Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Vought/Alenia: 787 Update Sheet  
User currently offlineBeech19 From United States of America, joined Jul 2006, 936 posts, RR: 4
Posted (7 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 5213 times:

I was searching around on the Vought website and found this interesting page.

http://www.vought.com/newsFactGallery/SC_news/SC_update.htm

Some highlights:
Image of Section 47 (pre-production).
Updates on a weekly basis.
Vought has received notification that the autoclave they have for the 787 is the largest in the world by volume.

Hopefully we will see images of the tail (Section 47+48 combined) and also the central fues(Sections 43, 44, 45, 46) soon.  Smile

Can't wait to start putting it together!


KPAE via KBVY
14 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAviator27 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (7 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 5126 times:

I think that picture is mirrored because no cargo door is on the port side of the airplane. Well, not unless Boeing is planning on changing that. Wow, that piece looks smooth and clean. It has to reduce parasite drag by a tremendous amount. I can't wait for those birds to fly and for me to change from Airbus to Boeing guy.

User currently offlineRheinbote From Germany, joined May 2006, 1968 posts, RR: 52
Reply 2, posted (7 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 5111 times:

Thanks Beech19, great find.

Looks like they put a post-processed section (windows and doors cut out, primer put on etc.) back to the mandrel for demo-purposes.

Looking at the picture it seems to me that the position of stringers is discernible from the outside, where kind of longitudinal 'sink marks' are visible or the surface became faceted somhow while curing. I noted the same when watching a primered, yet unpainted CFRP rear fuselage of an A380. IIRC it's referred to as 'Zeppelin-Skin' at Airbus.

Watching pictures of painted 787 pre-production sections, I saw nothing like that. Are the 'sink-marks' filled or facets smoothed before painting or will the surface be left 'as-is'? The pre-prod samples looked shiny like a mirror...

[Edited 2007-01-15 20:47:48]

User currently offlineSammyk From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 1689 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (7 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 5032 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Aviator27 (Reply 1):
I think that picture is mirrored because no cargo door is on the port side of the airplane.

Actually there are and that looks like a bulk cargo door...or are you saying the 787 is not supposed to have one?


User currently offlineBeech19 From United States of America, joined Jul 2006, 936 posts, RR: 4
Reply 4, posted (7 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 5023 times:

Quoting Rheinbote (Reply 2):
Watching pictures of painted 787 pre-production sections, I saw nothing like that. Are the 'sink-marks' filled or facets smoothed before painting or will the surface be left 'as-is'? The pre-prod samples looked shiny like a mirror...

Yeah... the peices i have seen up close and personal are very smooth, shiny and show no "zeplin skin". I don't know if they are smoothed afterword or if this one (since it is pre-production and i know they tweaked the process a little) is a pre-tweak version. Very nice either way.  Smile

There is one "stringer indent" on this peice that I think that is just a mark on the peice because there is no stringer that runs across the door/window area on the fues barrel we have (KHI Section 43) to work on.



KPAE via KBVY
User currently offlineBeech19 From United States of America, joined Jul 2006, 936 posts, RR: 4
Reply 5, posted (7 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 5003 times:

Quoting Aviator27 (Reply 1):
I think that picture is mirrored because no cargo door is on the port side of the airplane.

Its a bulk cargo door... and yes they are on the left side. Its not mirrored...

See page 12 of the Airplane Description information:
http://www.boeing.com/commercial/airports/acaps/787sec2.pdf



KPAE via KBVY
User currently offlineIkramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21456 posts, RR: 60
Reply 6, posted (7 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 4972 times:

That design looks like you could stack them like cups or chairs.

Quoting Beech19 (Reply 4):
There is one "stringer indent" on this peice that I think that is just a mark on the peice

Looks like it's made by a dirty roller or a roller made of a black rubber material. Something involved in moving the piece around?



Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlineBeech19 From United States of America, joined Jul 2006, 936 posts, RR: 4
Reply 7, posted (7 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 4949 times:

Quoting Ikramerica (Reply 6):
That design looks like you could stack them like cups or chairs.

I had that same thought! Just stack a bunch and then load them all in the LCF at the same time. lol

Quoting Ikramerica (Reply 6):
Something involved in moving the piece around?

That was my assumption...



