Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
UA At BTR Why Not?  
User currently offlineCleared2Land4 From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 176 posts, RR: 0
Posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 2527 times:

With the large increase in population in BTR UA would be profitable. Would it make sense to cut a few flights at MSY and start up at BTR?


United Airlines... "It's Time to Fly."
7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineUnited777atGU From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 183 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 2466 times:

I completely agree. I remember two of my friends telling me that an enormous amount of people have since moved to BTR from MSY. Although it came as a shock to BTR, they are trying to handle the capacity as best as they can, and I believe they will accomodate as best as possible. They will need the service. Starting service will help the city's economy, provide more jobs, etc. Great observation buddy.


Speechless
User currently offlineTom in NO From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 7194 posts, RR: 33
Reply 2, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 2459 times:

Quoting Cleared2Land4 (Thread starter):
Would it make sense to cut a few flights at MSY and start up at BTR?

Considering that the load factors at MSY are higher than ever, that's probably not the way to go.

Also, traffic at BTR has slacked off recently. Airlines are in fact pulling back some of the flights that were added post-Katrina.

Tom at MSY



"The criminal ineptitude makes you furious"-Bruce Springsteen, after seeing firsthand the damage from Hurricane Katrina
User currently offlineMSYtristar From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 6520 posts, RR: 51
Reply 3, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 2441 times:

Quoting Tom in NO (Reply 2):
Also, traffic at BTR has slacked off recently

Yes it has. The airlines that went mainline to BTR right after the storm (AA and DL) are now back to RJ's only, and several of the new routes...BTR-STL/LGA/EWR for example....have been discontinued.

BTR now is pretty much the same capacity wise as BTR before the storm, with the exception of of one DL Connection flight to MCO and DCA, and one AA Eagle to ORD.

UA won't pull New Orleans flights and put them in BTR...in fact UA will be upgrading one of the ORD E70's back to a 733 come next month.


User currently offlineTrey From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 250 posts, RR: 5
Reply 4, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 2414 times:

here you go. from www.businessreport.com today::



TODAY’S HEADLINES / January 9, 2007

Metro Council to vote on incentive package for Denver flights
The Metro Council is scheduled to vote Wednesday on a $1 million incentive package aimed at luring an airline to offer flights from Baton Rouge Metro Airport to Denver. Ronnie Pickard, airport spokesman, says Denver is one of the better hubs because so many airlines fly into the city and it offers a chance for connecting flights farther west and outside the United States. "That's our biggest void of service," Pickard says. By offering $1 million, Metro Airport will be able to help an airline offset the start-up costs of establishing service. Getting funding from the community to subsidize air service is a trend in the industry, Pickard says. Earlier this year Anthony Marino, director of aviation, said Metro Airport was $1 million away from bringing in a discount air carrier. Pickard says the Denver incentive would be open to the first airline willing to establish service from Baton Rouge to the Rockies, discount carrier or not.
In other airport news, Mayor-President Kip Holden held a press conference this morning to speak on behalf of Delta Air Lines, which has a significant presence at the local airport. Delta is fighting a hostile takeover bid from US Airways. The airline is lining up leaders in various communities to speak out against the US Airways deal, Pickard says.


User currently offlineUnited777atGU From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 183 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 2373 times:

Oops, yea, I don't complete agree.

Quoting Cleared2Land4 (Thread starter):
Would it make sense to cut a few flights at MSY and start up at BTR?

Nah, don' t do that. Not good for MSY at all. Add more flights. Be competitive. Don't cut to add. Just add. If it doesn't do well, which MSY does, cut it. In this case, just add to BTR and leave MSY alone.



Speechless
User currently offlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26361 posts, RR: 76
Reply 6, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 2324 times:

Quoting Cleared2Land4 (Thread starter):
Would it make sense to cut a few flights at MSY and start up at BTR?

Not at all, particularly seeing that MSY is an excellent station for United, particularly their LAX-MSY movie shuttles.

Quoting MSYtristar (Reply 3):
UA won't pull New Orleans flights and put them in BTR...in fact UA will be upgrading one of the ORD E70's back to a 733 come next month.

Not to mention their return to mainline on LAX-MSY.



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineUnitedMSY From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 2299 times:

The E170's are here just for Mardi Gras, and then they become a 170 again. MSY should be in the pool for more service, not decreased service. They have done a good job stealing pax from the neighboring BTR and GPT.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why ARJ 85 At LH? Why Not ARJ 70? posted Tue Apr 24 2001 15:03:10 by Airsicknessbag
UA And AirTran...why Not? posted Thu Dec 21 2000 09:57:04 by ILUV767
British Airways @ Heathrow T3 Why Not Also At T2? posted Fri Nov 3 2006 13:52:08 by 8herveg
Why Not US Airways Hubs At LGA And DCA? posted Sat Feb 5 2005 16:31:11 by ACAfan
UA And IAD-NRT...why Not? posted Fri Sep 24 2004 04:57:57 by SHUPirate1
Boeing At Farnborough: Why A 747 And Not A 777 posted Mon Jul 26 2004 13:12:16 by Tolosy
UA 744 At Prague....why? posted Fri Feb 20 2004 19:06:24 by Jmc1975
Why Not A Major Hub At IND? posted Thu May 8 2003 07:38:01 by Aroundtheworld
Why Not More Middle East Flights At DTW? posted Mon Apr 7 2003 20:55:13 by Dtw/ord fan!
Why Not Southwest At Dia? posted Mon Nov 19 2001 05:36:45 by Brett80211