Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
DL, UA Looking At PMD  
User currently offlineOzarkD9S From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 5198 posts, RR: 21
Posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 4843 times:

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la...efault-underdog&ctrack=1&cset=true

Looks like PMD may be getting airline service back. UA and DL are "interested" with service most likely to SFO/DEN (UA) and SLC (DL). Could this be a renaissance of sorts for PMD?


Next up, STL-ATL-MSY-ATL-STL
17 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineLaxintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 26026 posts, RR: 50
Reply 1, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 4738 times:

What the article does not mention is that the airlines are responding to a RFP put out by LAWA to bring back scheduled services to the airport.

The winning airline will be allocated $900,000 in federal Small Community Air Service Development Program grant funds, while LAWA and the City of Palmdale will thrown in The combined hard-dollar and in-kind commitments $4.6 million over three year period.

The RFP required airlines to commit to multiple daily 50-90 seat jet operations to a Western regional hub for a 3 year period.

Personally I'd say the UA option to SFO would be the most beneficial since after all the LA Basin to Bay Area is the states busiest market and would allow folks in the growing Antelope Valley area a way to get to Northern California conveniently without driving back into LA and using airport such as Burbank, while at the same time providing worldwide connection opportunities via UA's SFO hub.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineAADC10 From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 2102 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 4712 times:

Few airlines would willingly establish service at PMD. LAWA probably twisted their arms to get them to establish service out there while renegotiating leases at LAX under Ch. 11. LAWA needs to get airlines to serve PMD and ONT to satisfy the NIMBY deals made to allow minimal safety improvements to LAX. That is one of the reasons behind the rename to LA/Palmdale. The "regional" approach to air transportation is a proven failure but the NIMBYs back it because it sounds more reasonable than "close LAX."

UA and DL would probably have two RJ flights per day to SFO and SLC respectively. I remember the land speculators who got burned purchasing land near the "international airport" that never really got much service. The killer is going to be that PMD is even further from LA's business centers than ONT. There is a little aerospace out there but it is mostly a bedroom community, which tends to lead to low yields.


User currently offlineBohica From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 2742 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 4695 times:

Quoting OzarkD9S (Thread starter):
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la...efault-underdog&ctrack=1&cset=true

Article requires registration.


User currently offlineFATFlyer From United States of America, joined May 2001, 5843 posts, RR: 28
Reply 4, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 4679 times:

A little more info is in this article:
Palmdale airport gets 2 airline bids
http://www.dailybreeze.com/news/articles/5108591.html?showAll=y&c=y

Also as a side note I just drove through the Santa Clarita area on I-5 this week.

I couldn't help but notice the large billboard next to the freeway encouraging people to drive north and use BFL for flights.

Given the traffic congestion in the 2 mile stretch of the 5/405/210/14 mix I could see a few people might consider going to PMD or BFL instead of south to BUR, ONT, or LAX.



"Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry, and narrow-mindedness." - Mark Twain
User currently offlineDL777LAX From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 521 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 4663 times:

Quoting AADC10 (Reply 2):
The killer is going to be that PMD is even further from LA's business centers than ONT. There is a little aerospace out there but it is mostly a bedroom community, which tends to lead to low yields.



Quoting Laxintl (Reply 1):
The winning airline will be allocated $900,000 in federal Small Community Air Service Development Program grant funds, while LAWA and the City of Palmdale will thrown in The combined hard-dollar and in-kind commitments $4.6 million over three year period.

I doubt that they would need much more then the $5.5M in subsidies

Although, this just shows how much sprawl there is in the south land. The amount of construction going on in Palmdale, which a few years ago seemed like it was in the middle of nowhere is staggering.

And, stupid NIMBYs. I say we have 747s go over there houses all night long. Its the 5th busiest airport in the country/world (forgot which) for Christ sakes. Its been a busy airport for a long time.



Blindly following anything is bad, unless of course your blind and your following a guide dog.
User currently offlineWorldTraveler From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 4584 times:

Service to DEN or SLC is far more valuable than service to SFO.

It doesn't hurt that both UA and DL still have significant outstanding financial commitments to LAWA (UA's BK case re: LAX is still not closed). DL or UA would certainly benefit by getting this service.


User currently offlineSLCUT2777 From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 4126 posts, RR: 9
Reply 7, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 4572 times:

Quoting FATFlyer (Reply 4):
Given the traffic congestion in the 2 mile stretch of the 5/405/210/14 mix I could see a few people might consider going to PMD or BFL instead of south to BUR, ONT, or LAX.

