Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Zeal Is Real Over 787's Virtual Rollout  
User currently offlineNYC777 From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 5796 posts, RR: 47
Posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 4007 times:

Great article about the 787 progress to date. Check out the virtual final assembly of the 787 (link in the page), that is pretty cool.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...5386_boeing07.html?syndication=rss


That which does not kill me makes me stronger.
17 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAerospaceFan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 3961 times:

(Excerpt from the article)

Quote:
The large, bulbous converted 747s that will ferry sections of the 787 Dreamliner around the globe will be painted white with a new marketing name on the side: Dreamlifter.

Good name!  Smile


User currently offlineN328KF From United States of America, joined May 2004, 6491 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 3866 times:

From the linked article (fair use):

Quote:
"We really don't have time for them not to fit," Mark Jenks, who leads the design and production of the jet's wings and tail, said in the video presentation. "When they come together the first time, they have to fit."

Sounds like a jab at EADS here.



When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.' T.Roosevelt
User currently offlineGlom From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2005, 2821 posts, RR: 10
Reply 3, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 3691 times:

Quoting N328KF (Reply 2):
Sounds like a jab at EADS here.

Just because they're stating an obvious truth, it doesn't mean it's a jab at a company who missed that same obvious truth.


User currently offlineLeelaw From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 3657 times:

Video: Boeing completes first final assembly of 787 (virtually); and everything fits

Boeing has completed its first successful full three dimensional virtual final assembly for the 787 in a test of all build processes of the new aircraft...

http://www.flightglobal.com/Articles...(virtually)%3b+and+everything.html


User currently offlineN328KF From United States of America, joined May 2004, 6491 posts, RR: 3
Reply 5, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 3642 times:

Quoting Glom (Reply 3):
Just because they're stating an obvious truth, it doesn't mean it's a jab at a company who missed that same obvious truth.

At the same event they handed out wiring harnesses as swag?  Wink



When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.' T.Roosevelt
User currently offlinePolymerPlane From United States of America, joined May 2006, 991 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 3521 times:

For me this is the most interesting piece of story:

Quote:
• The 787 development costs remain below the commitment made to the Boeing board in 2003, despite the recent increase in spending. Boeing hasn't disclosed that amount, but analysts estimate total costs at about $10 billion.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...5386_boeing07.html?syndication=rss

Looks like 787 is going to be underbudget, or at least right on.

Cheers,
PP



One day there will be 100% polymer plane
User currently offlineN328KF From United States of America, joined May 2004, 6491 posts, RR: 3
Reply 7, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 3508 times:

Quoting PolymerPlane (Reply 6):
Looks like 787 is going to be underbudget, or at least right on.

So in other words..."less than what we asked for, but more than what we hoped for."



When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.' T.Roosevelt
User currently offlineBoomBoom From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 3446 times:

Quote:
Still, even this smooth digital simulation won't translate into perfection in the real world.

Kevin Fowler, vice president in charge of processes and tools, said the virtual model will not ensure an exact fit for all parts.

Traditionally, airplane assemblers have always had to insert little pieces — called shims — to fill the spaces between parts that don't fit perfectly. On the 787, Fowler said, machinists will be supplied with kits of pre-made shims, customized for each particular section they are working on.

"There will be shims, but far fewer," Fowler said.

Less shims=less weight.


User currently offlineTeamAmerica From United States of America, joined Sep 2006, 1761 posts, RR: 23
Reply 9, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 3383 times:

Reading this article gives great insight into Boeing's advanced use of CAD tools and how well they have been integrated into the design process. This quote illustrates very clearly how far ahead Boeing is in this regard:

"Dassault Chief Executive Bernard Charles said that while Airbus used the company's CATIA computer-design tools on the A380 project, it did not use its global-collaboration software or the production-simulation software.

Such tools, he said, could have avoided some of the issues that have troubled the A380 program.

But Charles said Airbus is beginning to use the software Boeing displayed Wednesday, "starting now."


If Airbus is "starting now" they truly are a decade behind Boeing.  yes 



Failure is not an option; it's an outcome.
User currently offlineBoeingnut From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 3314 times:

Yeay for DELMIA (or QUEST as it was known back when I was playing with it). Such a great package, especially combined with CATIA like Boeing is doing

User currently offlineStirling From Italy, joined Jun 2004, 3943 posts, RR: 21
Reply 11, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 3283 times:

Nice video....could have benefited from some narration...or something!

