Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
It's Here, Cell Phones In Flight  
User currently offlineTugger From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 5414 posts, RR: 8
Posted (7 years 7 months 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 3359 times:

Just saw this in the news this morning:

http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/12/21/wired.airlines/index.html
"International airline to allow cell phone chatter on planes"

"In January, Emirates airline plans to launch mobile phone usage in its planes, making it the first airline to allow passengers to make cell phone calls on its flights." The full article is at the link I provided

I don't know about you but I hate this concept. I knew it was coming but kept hoping against it. My only remaining hope will be when I ticket I will be asked: "Will that be Quiet or Annoying Chatter, sir?" (as an online mouse click option of course).

Tug

[Edited 2006-12-21 16:57:17]

[Edited 2006-12-21 16:57:59]


I don’t know that I am unafraid to be myself, but it is hard to be somebody else. -W. Shatner
22 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAirfoilsguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (7 years 7 months 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 3318 times:

Do what I have done for years to block out annoying babies, wear ear plugs. It helps immensely. Be sure to buy the Orange ones, they help indicate to talkative travelers that you wish not to be bothered. This should work well for the phoney phoners

User currently offlineUSAirPlatinum From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2006, 244 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (7 years 7 months 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 3301 times:

The price is going to be something like $5 to $10 per minute, so I doubt there will be many people talking for long periods.


"Hey guys, Delta is OUR Delta right now." -- Unpaid Creditors
User currently offlineEvan767 From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 2957 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (7 years 7 months 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 3277 times:

Didn't VS say that they were enforcing a text-only deal? NO talking, texting only? Sounds good to me.

Is EK going to have a congregating area for cell phone users? It only makes sense to do it in the back or forward galley.



The proper term is "on final" not "on finals" bud...
User currently offlineTugger From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 5414 posts, RR: 8
Reply 4, posted (7 years 7 months 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 3231 times:

Texting I could deal with. Of course the Crackberry users will be grateful for that! (You just can't stop, can you? And you know who I'm talking too!) And I can see allowing internet etc for laptops.

I also agree that earplugs are great! Even better than the noise cancelling headphones. I can't sleep easily with them on.

Tug



I don’t know that I am unafraid to be myself, but it is hard to be somebody else. -W. Shatner
User currently offlineN231YE From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (7 years 7 months 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 3214 times:

Quoting USAirPlatinum (Reply 2):
The price is going to be something like $5 to $10 per minute, so I doubt there will be many people talking for long periods.

Good. I'm glad to see some discouragement for annoying, loud, and long talkers.  checkmark 


User currently offlineDeltaGator From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 6341 posts, RR: 13
Reply 6, posted (7 years 7 months 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 3190 times:

Quoting USAirPlatinum (Reply 2):
The price is going to be something like $5 to $10 per minute, so I doubt there will be many people talking for long periods.

There will be plenty of takers. Some folks just don't know how to shut the Hell up even on a plane.

Quoting Tugger (Reply 4):
the Crackberry users will be grateful for that! (You just can't stop, can you?

I know you're not talking about me but I can put mine down anytime. I'm not addicted to it and have it mainly because getting work email outside of the office is a chore and the Blackberry makes it easier. We aren't all weaklings in need of rehab.



"If you can't delight in the misery of others then you don't deserve to be a college football fan."
User currently offlineAirScoot From United States of America, joined May 2005, 688 posts, RR: 2
Reply 7, posted (7 years 7 months 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 3183 times:

Quoting N231YE (Reply 5):
Quoting USAirPlatinum (Reply 2):
The price is going to be something like $5 to $10 per minute, so I doubt there will be many people talking for long periods.

Good. I'm glad to see some discouragement for annoying, loud, and long talkers.

Very likely not.  Sad Some people will spend the $10 per minute and call it a "legitimate business call" then charge it back to whoever signs their expense report.

How about asking for "cell phone or no cell phone" when taking seat assignments.. a 'la "smoking or non-smoking".. then put all the cell users in the back near the lavs and galleys..  Wink


User currently offlineUSAirPlatinum From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2006, 244 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (7 years 7 months 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 3172 times:

Assuming a 1/2 hour conversation at $5 per minute, you're looking at a $150 bill. People aren't going to do that any more than they were willing to yack on the old Verizon AirFones for the same price.

Remember how everyone predicted nonstop yacking when those went in, too?



