Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
US Airways Pilots 'Gravely Concerned' About Merger  
User currently offlineOttoPylit From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 3623 times:

It appears that US/HP pilots seem to want job protection and truth on promises already made as compared to a third merger.

http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/061208/dcf040.html?.v=57


"Following a meeting with US Airways management on December 6, the leadership of the US Airways and America West pilot groups have expressed significant concerns about the proposed merger with Delta Air Lines. The leaders point out that, by failing to integrate two pilot groups under one contract, US Airways (NYSE: LCC - News) management has not yet properly merged US Airways and America West, demonstrating little chance of completing the merger of a third airline.

Equally important, the pilot groups, both of which are represented by the Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA), International, have determined that US Airways' Delta proposal raises serious issues about the job protections contained in the US Airways and America West contracts, and are questioning the company's ability to move forward with this transaction.

"Management cannot successfully merge without labor on board. We have made it clear that our pilots have zero interest in ratifying a contract that provides them with only minimal gains. US Airways, despite its statements to its investors and the financial community, has not completed the business of integrating US Airways and America West. This failure calls into question their ability to successfully merge three airlines, continue to serve their passengers, deliver dividends to their investors, and maintain a motivated employee base," said Captain John McIlvenna, America West Master Executive Council (MEC) Chairman."



OttoPylit

13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineWorldTraveler From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 3592 times:

this just further validates that even if all other concerns were dealt with, labor would sink this deal.

you cannot convince anyone except Wall Street that removing capacity is their best interests. everyone will pay a price for reduced capacity, including employees.


User currently offlineSteeler83 From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 9211 posts, RR: 20
Reply 2, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 3513 times:

Quoting WorldTraveler (Reply 1):
this just further validates that even if all other concerns were dealt with, labor would sink this deal.

Hey, we agree with this!

I was going to say that it looks as though the US pilots are very skeptical of this merger, while the DL pilots... well... that is just a given. In the thread, "US may drop DL merger deal," it is basically argued that if US cannot convince DL to merge, then the merger will not happen. Well, what if your own employees are squeemish? Man, this merger deal is looking more and more likely that it will die before the first of the year, or somewhere close to that date!

How about I go find a lightning storm some place and see if I get struck by lightning, just to see if chances of such an occurrance REALLY ARE more likely than this merger happening... If I don't come back, well you'll know why  Smile



Do not bring stranger girt into your room. The stranger girt is dangerous, it will hurt your life.
User currently offlineLuv2fly From United States of America, joined May 2003, 12110 posts, RR: 48
Reply 3, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 3496 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I really think US/HP should get there house in order before they look to buy another one.


You can cut the irony with a knife
User currently offlineSteeler83 From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 9211 posts, RR: 20
Reply 4, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 3439 times:

Quoting Luv2fly (Reply 3):
I really think US/HP should get there house in order before they look to buy another one.

I can think of a way of putting this, regarding US/HP and DL...

US still has a lot on its plate regarding the HP merger. Are they trying to see what it is like to have airline-industry indigestion? I don't think all the maalox in the world would help them with this!

As I said above, regarding the opinions of them employees for US(pilots) and DL (pretty much the entire airline), and with the argument from a prior thread, this merger is dead... What do you think?



Do not bring stranger girt into your room. The stranger girt is dangerous, it will hurt your life.
User currently offlineSupa7E7 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 3439 times:

Labor can, and does, claim dissatisfaction at all times. I do not see what a merger scenario adds or subtracts from that general posture of dissatisfaction. It is permanent, and indeed is "business as usual." Why else would unions exist? We already knew US is unionized, and by definition its workers are therefore unsatisfied, and make threats.

User currently offlineDeltaGuy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 3422 times:

Quoting Supa7E7 (Reply 5):
We already knew US is unionized, and by definition its workers are therefore unsatisfied, and make threats.

Wouldn't you be irritated too if you were working for almost 1/2 the money, and several hundred of your brothers and sisters are still on the street? US can bairley tell their head from their ass right now, let alone with another, much larger group to add. Parker is a fool for trying to undertake any of this, and if I were working for him, I'd be pretty irrate too.

DeltaGuy


User currently offlineFalcon84 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 3396 times:

Quoting Luv2fly (Reply 3):
I really think US/HP should get there house in order before they look to buy another one.

Agreed. If they haven't yet fully integrated the US/HP crews, then why throw a monkey wrench into it with this proposed deal. All it'll do, in the end, is cause friction and some hard feelings all around.

Quoting Supa7E7 (Reply 5):
Labor can, and does, claim dissatisfaction at all times.

That may be true, but in the shoes of the HP and US pilots-especially the HP ones, I'd be damned concerned, too, since the DL entity would practically swallow up the other two.

For once, I agree with the pilots on this one-they have a reason to be concerned, I think.