KPAE via KBVY
User currently offlineRheinbote From Germany, joined May 2006, 1968 posts, RR: 52
Reply 8, posted (7 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 4895 times:

Quoting Beech19 (Reply 4):
There is one "stringer indent" on this peice that I think that is just a mark on the peice because there is no stringer that runs across the door/window area on the fues barrel we have (KHI Section 43) to work on.

I guess the faint 'streak' running across the window cutouts is a mark left by the OML caul plates.


User currently offlineAviator27 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (7 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 4862 times:

Quoting Sammyk (Reply 3):
Actually there are and that looks like a bulk cargo door...or are you saying the 787 is not supposed to have one?

I know its a bulk cargo door. I just thought it should have been on the other side. I stand corrected. Everything is fine.

B787 Detailed Technical Information

Big version: Width: 449 Height: 378 File size: 46kb
B787 Ground Servicing


User currently offlineLexy From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 2515 posts, RR: 9
Reply 10, posted (7 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 4842 times:

Can anyone tell me if the Vought factory in Nashville is doing any work on the 787??? I haven't heard either way.


Nashville, Tennessee KBNA
User currently offlineBeech19 From United States of America, joined Jul 2006, 936 posts, RR: 4
Reply 11, posted (7 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 4786 times:

Quoting Lexy (Reply 10):
Can anyone tell me if the Vought factory in Nashville is doing any work on the 787??? I haven't heard either way.

No. Vought built a brand new factory at CHS to build the Section 47 and 48. Next to that build the Vought/Alenia co-op built another facility that is integrators. They will attach and finish the Section 47/48 tail and also the 43/44/45/46 central fuesalage.

http://www.vought.com/ProdProg/commercial/boeing787.htm



KPAE via KBVY
User currently offlineNYC777 From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 5731 posts, RR: 48
Reply 12, posted (7 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 4652 times:

I thought that pics of the mandrels are verboten! No one has gotten picture of a 787 mandrel in public until now and I have thought it was because of propreitary trade secrets information.

Boeing doesn't want to show its hand in how they produce the fuselage barrels.

Did someone at Vought screw up?

Am I right or wrong?



That which does not kill me makes me stronger.
User currently offlineBeech19 From United States of America, joined Jul 2006, 936 posts, RR: 4
Reply 13, posted (7 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 4624 times:

Quoting NYC777 (Reply 12):
I thought that pics of the mandrels are verboten! No one has gotten picture of a 787 mandrel in public until now and I have thought it was because of propreitary trade secrets information.

Boeing has video of the process on their website.

http://www.newairplane.com (click on 787: Innovative Features: Cutting Edge Technolog: Advance Composite Design)

It is a trade secret but its also patented, you can only do so much without getting into some deep DOO-DOO at this point.  Smile



KPAE via KBVY
User currently offlineLexy From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 2515 posts, RR: 9
Reply 14, posted (7 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 4509 times:

Quoting Beech19 (Reply 11):
No. Vought built a brand new factory at CHS to build the Section 47 and 48. Next to that build the Vought/Alenia co-op built another facility that is integrators. They will attach and finish the Section 47/48 tail and also the 43/44/45/46 central fuesalage.

Hey thanks alot. Cool.



Nashville, Tennessee KBNA
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Possible Aer Lingus A350/787 Update posted Tue Dec 6 2005 13:55:00 by EI321
Boeing 787 Update - Where Are The Pics? posted Tue Aug 2 2005 11:32:41 by Emirates2005
EL AL Update: 787 And 350 posted Fri May 12 2006 13:47:11 by Amirs
CX:787, 747-8, And A380 All On Fleet Renewal Sheet posted Tue Apr 4 2006 06:17:21 by Jacobin777
787 Program Update posted Thu Nov 17 2005 11:27:47 by N1786b
787 Orders Update posted Thu Aug 11 2005 10:14:02 by QF744
Boeing's 787 Program Fact Sheet posted Mon Apr 25 2005 01:00:49 by BoeingBus
787 Order Update posted Mon Mar 28 2005 03:16:02 by L.1011
Any Update On Primaris 737 & 787 Order posted Sun Jan 30 2005 21:01:03 by PANAM_DC10
DTW Weather Update posted Mon Jan 15 2007 03:11:02 by Nwafflyer