Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Boeing, Airlines Reject FAA Plan For B737 Rudders  
User currently offlinePlaneHunter From Germany, joined Mar 2006, 6816 posts, RR: 77
Posted (7 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 4509 times:

Reuters reports that Boeing and certain airlines are resisting an FAA proposal for closer monitoring of rudder performance on 737 aircraft.

http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N12371489.htm

The manufacturer and the airlines reject the Federal Aviation Administration's plan for them to update flight data recorders to capture new information by 2008.

Airlines support extra monitoring for planes fitted with advanced recorder technology on the assembly line but oppose expensive recorder retrofits for the rest of their fleet.

"Without more data, neither the FAA nor the NTSB can definitively identify the causes of suspected uncommanded rudder events," the FAA said.



PH


Nothing's worse than flying the same reg twice!
5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineIflyswa From United States of America, joined Sep 2006, 154 posts, RR: 5
Reply 1, posted (7 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 4378 times:

Apparently, deontological theory and moral idealism have no place in this industry. Aren't these executive types ever introduced to the theories of Immanuel Kant? It's a shame...

iflyswa



Opinions expressed by "iflyswa" are not those of Southwest Airlines Officers, Directors, or Employees.
User currently offlineSlz396 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (7 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 4348 times:

Quoting Iflyswa (Reply 1):
deontological theory and moral idealism have no place in this industry
Apparently not, but its not only the airlines and Boeing which are to blame, the FAA should also look to itself, because when you let planes fly which occasionally show:

Quoting PlaneHunter (Thread starter):
uncommanded rudder events
You'd need to take more action than they have been doing so far.

I realise the incident/accident rate has been low, but these uncommanded rudder events have lead to several crashes in the past already; France and the UK once grounded all Concordes because of a design weakness to its fuel tanks which led to the crash in 2000, the FAA should take example to them regardless of the number of affected planes in operation.

BTW, anybody dares to imagine the ranting on this site if an Airbus model would suffer from such a thing as uncommanded control inputs which do not have their cause determined yet????

Every so many weeks the notorious AA A300 tail brake off accident comes up again as proof of how 'bad' airbus planes are, whereas in fact the F/O gave all the inputs making the rudder swing and ultimately lead to the tail breaking off: on the 737 however we have had the problem of uncommanded rudder deflections for years, yet nobody seems to think this is totally unacceptabe....

[Edited 2006-12-13 09:47:49]

User currently offlineIflyswa From United States of America, joined Sep 2006, 154 posts, RR: 5
Reply 3, posted (7 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 4188 times:

I believe the FAA has issued at least one (if not more) ADs specifically pertaining to the 737 and uncommanded rudder events, and requiring closer inspection as well as design modifications to the affected systems. The 737 is a safe and reliable airplane, but issuing an AD to retrofit the entire existing 737 fleet with the advanced recording technology is not a solution to the problem. However, identifying and addressing a potential defect necessarily requires the data and information that these recorders could provide, which is where good corporate citizenship is called into question. If airlines and the manufacturer even considered this to be a serious defect (it is, if it indeed exists), then why not retrofit just some of the 737 fleet, particularly older types? Costs would be significantly mitigated, sufficient data could be collected about the supposed defect, and a viable and worthwhile solution might then be developed.

iflyswa



Opinions expressed by "iflyswa" are not those of Southwest Airlines Officers, Directors, or Employees.
User currently offlineRedFlyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 4335 posts, RR: 28
Reply 4, posted (7 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 3994 times:

Are uncommanded rudder movements still a potential issue or were they "fixed" by a prior AD? If the issue was resolved by a prior AD, I'm not sure I understand why there is a need to retro-fit aircraft with additional monitoring. On the other hand, if there are still incidents' of uncommanded rudder movements then the FAA and airlines would be completely out of whack to not implement the recommendation.


My other home is a Piper Cherokee 180C
User currently offlineBennett123 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2004, 7628 posts, RR: 3
Reply 5, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 3600 times:

Does this affect B737NG or just B737Classic

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Airlines Realize It's Time For A New Flight Plan posted Mon Dec 9 2002 16:05:42 by 762er
Asian Airlines Scrap Plan For War Fund posted Thu Mar 7 2002 00:30:03 by Singapore_Air
Bush Orders Government Aid Plan For U.S. Airlines posted Tue Sep 18 2001 10:46:53 by 777-500ER
Boeing Developing Plan For U.S. ATC posted Tue Jan 30 2001 06:47:28 by B757300
What Airlines Have Traded Airbus For Boeing? posted Tue Dec 5 2000 05:07:57 by L-1011-500
What Are Boeing´s Plan(e)s For The Future? posted Thu Jan 20 2000 23:53:34 by Cgn
Airlines Set To Sue For £300m Over Terror Losses posted Thu Aug 17 2006 05:04:29 by Clickhappy
Top Five Airlines With Net Profit For 2005. posted Tue Jul 18 2006 00:35:08 by BOE773
Top Eight Airlines In Operating Revenue For 2005. posted Mon Jul 17 2006 03:43:20 by BOE773
Boeing Feels "Compassion" For Airbus' Troubles posted Sun Jul 16 2006 22:31:19 by BoomBoom