"Hey guys, Delta is OUR Delta right now." -- Unpaid Creditors
User currently offlineAirScoot From United States of America, joined May 2005, 688 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (7 years 7 months 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 3156 times:

Quoting USAirPlatinum (Reply 8):
Assuming a 1/2 hour conversation at $5 per minute, you're looking at a $150 bill. People aren't going to do that any more than they were willing to yack on the old Verizon AirFones for the same price.

Remember how everyone predicted nonstop yacking when those went in, too?

I've seen far worse come through expense reports.. and those expenses got paid. For example.. satellite phone expenses in Hong Kong. Really.

The question will be in reception quality. The old AirFones sucked rock when it came to reception. I have a feeling that an inflight cell network would give something a little better.. though I would certainly pray not.


User currently offlineN231YE From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (7 years 7 months 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 3150 times:

Quoting DeltaGator (Reply 6):
There will be plenty of takers. Some folks just don't know how to shut the Hell up even on a plane.



Quoting AirScoot (Reply 7):
Very likely not. Some people will spend the $10 per minute and call it a "legitimate business call" then charge it back to whoever signs their expense report.

But didn't the USD$3.99 per-minute Verizon/GTE AirFone bring them down? If we are talking about an even higher cost ($5-10/min), then it is possible the cell phone system will hit the same fork in the road.


User currently offlineAirScoot From United States of America, joined May 2005, 688 posts, RR: 2
Reply 11, posted (7 years 7 months 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 3118 times:

Quoting N231YE (Reply 10):
But didn't the USD$3.99 per-minute Verizon/GTE AirFone bring them down? If we are talking about an even higher cost ($5-10/min), then it is possible the cell phone system will hit the same fork in the road

My understanding is the inflight phones internationally were the $10 per minute plus $15 connection charge or something in that ballpark. The $3.99-$4.99 rate was for domestic. I went to check and since the service has been discontinued, neither Verizon nor wikipedia mentions call type.

Either way.. let the air rage begin.


User currently offlineTugger From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 5414 posts, RR: 8
Reply 12, posted (7 years 7 months 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 3100 times:

Quoting DeltaGator (Reply 6):
We aren't all weaklings in need of rehab.

 Smile
Yeah but you know EXACTLY who I am talking about. It is truly amazing how some people are with those things.

Tug



I don’t know that I am unafraid to be myself, but it is hard to be somebody else. -W. Shatner
User currently offlineAirframeAS From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 14150 posts, RR: 24
Reply 13, posted (7 years 7 months 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 3102 times:

Quoting Tugger (Thread starter):
OH NO-It's HERE, Cell Phones In Flight!

I take it that some of you have NOT read the article. This does NOT apply to U.S. carriers, its international airlines. The thread title is very misleading....

Quote:
U.S. carriers don't allow in-flight cell phone calls, although the FAA is reviewing the safety concerns associated with mobile calls made in the air.

The chances of this passing with the F.A.A. is pretty slim at this time. I wouldnt get my hopes up if I were you. Im against this cell-phone usage in-flight. Just wait till the captain complains...let alone pax committing air rage!

Also, the article says....

Quote:
For one, Boeing's system was expensive -- it cost about $1 million to outfit a single plane. In contrast, airlines can equip a plane with AirCell's technology for about one-tenth of that cost, Blumenstein said.

Do you really think the U.S. air carriers will spend approx $1M to outfit EACH aircraft? This would put airlines out of business. WN couldnt afford it themselves, come to think of it. Like I said, bad idea!



A Safe Flight Begins With Quality Maintenance On The Ground.
User currently offlineAirframeAS From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 14150 posts, RR: 24
Reply 14, posted (7 years 7 months 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 3057 times:

Quoting USAirPlatinum (Reply 14):
Note that the solution being discussed is "1/10th Boeing's cost" or about $100,000. Even carriers on the brink of collapse, like Delta, could afford that.

I dont see that mentioned in the article, where does it say that?



A Safe Flight Begins With Quality Maintenance On The Ground.
User currently offlineTugger From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 5414 posts, RR: 8
Reply 15, posted (7 years 7 months 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 3048 times:

Quoting AirframeAS (Reply 13):

I take it that some of you have NOT read the article. This does NOT apply to U.S. carriers, its international airlines. The thread title is very misleading....

Ummmm, Sorry. Wasn't being mis-leading or meaning to do so. I kept it simple and included who was going to allow it in the Threadstarter specifically because I didn't want to mislead.
But the truth is that Carriers are now start to allow this.
And this isn't a "US only" board. It is very international.

