Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Sorry For The Delay.. It's A Heap Of Rubbish  
User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9628 posts, RR: 68
Posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 3631 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

HOLIDAYMAKERS waiting to take-off on a delayed flight to Edinburgh today claimed the pilot told them the plane was a "heap of rubbish".

The passengers had been sitting in the Boeing 737 on the runway at Lanzarote Airport yesterday when they claim the pilot made the announcement.


And more shocking

The pilot allegedly admitted the six-year-old plane was only designed to carry 55 tonnes, but had 61 on board.

http://news.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=1706462006

3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineFuturecaptain From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 3520 times:

why would a PIC accept a plane 6 tons overweight? Either he was full of BS or had a death wish.
I flew an overweight plane once, not 6 tons on an airliner, but still a little extra weight in a Cessna is something. It was NOT fun by any means and a complete wake up call, never doing that again.


User currently offlineIkramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21516 posts, RR: 60
Reply 2, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 3484 times:

This is the key:

"Where some confusion may have arisen is that the pilot, in trying to explain the take-off delay to passengers yesterday, used the phrase 'performance limiting' -referring to the runway length and direction of take-off which on the day was contrary to the prevailing wind.



---My guess is that the pilot was angry that the airline was not taking some pax off and lowering the load, and that was "rubbish" and explained that the runway they were allowed to take off from was too short to carry all the pax, but that passengers got a bit confused as to exactly what he was talking about.

I'm sure he was angry (and unprofessional for letting the pax know it). Fly Globespan may also have "under engined" 737s? I know that each model can be equipped with multiple thrust ratings for the CFM engines. Maybe they cut corners to buy the cheaper engines, and this pilot was angry about that?



Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlineKen777 From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 8228 posts, RR: 8
Reply 3, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 3412 times:

Bit of a relief . . . I was afraid this was going to be a basher of a thread on the 380.  Smile

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
"Airbus Sorry For 380 Delay" Article posted Thu Aug 11 2005 15:29:40 by Lumberton
Shame For The Most Pleasant Airport Of Europe posted Sun Jan 6 2002 14:08:32 by Air Orange
SFO And The New IT... Victims Of Inept Management posted Sun Mar 11 2001 00:40:13 by DeltaSFO
Would You Fly 6,936 Miles For The Heck Of It? posted Wed Apr 28 2004 02:06:44 by MSYtristar
Do You Fly Just For The Heck Of It? posted Sun Sep 21 2003 20:04:20 by Planesarecool
Anyone Ever Fly Just For The Heck Of It? posted Sun Jul 14 2002 03:33:14 by Bruce
Is It The End Of The Road For The Sabena MD11's? posted Mon Apr 30 2001 21:03:32 by LGW
If It Wasn't For The A380 Where Would Airbus Be? posted Wed Jun 28 2006 16:49:57 by Art
If It Was'nt For The A320 Where Would Airbus Be posted Tue Jun 27 2006 14:32:01 by Malb777
Real Reason For The Third A380 Delay? posted Sat Jun 17 2006 08:32:07 by Zvezda