Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why Is There A Delta 767-300 In Cotonou, Benin?  
User currently offlineGLAGAZ From UK - Scotland, joined Feb 2004, 1983 posts, RR: 11
Posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 5425 times:

Anyone know the reason for this? Diversion i presume.

Gaz


Neutrality means that u don't really care cos the struggle goes on even when ur not there, blind and unaware
16 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineEWRCabincrew From United States of America, joined May 2006, 5527 posts, RR: 56
Reply 1, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 5410 times:

Maybe an issue with the Accra airport? Try checking the DL website for flifo on DL's ACC flight or the DAK/JNB flight.

Edit that. Just checked the DL website. DL 166 diverted to COO. Apparently an issue at ACC. It arrived ACC at 1528 local time.

[Edited 2007-01-04 17:17:04]


You can't cure stupid
User currently offlineB747-437B From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 5369 times:

Yes, DL 166 inbound ACC diverted COO reporting poor visibility in Accra.

Sitting right here about 100 yards from ACC airport, I cannot for the life of me imagine why they decided to do that. Every other flight has been in and out of here today without hassles. If this kind of visibility is an issue for Delta, they are going to get totally screwed when Harmattan is in full swing.

[Edited 2007-01-04 17:21:36]

User currently offlineFoxBravo From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 3008 posts, RR: 4
Reply 3, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 5236 times:

Even more interesting, today's return flight (DL167), which is now scheduled to leave ACC in about 15 minutes at 5:10 pm local, is showing a scheduled diversion to SJU en route to JFK, with a scheduled arrival in NY at 1:15 am. Ouch--long day for those passengers!


Common sense is not so common. -Voltaire
User currently offlineEWRCabincrew From United States of America, joined May 2006, 5527 posts, RR: 56
Reply 4, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 5205 times:

Quoting FoxBravo (Reply 3):
Even more interesting, today's return flight (DL167), which is now scheduled to leave ACC in about 15 minutes at 5:10 pm local, is showing a scheduled diversion to SJU en route to JFK, with a scheduled arrival in NY at 1:15 am. Ouch--long day for those passengers!

I was thinking that might be a glitch in DL's site. I think that DL 166 continues to SJU from JFK. Maybe it is just showing the final destination, as opposed to the enroute destination. I find it hard to believe that DL would send that plane to SJU non-stop. Although SJU is closer by 600 or so miles.

Where are the DL people here to clarify?



You can't cure stupid
User currently offlineB747-437B From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 5152 times:

Its probably a payload issue. Temperatures today are stifling and the later afternoon departure may affect the ability to lift the full load of pax and cargo.

User currently offlineFoxBravo From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 3008 posts, RR: 4
Reply 6, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 5137 times:

Quoting EWRCabincrew (Reply 4):
I was thinking that might be a glitch in DL's site.

Yeah, that crossed my mind too (and for the sake of the passengers, I hope it is!). However, DL doesn't fly JFK-SJU. Perhaps there are unusually strong headwinds or other weather conditions requiring a fuel stop, although if that were the case there would be less out-of-the-way places to refuel, such as TFN or PDL. On the other hand, DL has operations at SJU and fuel (as well as a new flight crew if necessary) would be more readily available.

In any event, the flight is apparently now boarding for a 2:10 am arrival at JFK (and still showing a diversion via SJU).

Edit: Thanks, Sean--the heat would also explain it.

[Edited 2007-01-04 18:16:33]


Common sense is not so common. -Voltaire
User currently offlineWorldTraveler From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 5069 times:

DL does fly SJUJFK.

The return crew could be close to timing out if they waited at ACC for the arrival.


User currently offlineFoxBravo From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 3008 posts, RR: 4
Reply 8, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 5047 times:

Quoting WorldTraveler (Reply 7):
DL does fly SJUJFK.

You're right, my mistake. But they don't use 763ERs on the route.



Common sense is not so common. -Voltaire
User currently offlineB747-437B From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 5047 times:

Quoting WorldTraveler (Reply 7):
The return crew could be close to timing out if they waited at ACC for the arrival.

