Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
BA Contacts 33,000 Passengers Because Of Radiation  
User currently offlinePizzaandplanes From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (7 years 8 months 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 2416 times:

Due to traces of radiation from a Russian spy who died of radiation last week in a hostpital, BA is contacting passengers who were on 221 different flights.A quater of the flights were to moscow on 3 different 767's. How do these planes become exposed to the radiation? What could the affects to a plane be?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6159927.stm

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAADC10 From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 2073 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (7 years 8 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 2392 times:

The material that was used to poison the spy is supposed to be polonium 210 which is extremely deadly but only if ingested. This article in Newsweek mentions the polonium 210 and that it can be handled with bare hands without harm and it could only have come from advanced nuclear weapons labs:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15940502/site/newsweek/

Unless you dropped some food on it and ate it, or it was on your pillow or blanket while you were drooling on it, it is unlikely to affect passengers. It also has a half life of only 138 days so it will turn into lead in about a year.


User currently offlineMarkHKG From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 960 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (7 years 8 months 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 2257 times:

Quoting AADC10 (Reply 1):
but only if ingested.

I would point out that inhalation of the particles would also be dangerous. The isotope emits alpha radiation, which is blocked by something as thin as paper or skin, so just sitting next to it wouldn't hurt you.

Quoting Pizzaandplanes (Thread starter):
How do these planes become exposed to the radiation?

I think the insinuation by some authorities is that the polonium was carried into, or out of, the country was via someone who had boarded these planes, and subsequently contaminated these locations. Of course, it is not known whoever contaminated these planes had anything to do directly with Litvinenko's death.

Right now I am more concerned about the "worried well" and how they may flood the healthcare system with unjustifed worries thus placing a burden on hospitals. We have seen this in the aftermath of the anthrax attacks in the US, the Tokyo subway sarin nerve agent release, among others.



Release your seat-belts and get out! Leave everything!
User currently offlineFlyDreamliner From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 2759 posts, RR: 15
Reply 3, posted (7 years 8 months 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 2190 times:

BA is covering themselves.... if anyone gets sick, it's not on them in any way for being irresponsible. They are erroring on the side of safety. I think it's smart... the Polonium 210 is orders of magnitude more lethal per gram than cyanide, one grain of sand's worth is more than enough to kill someone with plenty of room to spare.


"Let the world change you, and you can change the world"
User currently offlineA3 From Greece, joined Oct 2006, 262 posts, RR: 8
Reply 4, posted (7 years 8 months 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 2141 times:

There is not mentioned what isotope was found in the aircrafts.
In BA notice was mentioned that radioactive traces where found. There is no word about polonium 210.


The Russian spy did he travel with ALL these planes?
How come that traces of radioactive material was found in so many planes if its related to the Russian spy???

I think that BA has to be more specific about this serious matter.



Don't spend your money on airlines that don't respect your business.
User currently offlineBA787 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2006, 2596 posts, RR: 7
Reply 5, posted (7 years 8 months 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2024 times:

So what sort of legal action could be taken against BA if any passenger was ill? Would BA be liable or not?

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
If BA Are Having To Change Because Of ATC... posted Mon Jan 8 2001 15:06:47 by Englandair
Why Does BA Have Cloth Seats At Rear Of B767s? posted Sun Sep 24 2006 20:46:58 by 8herveg
RUMOR: 737RS Development Slows Because Of 787 posted Fri Sep 8 2006 23:54:47 by Zone1
Pratt & Whitney Sued Because Of Engine Failure posted Tue Aug 22 2006 21:01:09 by RoseFlyer
A HK Girl Expelled From A Jet Because Of A Hangbag posted Wed Jul 26 2006 17:39:13 by CXCPA
Seattle Mariners' Plane Evacuated Because Of Fire posted Tue Jul 18 2006 06:00:39 by Clickhappy
Debarking Because Of MX Issue posted Wed Jun 7 2006 01:44:26 by Aileron11
TG Flight Return To ARN Because Of Aggresive Pax posted Sun Jan 22 2006 01:44:37 by Flyboy_se
TXL: Police Covinces BA Pilot To Deboard Passengers posted Fri Dec 30 2005 13:34:09 by Pelican
MKE Passes 7,000,000 Passengers For 2005 posted Wed Dec 14 2005 03:59:12 by Legacytravel