Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Virgin Blue Long Haul Decision This Month  
User currently offlinePanAm_DC10 From Australia, joined Aug 2000, 4096 posts, RR: 90
Posted (7 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 4262 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
COMMUNITY MANAGER

Toll Holdings limited have decided to retain their majority stake in Virgin Blue and may shift some of their freight operations to DJ. The CEO of Toll has been quoted as saying they will place an order this month.

Virgin Blue ''offered further value enhancement for Toll shareholders,'' the Melbourne-based company's Chief Executive Officer Paul Little said in a statement to the Australian Stock Exchange today. Toll took the A$1.4 billion ($1.1 billion) stake after getting Patrick, Australia's biggest shipping cargo handler.

Toll may move its own freight on Virgin Blue aircraft, the company said. Little cited the potential to start flying the airline on the trans-Pacific route between the U.S. and Australia and the purchase of new jets for the fleet this month as possible areas of value growth.


Source http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...conews&tkr=TOL:AU&sid=aAvI3_puEST4

This will be an interesting decision given the availability 777 slots for their desired time frame.

Regards, PanAm_DC10

[EDIT - Spelling]

[Edited 2006-11-28 04:24:30]


Ask the impossible to achieve the best possible
21 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJacobin777 From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 14968 posts, RR: 60
Reply 1, posted (7 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 4236 times:

Hi PanAm_DC10...thanks for the link.. Smile

Doesn't their potential fleet acquistion depend on getting the daily flights which they were looking for, or is it basically "open-skies" agreement between Australia and the United States?

That being said, I hope DJ gets the 773W or 772-LR and starts service to SFO, LAX, and possibly YVR.....

If they serve SFO, maybe they will get my business instead of QF...serves QF well for not getting the 777's.... stirthepot  Angry devil 

That being said, QF did order a monster amount of 787's..so I guess I'll give them my business afterall..

Took this photo on Sunday...different approach (19L rather than the 28's) thumbsup 

http://img91.imageshack.us/img91/8651/qfsfo112606fe4.jpg



"Up the Irons!"
User currently offlinePlanetime From Singapore, joined Mar 2006, 719 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (7 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 4207 times:

Quoting Jacobin777 (Reply 1):
Doesn't their potential fleet acquistion depend on getting the daily flights which they were looking for, or is it basically "open-skies" agreement between Australia and the United States?

Hi jacobin,

Under US-OZ open skies agreement both countries carriers can fly as much as they can.. Only restriction is they have to do minimum 3X per week.

Quoting Jacobin777 (Reply 1):
That being said, I hope DJ gets the 773W or 772-LR and starts service to SFO, LAX,

Oh you never know they might be getting 343's and 346's from "4 engine 4 long haul"  Smile


User currently offlineJacobin777 From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 14968 posts, RR: 60
Reply 3, posted (7 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 4186 times:

Quoting Planetime (Reply 2):
Hi jacobin,

Under US-OZ open skies agreement both countries carriers can fly as much as they can.. Only restriction is they have to do minimum 3X per week.

Hi Planetime.. Smile

Interesting.. scratchchin ..I didn't know about that...

Quoting Planetime (Reply 2):
Oh you never know they might be getting 343's and 346's from "4 engine 4 long haul"  Smile

True, true..but Sir Richard Branson doesn't have a controlling stake in it (nor does he run the operation), so DJ wouldn't be needing to use silly marketing gimmicks... Smile


I'm still hoping to see the 777's in DJ colours.. pray 



"Up the Irons!"
User currently offlineQF744 From Australia, joined Feb 2004, 415 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (7 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 4181 times:

Virgin Blue said they are looking at 7 firm orders on 2008 production lines from both Airbus and Boeing, and "don't care" which a/c they take!
QF744

From The Australian
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au...ory/0,20867,20809678-23349,00.html

Virgin is still talking to both manufacturers about its plans. Mr Godfrey said the airline was fortunate in that it didn't care which it went with.



IT'S ALL ABOUT THE UPPER DECK
User currently offlineFlyDreamliner From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 2759 posts, RR: 15
Reply 5, posted (7 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 4160 times:

Quoting Planetime (Reply 2):
Oh you never know they might be getting 343's and 346's from "4 engine 4 long haul" Smile

I dunno, Sir Richie seems to be putting his four holers to good use, I'm not sure he can just hand them off.... At this point, the money is on Boeing jets, but I only say that due to recent market sentiments. I think it would be nice to have someone running to OZ from North America with Airbus hardware, depending who I am traveling with, the option of flying on a 2-4-2 layout aircraft can be nice (or if UA would ever fly their 777s there, 2-5-2 is just as good).