Tug

[Edited 2006-12-21 18:03:42]


I don’t know that I am unafraid to be myself, but it is hard to be somebody else. -W. Shatner
User currently offlineUSAirPlatinum From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2006, 244 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (7 years 7 months 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 3025 times:

Quoting AirframeAS (Reply 15):
I dont see that mentioned in the article, where does it say that?

It's in your prior post!

Quote:
Boeing's system was expensive -- it cost about $1 million to outfit a single plane. In contrast, airlines can equip a plane with AirCell's technology for about one-tenth of that cost



"Hey guys, Delta is OUR Delta right now." -- Unpaid Creditors
User currently offlineGh123 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 17, posted (7 years 7 months 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 2988 times:

I hate the idea.

I mean if you are a businessman it is nice to be 'unreachable' while you are on a longhaul flight. If you need to make a phone call then you can but there's not really much point. I once made a call when flying from Dubai to Singapore (Emirates), somewhere over the Indian Ocean - a complete waste of time - crackles, drops in and out and definately not cheap.


User currently offlineBA787 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2006, 2596 posts, RR: 7
Reply 18, posted (7 years 7 months 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 2978 times:

Does this mean we will have "quiet class" like on GNER and Virgin Trains

User currently offlineAirframeAS From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 14150 posts, RR: 24
Reply 19, posted (7 years 7 months 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 2966 times:

Quoting Tugger (Reply 16):
Wasn't being mis-leading

It is... look below....

Quoting Tugger (Thread starter):
OH NO-It's HERE, Cell Phones In Flight!

Thats not specific...IMO.. It should be "Int'l carriers allow cell phones inflight"

Quoting Tugger (Reply 16):
And this isn't a "US only" board.

Im the last to know that??  sarcastic 

Quoting Tugger (Reply 16):
It is very international.

Really? The majority of the users are U.S. residents. But thats for another thread.

Quoting USAirPlatinum (Reply 17):

I stand corrected, my bad...



A Safe Flight Begins With Quality Maintenance On The Ground.
User currently offlineCtbarnes From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 3491 posts, RR: 50
Reply 20, posted (7 years 7 months 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 2795 times:

Quoting Evan767 (Reply 3):
Didn't VS say that they were enforcing a text-only deal? NO talking, texting only? Sounds good to me.

Good luck enforcing it...

EK, IMHO, have done something shrewd here. They've priced it so people will think twice before switching on, and this ultimately will cut down on the idle chatter.

Charles, SJ



The customer isn't a moron, she is your wife -David Ogilvy
User currently offlineExFATboy From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 2974 posts, RR: 9
Reply 21, posted (7 years 7 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 2602 times:

If voice service ever catches on, my solution to this will be the same as my solution to the loud kid problem - noise-cancelling headphones and an iPod.

Maybe it's time to buy Bose stock?  Silly


User currently offlineEvan767 From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 2957 posts, RR: 2
Reply 22, posted (7 years 7 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 2576 times:

Quoting USAirPlatinum (Reply 14):
Even carriers on the brink of collapse, like Delta, could afford that.

Last I checked, Delta isn't on the brink of collapse.



The proper term is "on final" not "on finals" bud...
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
UH OH...No Window? posted Fri Apr 21 2006 23:00:57 by LawrenceMck
Oh No, Eurowhite KLM posted Mon Jan 2 2006 18:52:06 by B742
Oh No! Conspiracy! A380 Rudder Fell Off! posted Thu May 5 2005 16:44:01 by Birdwatching
17) Peter Max OH NO! Anther Thread... posted Sat Dec 11 2004 09:49:17 by Iahcsr
12)Peter Max ... OH NO..He's Back! posted Fri Oct 29 2004 22:07:47 by Iahcsr
OH NO! DL To Satrt FLL-ATL 1X Weekly! posted Mon Aug 16 2004 16:09:31 by Flairport
Oh No! Not Another NW DC-9 Thread... posted Thu Mar 4 2004 02:35:41 by FLYtoEGCC
Oh No! Not Another Trivia Quiz! posted Fri Jan 26 2001 17:50:32 by Matt D
Oh No! posted Wed May 31 2000 18:25:22 by Boeing747-400
Why Do Some LTU 333's Have No Middle OH Bins? posted Fri Jul 27 2001 02:36:31 by Tupolev154B2