Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Luzair L-1011 TriStar At AMS  
User currently offlineMagyarorszag From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (7 years 11 months 1 week 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 3192 times:

On the "competition", I've just seen a last November picture of the Luzair TriStar stored at AMS. The author of the photo says in the remarks that CS-TMR was going through a thorough check as the airline was preparing it for Hadj operations in December. New engines from a former DL TriStar would be used.

Is this TriStar really going to flying again ? Has it already left EHAM ?

Thanks very much for any new information.

Cheers.

10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineLijnden From United States of America, joined Apr 2003, 565 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (7 years 11 months 1 week 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 3076 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Yes, yesterday she was standing at one of the hangars only missing one engine. Plane looked pretty clean and yes, I think it will fly soon! When I asked some people there, they said it would fly for PIA. Not only for hadj but also on scheduled flights. With the ban in mind I think it is a smart set to lease EU registered planes.


Be kind to animals! Last trip: ORF-IAD-NRT-IAD-ORF with UAExpress and ANA
User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12171 posts, RR: 51
Reply 2, posted (7 years 11 months 1 week 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 3068 times:

Quoting Lijnden (Reply 1):
With the ban in mind I think it is a smart set to lease EU registered planes.

So, they could not get any of the TZ L-1011s, when TZ begins flying those former NW DC-10-30s?


User currently offlineN774UA From Netherlands, joined Aug 2004, 343 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (7 years 11 months 1 week 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 3057 times:

Last couple of weeks, nobody has worked on the Tristar. #3 engine still has to be fitted, but IIRC the engine brought in, was rejected by the Dutch FAA. Also there remains a lot to be "restored" in the cockpit.

Regards
N774UA



...follow his instructions, switch off at the stand.
User currently offlineLuv2fly From United States of America, joined May 2003, 12147 posts, RR: 49
Reply 4, posted (7 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 2862 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 2):
So, they could not get any of the TZ L-1011s, when TZ begins flying those former NW DC-10-30s?

I believe one of the reasons for TZ getting rid of the L1011's was expensive heavy checks (D checks) are going to be due soon.



You can cut the irony with a knife
User currently offline474218 From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 6340 posts, RR: 9
Reply 5, posted (7 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 2778 times:

Quoting Luv2fly (Reply 4):
I believe one of the reasons for TZ getting rid of the L1011's was expensive heavy checks (D checks) are going to be due soon.

I think you will find one TZ L-1011-500 is currently in check and two others had D-Checks accomplished last year.


User currently offlineLuv2fly From United States of America, joined May 2003, 12147 posts, RR: 49
Reply 6, posted (7 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 2763 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting 474218 (Reply 5):
Quoting Luv2fly (Reply 4):
I believe one of the reasons for TZ getting rid of the L1011's was expensive heavy checks (D checks) are going to be due soon.

I think you will find one TZ L-1011-500 is currently in check and two others had D-Checks accomplished last year.

Well I did not say I was 100% right, I said I believe. Kinda like Cher.....



You can cut the irony with a knife
User currently offlineGabo787 From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2006, 158 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (7 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 2763 times:

maybe they need the plane asap and can't wait for the TZ birds.

User currently offlineCKT789 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (7 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 2752 times:

Who owns this Tristar? Do Luzair still own it?

User currently offline474218 From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 6340 posts, RR: 9
Reply 9, posted (7 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 2718 times:

Yes, L-1011-500 293B s/n 1241, is own by Luzair.

User currently offlineBennett123 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2004, 7746 posts, RR: 3
Reply 10, posted (7 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 2673 times:

If they are taking the engines from an DL L1011, then presumably has/will be broken soon.

There are too few complete Tristar's around.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Tristar At AMS... (what Airline?) posted Wed Jul 17 2002 22:52:21 by Schreiner
Air Luxor L-1011 3rd Aborted T/O At AMS Just Now posted Sat Jul 31 2004 16:21:36 by Klm-md11
Any Info Behind An Allegheny L-1011 Tristar? posted Sun Nov 19 2006 01:17:27 by Malaysia
Brussels Airlines A319 Sitting Duck At AMS/QAPS! posted Mon Nov 6 2006 16:51:20 by BrightCedars
New Wedding Services At AMS posted Thu Oct 12 2006 15:23:07 by BuyantUkhaa
Varig MD11 At AMS Today?! posted Sun Oct 8 2006 20:32:52 by Varig767
KLM 747 Incident At AMS posted Tue Aug 15 2006 10:04:01 by Vunz
KLM B737 Accident At AMS posted Sat Aug 12 2006 12:29:09 by Airbuseric
Hewa Bora Airways Tristar At BRU Today posted Sun Jul 30 2006 20:28:01 by BRUspotter
Atlas 742 Blown Tyres At AMS posted Mon Jul 17 2006 20:41:27 by Schreiner