"Let the world change you, and you can change the world"
User currently offlineJacobin777 From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 14968 posts, RR: 60
Reply 6, posted (7 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 4139 times:

Quoting QF744 (Reply 4):
Virgin is still talking to both manufacturers about its plans. Mr Godfrey said the airline was fortunate in that it didn't care which it went with.

Possibly to get better prices from both manufacturers.... Wink



"Up the Irons!"
User currently offlineWillyj From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 468 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (7 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 4130 times:

Quoting FlyDreamliner (Reply 5):
I think it would be nice to have someone running to OZ from North America with Airbus hardware, depending who I am traveling with, the option of flying on a 2-4-2 layout aircraft can be nice (or if UA would ever fly their 777s there, 2-5-2 is just as good).

Try Air Tahiti Nui for the airbus - stop in PPT, but if you're going to New York, it's the same either way, and I can think of worse places to layover than tahiti...

On a full flight, I think that the person stuck in the center of the 5 in a 2-5-2 layout might disagree with you!


User currently offlineB787 From Australia, joined May 2005, 152 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (7 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 4075 times:

My understanding was that DJ hadn't made a decision on trans-pac flights because they only had access for 4 flights a week and wanted at least daily. Read this a couple of times in different publications. Could be confused though  Confused

Out of the 777 and the A340 which holds more freight? I think this would impact the decision consider Tolls objectives.

How exciting is Australia's commercial aviation market at the moment! QF with A380s and 787s, Jetstart flying internationally and Virgin Blue with Ejets on order and now this. It's great.


User currently offlineFlyjetstar From Australia, joined Feb 2006, 951 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (7 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 4046 times:

Quoting PanAm_DC10 (Thread starter):
the purchase of new jets for the fleet this month as possible areas of value growth.

Isn't he talking about the Embraer's orders earlier in November?

From The Australian:
Mr Little cited Virgin’s recent decision to order 14 Embraer regional jets as showing Virgin’s ability to innovate and said its trans-Pacific long-haul service offered exciting prospects.


User currently offlineQF744 From Australia, joined Feb 2004, 415 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (7 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 4028 times:

So if the planes are on the 2008 delivery schedule, what will they do in the mean-time to be able to service the AUS-USA route, should they launch, as expected, in 2007?


IT'S ALL ABOUT THE UPPER DECK
User currently offline2wingtips From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (7 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 4002 times:

Quoting QF744 (Reply 10):
So if the planes are on the 2008 delivery schedule, what will they do in the mean-time to be able to service the AUS-USA route, should they launch, as expected, in 2007?

They have said for a while that they expect to launch in 2008. They will have to announce very soon if they are able to acquire 2008 aircraft from either Airbus/Boeing/lessor. Possibly, there has been a resolution to the daily rights to the USA.


User currently offlineQF744 From Australia, joined Feb 2004, 415 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (7 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 3980 times:

The report says they have the slots reserved, but they would still need 3 a/c in the fleet at least to service one daily AUS-USA route.
From what I understand, they are looking at 777s as a likely outcome, but given that Godfrey says he "doesn't care" which a/c they choose, I wouldn't be suprised to see DJ take on a couple of 346s or 744s from VS on a short-term basis to help start the service.
QF744



IT'S ALL ABOUT THE UPPER DECK
User currently offline777ER From New Zealand, joined Dec 2003, 11850 posts, RR: 18
Reply 13, posted (7 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 3857 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR

Quoting Planetime (Reply 2):
Under US-OZ open skies agreement both countries carriers can fly as much as they can.. Only restriction is they have to do minimum 3X per week.

I thought that new entrants on the OZ-US direct market are restricted to either 3 or 4 per week to start with

Quoting FlyDreamliner (Reply 5):
I dunno, Sir Richie seems to be putting his four holers to good use,

Richie Rich has got nothing to do with DJs order


User currently offlineCoolSkyGuy From United States of America, joined Nov 2006, 55 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (7 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 3841 times:

Quoting PanAm_DC10 (Thread starter):
Toll may move its own freight on Virgin Blue aircraft, the company said. Little cited the potential to start flying the airline on the trans-Pacific route between the U.S. and Australia and the purchase of new jets for the fleet this month as possible areas of value growth.

Are they even considering to start the Aussie-Europe flights?


User currently offlineColumba From Germany, joined Dec 2004, 7027 posts, RR: 4
Reply 15, posted (7 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 3801 times:

How about 747-8I or even A380s ?


It will forever be a McDonnell Douglas MD 80 , Boeing MD 80 sounds so wrong
User currently offlinePanAm_DC10 From Australia, joined Aug 2000, 4096 posts, RR: 90
Reply 16, posted (7 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 3769 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
COMMUNITY MANAGER

Quoting CoolSkyGuy (Reply 14):
Are they even considering to start the Aussie-Europe flights?