That along with NIMBY's is what keeps So. Calif. from building any more airports. The military chooses to close a base and the NIMBY's all gather to force destruction of the airfield (El Toro). The CEQA laws give the NIMBY too much power in California.



DELTA Air Lines; The Only Way To Fly from Salt Lake City; Let the Western Heritage always be with Delta!
User currently offlineFATFlyer From United States of America, joined May 2001, 5843 posts, RR: 28
Reply 8, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 4544 times:

Quoting SLCUT2777 (Reply 7):
That along with NIMBY's is what keeps So. Calif. from building any more airports.

I'm not sure I see how traffic congestion stops the building of more airports.  Confused

Quoting SLCUT2777 (Reply 7):
The military chooses to close a base and the NIMBY's all gather to force destruction of the airfield (El Toro). The CEQA laws give the NIMBY too much power in California.

It wasn't CEQA that stopped a commercial field at El Toro, it was the ballot box. Orange County voters chose to say no, a choice I personally disagreed with. But that has been hashed out on a.net many times before.

I agree that CEQA can sometimes go too far.

On the other hand having lived through California growth before CEQA I've seen what happens when the developers and politicians had too much power to ramrod development through no matter what.

Unfortunately we never seem to find a good balance between the 2 poles.



"Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry, and narrow-mindedness." - Mark Twain
User currently offlineLAXdude1023 From India, joined Sep 2006, 7759 posts, RR: 25
Reply 9, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 4535 times:

Palmdale and the Antelope Valley are growing very fast. Its cheaper to live on the other side of the San Gabriel Mountains than it is to live in the basin. The area is one of the few "middle class" areas of Los Angeles county. I think service to PMD would be very profitable for the airlines.


Stewed...Lewd...Crude...Irreverent...Belligerent
User currently offlineSLCUT2777 From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 4126 posts, RR: 9
Reply 10, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 4507 times:

Quoting FATFlyer (Reply 8):
I'm not sure I see how traffic congestion stops the building of more airports. confused 

It is mostly the noise issues that people will use to protest and attempt to stop airport development. Orange County is a classic case in point. Look at the slot restrictions and a/c types tha can go into SNA, and the departure procedures that must be used at that airport.

Quoting FATFlyer (Reply 8):
Orange County voters chose to say no, a choice I personally disagreed with. But that has been hashed out on a.net many times before.

I'm well aware of the El Toro situation, and how similar to what San Diego voters just did to Mirimar. Yes there were many wonderful threads here on a.net surrounding that most contentious issue. In California in particular property values can be an incredibly contentious and often times more emotional issue with respects to CEQA, and the number of cases that end up in litigation is staggering.

Quoting FATFlyer (Reply 8):
I agree that CEQA can sometimes go too far.

California has far too many lawyers that love to take advantage of this and the almighty $$$ talks when lawyers get involved in anything.



DELTA Air Lines; The Only Way To Fly from Salt Lake City; Let the Western Heritage always be with Delta!
User currently offlineFATFlyer From United States of America, joined May 2001, 5843 posts, RR: 28
Reply 11, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 4341 times:

Quoting SLCUT2777 (Reply 10):
It is mostly the noise issues that people will use to protest and attempt to stop airport development. Orange County is a classic case in point. Look at the slot restrictions and a/c types tha can go into SNA, and the departure procedures that must be used at that airport.

SNA is a grandfathered case. The noise and slot restrictions at SNA, LGB and TVL all date back to the late 1970s to mid 1980s, before other areas even considered them.

As a result Congress passed the Airport Noise Act which limits existing airports from putting in new noise rules such as slots and curfews. So the complaints, methods and results used then no longer hold up. Classic case sure but no other area can follow that path to stop airport development.

Quoting SLCUT2777 (Reply 10):
I'm well aware of the El Toro situation, and how similar to what San Diego voters just did to Mirimar.

And in both cases I also think they made the wrong choice. Both bases should have been a part of the transportation infrastructure in some form. But I vote in Fresno and had no say.

Quoting SLCUT2777 (Reply 10):
California has far too many lawyers that love to take advantage of this and the almighty $$$ talks when lawyers get involved in anything.

FYI, California per thousand residents has fewer lawyers than Massachusetts, NY state, Illinois, and other states. Yet California is the largest state by population and also home to a number of financial/service industries and corporate HQ that would require attorneys on staff which would skew the number upward.

Money really talked before CEQA put limits on unfettered development without mitigation.