Actually, that is probably closer to the truth. The unrealistically scheduled 90 minute scheduled turn in Accra means that the outbound crew is at the airport before the inbound touches down. A diversion means that the clock would be ticking by the time the aircraft gets back to Accra.


User currently offlineEWRCabincrew From United States of America, joined May 2006, 5527 posts, RR: 56
Reply 10, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 5020 times:

Quoting WorldTraveler (Reply 7):
The return crew could be close to timing out if they waited at ACC for the arrival.

Would be more of a pilot issue than f/a issue, I think. F/a's are more expendable than pilots when it comes to rest. Pilots are held to more rigid rules than we are.



You can't cure stupid
User currently offlineFoxBravo From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 3008 posts, RR: 4
Reply 11, posted (7 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 4699 times:

Well, it looks like last night's DL166 diverted to COO again this morning, but with much less of a delay. This time the return flight is scheduled to go nonstop, arriving at JFK about 3 hours late.

Not so bad compared to yesterday's mess--after stopping at SJU, those poor folks finally arrived in NY around 4am, 12 hours behind schedule!



Common sense is not so common. -Voltaire
User currently offlineLouA340 From Canada, joined Oct 2005, 385 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (7 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 4662 times:

If the reasons are because of the visibility issues due to the harmattan, why is it only DL that is diverting to COO? Or is it some other reason?


RyEng
User currently offlineB747-437B From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (7 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 4635 times:

Quoting LouA340 (Reply 12):
If the reasons are because of the visibility issues due to the harmattan, why is it only DL that is diverting to COO?

Good question. Ghana International came in with both 757 (LGW) and 767 (JNB) yesterday without any problems. All airlines except Virgin Nigeria and Delta have been maintaining normal schedules.


User currently offline787KQ From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 549 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (7 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 4528 times:

Is it confirmed that the return was via San Juan?

User currently offlineFoxBravo From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 3008 posts, RR: 4
Reply 15, posted (7 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 4470 times:

Quoting 787KQ (Reply 14):
Is it confirmed that the return was via San Juan?

Yes. Left ACC 6:16 pm, arrived SJU 12:11 am, departed 12:48 am and arrived JFK 3:54 am (all times local).



Common sense is not so common. -Voltaire
User currently offlineB747-437B From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (7 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 4361 times:

Well, it appears that Virgin Nigeria is getting quite slammed now due to the visibility - they are cancelling their 3rd consecutive flight tonight and have about 300 pax sleeping in the airport. They must have RVR of 800m to operate but the tower is evidently calling it as 400m, even though I can clearly see about 1200m from my office window located right by the airport. Bellview and AeroContractors are operating to/from Lagos without any problems and no other flights have been affected.

Just spoke with some folks from Delta and they are laughing about their new 4x weekly JFK-COO service. Interestingly enough, and purely anecdotally (so this cannot be verified through any other source - it is purely hearsay whose veracity has not been determined), the visibility was even lower at COO than it was at ACC before they decided to divert but by the time they got to COO they were too short on fuel to go anywhere else. Welcome to African operations!!!


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Is There A Delta Aircraft Museum In Atlanta? posted Mon Jan 21 2002 05:18:20 by DeltaBoy777
Delta 767-300 In New Colors At Goodyear Airport. posted Fri Dec 28 2001 04:03:15 by Sushka
Why Is There A Gate In The Parking Lot At SXM? posted Thu Nov 30 2006 07:03:16 by SkyHigh777
Why Are Delta 767's Still In BOS Schedule posted Sun Jan 8 2006 20:20:41 by Reggaebird
Why Is There No Low Cost Service In The Midwest? posted Sat Jul 20 2002 14:53:48 by TheHangarCat
Why The Is There An "S" In "Finals" posted Wed May 8 2002 10:37:35 by AviationLaw
Why Is This Delta 777 In Half AA Colors? posted Tue Dec 25 2001 02:53:55 by Airplanetire
TV In Every Seat On Delta 767-300? posted Thu Apr 5 2001 00:39:11 by PearlDrums013
Why Is There A Gap Between The 787-3 And 787-8? posted Tue Sep 19 2006 05:00:13 by JAM747
Updates Of HAs Ex-Delta 767-300 (nonERs) posted Tue Jul 18 2006 20:28:47 by LAHAINA