Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Narrowbody International Service U.S. Carriers  
User currently offlineThrust From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 2690 posts, RR: 10
Posted (7 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 1828 times:

Well, so far it appears that almost every airline of The Big Five (American, Continental, Delta, Northwest, United) in the U.S. has added more widebodies and even narrow-bodies to their international front except for United. DL recently announced that they will be sending all their widebodies to the international front as well as some 757s. So far the only carriers that have not shown intentions put the 757 on the international front is United (I believe NW was sending their 757s to Guam and Tokyo awhile back, do not know if that's still the case) I guess my question is why is United not going along with everyone else and putting all of their widebodies and even some 757s on their transatlantic routes? They have 763ERs that they appear to be keeping on the domestic front while the 757 is seeing no overseas action whatsoever save perhaps the Caribbean and Hawaii. I guess I was wondering if someone could tell me if United has any plans for the 757 to fly to Europe or to put all of their 767s on the international routes like DL did...or are they not necessary because of UA's domestic 777s?


Fly one thing; Fly it well
3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineRwSEA From Netherlands, joined Jan 2005, 3110 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (7 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 1798 times:

When you say "International", I'm assuming that you're talking about Transatlantic and Transpacific. My response follows that assumption.

Quoting Thrust (Thread starter):
DL recently announced that they will be sending all their widebodies to the international front as well as some 757s

I don't know if they've announced anything, rather, it's based off a magazine article and some heresay. DL's route network needs some widebodies domestically, and while their 763's (non-ER) can make it from JFK to the UK, they can't really be used to open up new routes. We might see them replace some 764's to Hawaii though. The ex-TWA planes will be used for Hawaii and Europe.

Quoting Thrust (Thread starter):
(I believe NW was sending their 757s to Guam and Tokyo awhile back, do not know if that's still the case)

NW does base a lot of 757's in NRT for intra-Asia service. They're also planning to send some TATL next summer, to AMS, BRU, and DUS among others.

Quoting Thrust (Thread starter):
So far the only carriers that have not shown intentions put the 757 on the international front is United

It's been said before on this board that UA's 757s have less powerful engines that are not conducive to TATL operations.

Quoting Thrust (Thread starter):
I guess I was wondering if someone could tell me if United has any plans for the 757 to fly to Europe or to put all of their 767s on the international routes like DL did...or are they not necessary because of UA's domestic 777s?

757 probably not based on the above. With respect to the domestic 767/777, those are needed for UA's very strong Hawaii operations. Don't know about the 763's, but the 777's are the non-ER versions which significantly limits range. They might be able to do IAD-Europe, but probably not much more than that.

If UA decided to add more TATL flights (with a 763), LIS seems like a good candidate. It's a Star Alliance hub, is very successful for CO/US, and is relatively close range-wise. Might be a good candidate for a non-ER plane.


User currently offlineLouA340 From Canada, joined Oct 2005, 385 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (7 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 1759 times:

Well, I'd presume the reason is that unlike the other airlines that are a bit constricted on aircrafts for their international destinations, UA has enough to carry out their operations. They are also not doing any international expansions like DL or CO and so theres no need add the narrow bodies to international duties.


RyEng
User currently offlineThrust From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 2690 posts, RR: 10
Reply 3, posted (7 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 1698 times:

Yes...I mean transatlantically and transpacifically...sorry for not clearing that up earlier.


Fly one thing; Fly it well
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Low Cost International Service From/To India posted Mon Jul 17 2006 02:55:37 by Ammunition
International Charter Carriers Now Serving Varna posted Thu Dec 15 2005 20:52:20 by Orion737
Fares - Full Service Carriers / LCCs, Which? posted Thu Dec 1 2005 15:14:46 by Captaink
Rumor Of Long-Haul International Service At TIJ posted Thu Nov 17 2005 20:22:54 by DCAYOW
Possible International Service For BDL posted Wed Nov 9 2005 01:09:38 by Flytweed
International Service With NW posted Tue Apr 26 2005 00:18:02 by Hjulicher
NW Boeing 742 Pax Gone From International Service? posted Thu Dec 9 2004 02:07:15 by Thrust
International Service From BOS posted Sun Nov 14 2004 08:25:31 by Zrs70
LOT's International Service During Communism posted Tue Nov 9 2004 21:08:58 by Targowski
International Service From A Non Hub! posted Fri Sep 24 2004 01:54:01 by NWDC10