There was no concern about the effects of a new development on transportation, neighborhoods, noise, environment, etc. If it added tax dollars or population it could get pushed through.

Back then it was easy to downplay the impact or say it wasn't the responsibility of the developer or even local government to consider how those people in a new subdivision would get to their jobs. So new building happened without mitigation such as better roads. The impact on water quality, sewer plants, existing residents, schools, parks, etc was simply ignored if it was inconvenient or costly.

Look at the sprawl that occurred in California without CEQA in the 1960s to 1980s to see the other side. There is a reason people used to point at California as the poster child of uncontrolled sprawl and development.

As I said, CEQA has swung things too far the other way by being overly cumbersome but before CEQA it was do whatever and don't worry about the impacts.



"Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry, and narrow-mindedness." - Mark Twain
User currently offlineWN230 From United States of America, joined Jul 2006, 341 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 6 days ago) and read 4075 times:

Quoting Laxintl (Reply 1):
Personally I'd say the UA option to SFO would be the most beneficial since after all the LA Basin to Bay Area is the states busiest market and would allow folks in the growing Antelope Valley area a way to get to Northern California conveniently without driving back into LA and using airport such as Burbank, while at the same time providing worldwide connection opportunities via UA's SFO hub.

I second your decision for two reasons. One, you have an airport without the congestion that BUR and LAX have. Two, traffic is bad enough when your driving south of Palmdale, but when (if) your caught in the traffic jams on the 14, this would make trying to connect to a flight down in L.A. would become a
 banghead  experience for a traveller in the PMD area if the airport weren't served by UA or DL or any airline.

That's my  twocents .

WN230



Judas Priest North American tour in '08 . . . cannot wait!!!
User currently offlineAznCSA4QF744ER From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 695 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 3823 times:

Sound like SkyWest or ASA will be flying this route weather UA or DL gets it.

User currently offlineDAL767400ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 3371 times:

Quoting AznCSA4QF744ER (Reply 13):
Sound like SkyWest or ASA will be flying this route weather UA or DL gets it.

Actually, it is likely guaranteed to be Skywest, because ASA on the West Coast only flies the CR7s. However, PMD would be served with no bigger than a CRJ-200, so it'll just be a question in which carrier's colors Skywest will operate those planes.


User currently offlineTsnamm From United States of America, joined May 2005, 631 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 3320 times:

Didn't HP fly to Palmdale in the early 90's to LAS and PHX? What ever happened to their service?

User currently offlineAznCSA4QF744ER From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 695 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 2402 times:

Quoting DAL767400ER (Reply 14):
it is likely guaranteed to be Skywest, because ASA on the West Coast only flies the CR7s.

That is incorrect. ASA operate both CR7's and CR2's at LAX.


User currently offlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26718 posts, RR: 75
Reply 17, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 3 days ago) and read 2360 times:

Quoting OzarkD9S (Thread starter):
Looks like PMD may be getting airline service back. UA and DL are "interested" with service most likely to SFO/DEN (UA) and SLC (DL). Could this be a renaissance of sorts for PMD?

Interesting that they are trying PMD again, given the lack of success before and the low yield nature.

Quoting DL777LAX (Reply 5):
Its the 5th busiest airport in the country/world (forgot which) for Christ sakes.

World. Third in the US

Quoting SLCUT2777 (Reply 10):
California has far too many lawyers that love to take advantage of this and the almighty $$$ talks when lawyers get involved in anything.

You have got to be kidding me.



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
DL Looking At Republic To Replace Mesa At JFK posted Tue Aug 15 2006 16:18:12 by UN_B732
UA 777 At SJC? posted Mon Dec 18 2006 19:42:03 by SJCRRPAX
UA 757 At GRR? posted Mon Dec 18 2006 04:33:48 by KingAir200
UAL Says Looking At 787 And A350 posted Tue Dec 12 2006 19:10:05 by NYC777
SWF Looking At Terminal Expansion posted Mon Dec 4 2006 22:02:20 by BigOrange
US/DL/UA/CO/AA/NW Merger posted Thu Nov 16 2006 22:25:36 by JBo
DL Sales Staff At Disney World posted Thu Nov 16 2006 08:03:56 by GFA330
DL-UA Merger? posted Thu Nov 16 2006 04:59:52 by Iloveboeing
FlyBe Looking At Newcastle-CPH/FRA/STR/DUS posted Wed Nov 8 2006 11:58:55 by Gkirk
Connecting From DL To NW At MSP posted Mon Nov 6 2006 07:31:41 by Copaair737