Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
ORD Radar Back Up After Failing Twice Today  
User currently offlineKarlB737 From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 3143 posts, RR: 10
Posted (8 years 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 2260 times:

Courtesy: WLS-TV

Radar Back Up After Failing Twice At O'Hare - Video Report Included

http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=local&id=4854649

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Courtesy: WBBM-TV

O'Hare Radar Failure Causes Flight Delays

http://cbs2chicago.com/topstories/local_story_349083915.html

Video Report:

http://cbs2chicago.com/video/?id=28431@wbbm.dayport.com

[Edited 2006-12-15 23:40:48]

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineGlidepath73 From Germany, joined Mar 2005, 1021 posts, RR: 44
Reply 1, posted (8 years 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 2246 times:

Are they talking about the ASDE radar, or the BRITE? I mean both is bad to fail, but the ASDE is a bit less critical... -well in ORD you really need both.  Smile

Regards,
Patrick



Aviation! That rocks...
User currently offlineIahflyr From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 4790 posts, RR: 22
Reply 2, posted (8 years 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 2230 times:

The article seem to point toward the ASR-9 RADAR which is what the approach and tower would use to control aircraft. If in fact that was what went down WOW, only 1 antenna, just crazy for a spot like ORD.

If it was the ASDE RADAR, not nearly as critical for sure, but if it was foggy or bad visibility then ASDE out would sure slow things down on the ground control position.

DBRITE is taken from the ASR-9 data and fed into a tower display.



Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
User currently offlineAirfinair From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 667 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (8 years 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 2215 times:

According to the Chi Trib, it was the ASR-9 (Airport Surveillance Radar 9) radar that went down. They switched to a radar down in Tinley Park (pretty far for ORD ops, isn't it?) Arrivals were down to about 60 per hour. Only one primarty radar at ORD? Nice. BTW, PWK & UGN ops were also affected, but not MDW, as it uses the Tinley Park radar.


ORD,MDW,IND,ARB,AMS,AUS,ANQ,DTW,DEN,PHL,PIT,MIA,GPT,SAN,PHX,LAX,SFO,OAK,SEA,LAS,SLC,SMF,ATL,MEM,BOS,MHT,JFK,EWR,LGA,NASâ
User currently offlineTom in NO From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 7194 posts, RR: 33
Reply 4, posted (8 years 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 2211 times:

Johnny: "Just kidding..."



Tom at MSY



"The criminal ineptitude makes you furious"-Bruce Springsteen, after seeing firsthand the damage from Hurricane Katrina
User currently offlineIahflyr From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 4790 posts, RR: 22
Reply 5, posted (8 years 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 2147 times:

Quoting Airfinair (Reply 3):
They switched to a radar down in Tinley Park (pretty far for ORD ops, isn't it?) Arrivals were down to about 60 per hour. Only one primarty radar at ORD?

That makes more sense. When the RADAR at the primary airport such as ORD and they other ASR is not on the airport they are able to still use a terminal ASR just can't run simultanous approaches if the weather is not good enough to conduct visuals approaches, bascially if they can't see the airport or aircraft they're following by the time they're around 15 miles out on final or so then you're doing simultaneous ILS's....without the primary airport (ORD) airport RADAR operating normally then most likely they are not authorized to do the simul ILS's.

At IAH if the primary RADAR goes down we change to the site at HOU but can't do the simul ILS's so the arrival rate gets chopped from 120/hr down to 60-70 some.

Having more than one RADAR site at the primary airport is not all that common and is very expensive for sure but can certainly pay off when the only site goes into the toliet.



Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
User currently offlineFriendlySkies From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 4120 posts, RR: 5
Reply 6, posted (8 years 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 2067 times:

I feel very lucky...I was on UA455 ATL-ORD this morning, and we had no issues leaving ATL or landing at ORD. And with my luck on this route (I fly non-rev), I am still very surprised. Hopefully it didn't mess things up too bad.

User currently offlineAviatorTJ From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 1838 posts, RR: 7
Reply 7, posted (8 years 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 1988 times:

Quoting FriendlySkies (Reply 6):
I feel very lucky...I was on UA455 ATL-ORD this morning, and we had no issues leaving ATL or landing at ORD.

I was on UA444. We were holding for < 10 minutes and still got in early from MSP. Ch 9 is great for the little details.  Smile


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Back-Up Aircraft - When Airlines Own Fleet Go Tech posted Thu May 11 2006 19:14:52 by Gilesdavies
UA News, ORD-RAP Back, No Fleet Growth posted Sun Feb 5 2006 04:55:02 by Geg2rap
767 Broken Up - After Only 14 Years Service! posted Thu Jan 12 2006 15:30:36 by NA
AA ORD-FCO Back To ORD For "security Reasons" posted Mon Jun 27 2005 10:15:41 by LXsaab2000
What's Up With Florida Airports Today? posted Fri Mar 25 2005 18:23:04 by JetBlueAtJFK
Eads Ready To Back Up A350 W/ $3.3B posted Mon Nov 22 2004 03:10:26 by Kalakaua
When Does AA's JFK-FCO Start Back Up? posted Mon Oct 18 2004 03:10:54 by N771AN
MSP Tram Up After Almost Two Years In Delays posted Wed May 5 2004 22:00:10 by Pilottim747
Midway Project Winding Up After 6 Years posted Wed May 5 2004 17:27:56 by Airportplan
What's Up With NW 1884 Today? posted Sat Feb 7 2004 03:32:16 by Pwm2txlhopper