This is not Virgin Blue speaking but Mr Little from Toll Holdings. He has, in the past, not ruled out Freighters for Asian destinations for their Logistic operations.

I agree, I have a different report to most and to clarify, this month should read this year given there are only 2 days left and 777 demand is experiencing an upsurge. Either way we Aussies win, be great to see VH rego'd A3456 or B777 series.

Quoting 777ER (Reply 13):
Richie Rich has got nothing to do with DJs order

 thumbsup  to you sir!

Regards, PanAm_DC10



Ask the impossible to achieve the best possible
User currently offlineScouseflyer From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2006, 3364 posts, RR: 9
Reply 17, posted (7 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 3709 times:

Quoting QF744 (Reply 12):
From what I understand, they are looking at 777s as a likely outcome, but given that Godfrey says he "doesn't care" which a/c they choose, I wouldn't be suprised to see DJ take on a couple of 346s or 744s from VS on a short-term basis to help start the service.

How about some A346s (or A332s sent down the line to replace them) that were recently "cancelled" by a middle-eastern airline..........


User currently offline777ER From New Zealand, joined Dec 2003, 11850 posts, RR: 18
Reply 18, posted (7 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 3654 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR

Quoting Scouseflyer (Reply 17):
Quoting QF744 (Reply 12):
From what I understand, they are looking at 777s as a likely outcome, but given that Godfrey says he "doesn't care" which a/c they choose, I wouldn't be suprised to see DJ take on a couple of 346s or 744s from VS on a short-term basis to help start the service.

How about some A346s (or A332s sent down the line to replace them) that were recently "cancelled" by a middle-eastern airline..........

That airline was EK. I'm still expecting a B773 order due to their B737NG fleet.

I'm thinking the long haul fleet will carry ZK regos because they will need to be operated by Pacblue which is based in CHC and their B738s carry ZK regos


User currently offlineFlyjetstar From Australia, joined Feb 2006, 951 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (7 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 3268 times:

Board approval to US flights.

"VIRGIN Blue plans to launch a long-haul international airline on US routes have been given a green light by the airline¿s board as Australia¿s second biggest carrier yesterday upgraded its net profit forecast by 40 per cent to more than $158 million."

Link to the story here


User currently offlineJacobin777 From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 14968 posts, RR: 60
Reply 20, posted (7 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 3208 times:

Quoting Flyjetstar (Reply 19):
Board approval to US flights.

"VIRGIN Blue plans to launch a long-haul international airline on US routes have been given a green light by the airline¿s board as Australia¿s second biggest carrier yesterday upgraded its net profit forecast by 40 per cent to more than $158 million."

Link to the story here

Thanks for the link.. checkmark ...

Looks very intersting....they want to start two years from now....I think they will get the route authority..now lets see which planes they get.....



"Up the Irons!"
User currently offlineAntares From Australia, joined Jun 2004, 1402 posts, RR: 39
Reply 21, posted (7 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 3189 times:

A hectic morning.

The Qantas buy outers have been rejected by the board.

Virgin Blue has lifted its profit guidance by 40 %.

Its controlling owner Toll has split its operations in two, for infrastructure and services. This will make both the parent company which is a highly desirable logistics enterprise as well as the airline harder targets to raid either in total or on their own.

To follow the fun, go to breaking news services or the airline sites or pick up the announcements from the ASX.

Antares


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Virgin Atlantic Starting LHR-DXB This Month posted Wed Mar 1 2006 22:36:35 by Emirates773ER
Aer Lingus Long-haul Decision - It's... posted Thu Feb 9 2006 16:10:27 by Backfire
Virgin A340 At IAD Early This Month. posted Tue Jun 1 2004 04:58:43 by Iflyorl
Virgin Blue Looking For Long Haul Aircraft posted Mon Jul 3 2006 03:22:51 by Bill142
Virgin Blue 9 Month Profit Rises 12.8% To US$64.5M posted Wed Aug 23 2006 05:01:48 by Singapore_Air
Royal Jordanian Nears Long-Haul Fleet Decision posted Thu Jun 8 2006 08:10:28 by Leelaw
Qantas Long Haul Fleet Decision Due Dec. 7, So..? posted Wed Nov 30 2005 10:56:34 by Keesje
Tough Month For Virgin Blue posted Mon Nov 15 2004 15:40:40 by Lufthansa
New Long Haul Flights For Blue Panorama posted Fri Oct 22 2004 14:02:32 by Airblue
Virgin Vs. Qantas Domestic Long-haul? posted Tue Apr 13 2004 02:52:03 by QantasffCL