WMUPilot From United States of America, joined Jan 2003, 1473 posts, RR: 12
Reply 1, posted (7 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 2815 times:
I'll bet it will be more Florida destinations. BOS-SWF had been rumored on the 190 but I don't know if that will happen. If they want to increase the traffic they need to add some flights to one of the east coast hub cities.
JetBlueAtJFK From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 1687 posts, RR: 3
Reply 5, posted (7 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days ago) and read 2473 times:
I could see them either:
-Adding some more frequencies on MCO or FLL or PBI
-Adding TPA and RSW
-Doing something like stated in Reply 4-a redeye out to LAS to make use of the planes waiting around. If they add more to the existing or add more cities, a redeye.
Spinkid From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 1097 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (7 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days ago) and read 2428 times:
I would be positevely giddy with excitement if they added a red eye to LAS. One of my biggest reasons for not taking the red eyes back to JFK is that once you land at around 6am after not really sleeping, you have to get your bags, find your way back to your car and battle traffic on the Van Wyck and Whitestone all the way back to Connecticut where I live.
landing at SWF is a 45 minute straight shot with no traffic to my house. I fully plan on supporting both jetBlue and AirTran at SWF.