I am still amazed at the fact they will be able to assemble a complete aircraft in just 3 days! That is just mind boggling.

Quoting N328KF (Reply 2):
"We really don't have time for them not to fit," Mark Jenks, who leads the design and production of the jet's wings and tail, said in the video presentation. "When they come together the first time, they have to fit."

I don't see that as jab at all, only a statement of fact, that is made even more incredible, by the fact that all these parts that need to fit the first time, will be coming from all four corners of the globe!



Delete this User
User currently offlineStirling From Italy, joined Jun 2004, 3943 posts, RR: 21
Reply 12, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 3277 times:

Quote:
The database, 16 terabytes in size, is held on computer servers in Bellevue and can be accessed by Boeing's major partners around the world.

How many gigabytes is that?



Delete this User
User currently offlineBrendows From Norway, joined Apr 2006, 1020 posts, RR: 4
Reply 13, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 3238 times:

Quoting Stirling (Reply 12):
Quote:
The database, 16 terabytes in size, is held on computer servers in Bellevue and can be accessed by Boeing's major partners around the world.

How many gigabytes is that?

16000 gigabytes, just "a tad" more hard drive-space than I have on my computer

Or to be correct when it comes to computer terms:
16 TB = 16384 GB

[Edited 2006-12-07 21:14:13]

User currently offlineHB88 From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2005, 817 posts, RR: 31
Reply 14, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 3220 times:

Quoting N328KF (Reply 2):
Quote:
"We really don't have time for them not to fit," Mark Jenks, who leads the design and production of the jet's wings and tail, said in the video presentation. "When they come together the first time, they have to fit."

Sounds like a jab at EADS here.

Hmm. Sounds more like an admission of some white-knuckle engineering to me.


User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 15, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 3150 times:

Quoting TeamAmerica (Reply 9):
If Airbus is "starting now" they truly are a decade behind Boeing. yes

SMARTEAM is a reasonably new addition to the Dassault PLM family, and Boeing is one of its earlier adopters.

Airbus is hardly 10 years behind. The A330/340 were designed using CATIA as well.

NS

[Edited 2006-12-07 22:08:24]

User currently offlineN328KF From United States of America, joined May 2004, 6491 posts, RR: 3
Reply 16, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 3081 times:

Quoting Gigneil (Reply 15):
Airbus is hardly 10 years behind.

I don't believe that this is the context that Airbus meant that they were "a decade behind," but they did say just that.



When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.' T.Roosevelt
User currently offlineTeamAmerica From United States of America, joined Sep 2006, 1761 posts, RR: 23
Reply 17, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 3007 times:

Quoting Gigneil (Reply 15):
Airbus is hardly 10 years behind. The A330/340 were designed using CATIA as well.

Airbus is only using CATIA, and only now getting their entire staff working on the same version. Given the A380 debacle and its roots in misuse of software, I believe Airbus has a long way to go putting their house in order (but I am confident they will do so).

IIRC, Boeing is using CATIA and DELMIA, ENOVIA, and SMARTEAM. The virtual-assembly demonstration is evidence of their active and competent use of these systems. Take note of the development time for the 7E7/787 vs. the Airbus plan for the A350. It's clear evidence of Boeing's accelerated development cycle, and that's largely driven by use of these advanced software tools.

As for the "10 years" comment; that came from Airbus (former CEO Christian Streiff).



Failure is not an option; it's an outcome.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Is The Aeroflot - 787 Deal Back On? posted Thu Nov 16 2006 19:38:33 by NYC777
Is Delta Over Doing It With All The New Service? posted Thu Feb 9 2006 21:59:10 by Nwab787techops
When The Date Is Set For 787 First posted Wed Dec 14 2005 18:12:40 by Aileron11
Airlines Where 744 Is Better Over A340/B777 posted Sat Oct 8 2005 22:53:25 by JAM747
Is IND Over Served? posted Mon Aug 1 2005 21:17:23 by Fedexexpress
The Amazing Race Is Now Over :-( posted Thu May 12 2005 06:30:40 by Timetables
Bermuda Devil Triangle Is Real? posted Fri Jan 28 2005 14:32:17 by Emrecan
Yo YYZ, YYC Is Comin Over For C-Day. posted Mon Sep 15 2003 05:59:52 by BO__einG
Which US Airline Is Real Major. posted Fri Sep 5 2003 12:49:51 by Codeshare
Man, That 777 Is A Real State-of-the-art! posted Tue Jul 31 2001 15:40:15 by El Al 001