week 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 7610 times:

Evergreen won't give up. If they are converting 477 into firebomber stats it tells me somethings about to happen. ( contract, etc)

MCOflyer



Never be afraid to stand up for who you are.
User currently offlineHiJazzey From Saudi Arabia, joined Sep 2005, 872 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (8 years 1 week 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 7610 times:

Excuse my ignorance on this matter, but how suitable are these planes for fire fighting? don't you need to fly low and slow when water bombing?

User currently offlineWjcandee From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5289 posts, RR: 23
Reply 18, posted (8 years 1 week 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 7610 times:

Quoting HiJazzey (Reply 17):
Excuse my ignorance on this matter, but how suitable are these planes for fire fighting? don't you need to fly low and slow when water bombing?

A lot of good information on this is at Evergreen's web site here: http://www.evergreen-eagle.com/supertanker/index.html

Your actual question is discussed in the FAQ at that site. There are also some videos of water drops, etc. It's cool. The DC10 tanker, which uses a less-sophisticated drop system, was recently used in some California wildfires, and by all accounts did a good job, surprising even the incident commanders with how well it did. No reason to think that the Evergreen version will be anything but more effective, given that it holds twice as much retardant as the DC10.

PS Although Evergreen's web site doesn't report that they have now received their STC, they did indeed get it near the end of October.

[Edited 2006-11-16 16:32:16]

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
DC-10 Water Bomber In Use In CA Fires posted Sat Oct 28 2006 01:42:00 by Nbgskygod
2 CO 764s Just Arrived In HKG. Why? posted Tue Jul 9 2002 16:24:39 by Cx flyboy
Why So Many Evergreen 747's In PHL? posted Wed Dec 17 2003 10:03:49 by Usair330
747 Photo In HKG Dec.26 posted Wed Jan 1 2003 17:02:49 by Aamd11
QF187, SYD - HKG, Why Did It Stop In Darwin? posted Sun May 26 2002 06:14:11 by Hkgspotter1
Anyone Know Why A Northwest 747-200 Was In Phx posted Fri Feb 22 2002 02:12:15 by Boeing 747-311
Ident. This Picture: Evergreen 747 In The Snow! posted Tue Apr 17 2001 00:27:35 by Mason
Sole CX 747-300 In Storage; Why? posted Fri Apr 6 2001 11:13:27 by Airmale
Korean 747 Energency Landing In Siberia posted Sun Nov 12 2006 00:07:09 by Kevin
UA Using A CO Gate In LAX, Why? posted Wed Oct 11 2006 00:20:33 by ATLAaron
747 Photo In HKG Dec.26 posted Wed Jan 1 2003 17:02:49 by Aamd11