User currently offlineSprout5199 From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 1853 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 3394 times:

My take on this merger is that US/HP saw that DL was going to come out of ch11 just fine, and the only way they could survive was to take over DL and remove the competition.

With DL fighting back even their own pilots see the folly of this thinking.

Dan in Jupiter


User currently offlineAirframeAS From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 14150 posts, RR: 24
Reply 9, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 3370 times:

Quoting Luv2fly (Reply 3):
I really think US/HP should get there house in order before they look to buy another one

 checkmark  checkmark  checkmark  This is what I've been trying say all along...Its not in ANYBODY's best interest to merge with anybody right now. Why start another merger when you have not completed the first one?? Makes no sense!



A Safe Flight Begins With Quality Maintenance On The Ground.
User currently offlineLAXdude1023 From India, joined Sep 2006, 7618 posts, RR: 24
Reply 10, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 3292 times:

Quoting Supa7E7 (Reply 5):
I do not see what a merger scenario adds or subtracts from that general posture of dissatisfaction.

Really or is that a joke? Whenever a merger happens, employees almost always are going to be concerned about their jobs. Mergers decrease job security. Lower Job security is going to make your employees more dissatisfied. From the executives, to the pilots, to the gate agents this is the atmosphere during a merger. This could be why the piolts want some sort of protection from layoffs. I dont think anyone truly believes that this merger can be done with as few layoffs as the US staff is claiming.

Quoting Supa7E7 (Reply 5):
Why else would unions exist?

Unions exist to protect the worker. They provide protection from hostile working conditions. They make sure that the employees get paid their due as well. The downside is that sometimes they demand too much.



Stewed...Lewd...Crude...Irreverent...Belligerent
User currently offlineDeltaGuy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 3208 times:

Quoting LAXdude1023 (Reply 10):
Quoting Supa7E7 (Reply 5):
Why else would unions exist?

Unions exist to protect the worker.

Supa7e7, in his 'informed opinion', would love nothing more than to see the demise of unions, specifically ALPA, and see all of the loyal airline employees be treated like AirTran scabs.

DeltaGuy


User currently offlineSilentbob From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 2104 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 3135 times:

Quoting Supa7E7 (Reply 5):
Labor can, and does, claim dissatisfaction at all times. I do not see what a merger scenario adds or subtracts from that general posture of dissatisfaction. It is permanent, and indeed is "business as usual." Why else would unions exist? We already knew US is unionized, and by definition its workers are therefore unsatisfied, and make threats.

Most of those US employees forget the fact they were weeks (days?) away from being out of a job entirely when they "merged" with HP. They seem to feel it's far better to complain about what was lost in the process than what was saved.


User currently offlineSLCUT2777 From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 4071 posts, RR: 11
Reply 13, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 3119 times:

Quoting LAXdude1023 (Reply 10):
I dont think anyone truly believes that this merger can be done with as few layoffs as the US staff is claiming.

 checkmark   checkmark   checkmark  BINGO!
Doug Parker might have been a savior to a number of US employees, but to those at DL he looks more like Satan  devil  !

Quoting AirframeAS (Reply 9):
This is what I've been trying say all along...Its not in ANYBODY's best interest to merge with anybody right now. Why start another merger when you have not completed the first one?? Makes no sense!

 checkmark   checkmark   checkmark  !!!!!
This is the biggest no brainer. I mean come on, there have been fist fight breaking out at meetings between US and HP employees over what union locale to represent them.
ANYONE at DL right now should be concerned since all Parker will do is kick them to the curb! He doesn't give a rats-a$$ about time or tenure!



DELTA Air Lines; The Only Way To Fly from Salt Lake City; Let the Western Heritage always be with Delta!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
US Airways Flyers Hoping Against The Merger? posted Wed Dec 13 2006 22:52:27 by USAirPlatinum
US Airways Pilots To Picket posted Fri Sep 22 2006 16:10:51 by Mah584jr
WSJ: US Airways Tested Delta's Interest In Merger posted Sat Jul 29 2006 13:50:05 by Leelaw
New US Airways Paint Scheme After The Merger posted Tue Jun 21 2005 23:01:52 by ClipperAurora
US Airways Pilots Offer To Cut Pay By 12.5 Pct posted Sat Jun 26 2004 05:13:30 by InnocuousFox
US Airways Pilots Back At The Table posted Wed Jan 21 2004 07:09:36 by FA4UA
US Airways Pilots Vote No Confidence In Management posted Sat May 24 2003 02:29:47 by Artsyman
US Airways Pilots Agree To Pay Cuts posted Wed Jul 10 2002 00:27:57 by Travelin man
US Airways Pilots Accept Pay Cut posted Tue Jul 9 2002 12:44:48 by Singapore_Air
Any US Airways Pilots @ CLT Here? posted Thu May 9 2002 23:54:05 by B764