Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
British Airports  
User currently offlineAnsett777 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (15 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 969 times:

A few days ago my friend from London flew in from London Heathrow on a BA744 to JFK in New York, and when she was at Heathrow she said it was very messy and very big, but she said Gatwick was pretty nice. Seeing that i havent been to one of them, which one is nicer

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineAhlfors From Canada, joined Oct 2000, 1347 posts, RR: 4
Reply 1, posted (15 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 955 times:

Terminal 4 at Heathrow (for BA intercontinental service) is badly designed and overall a mess. Terminal 1 (for BA Europe flights) is much better organized. BA's terminal at LGW is not very large, and the waiting area is a bit cramped at times. Overall, you are more likely to get lost at LHR than LGW. This is based on personal experience. (I have been at LHR dozens of times, and at LGW a few times).

I believe BA is still going ahead with plans to build a Terminal 5 at Heathrow, which should help out.

User currently offlineCapt.Picard From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (15 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 946 times:

I don't agree that T4 at LHR is badly designed, there is plenty of space for pax, even at peak times, and great views by each gate. The BA Europe/Domestic terminal (T1) is fine, not a problem.

Gatwick North terminal (BA intercontinental/domestic) is badly designed, only in the sense that there are no viewing areas until you arrive outside your gate, and even then they are not great.

Gatwick does get a lot of traffic though, it's in no way a second-rate airport.

User currently offlineTrident From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2000, 484 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (15 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 940 times:

LHR is indeed a very "messy" airport. This is due to its basic layuout which dates back to around 1943. The original plan showed a central terminal area surrounded by multiple runways arranged in a "Star of David" pattern. This layout has hampered expansion and has resulted in most of the smaller crosswind runways being closed and built upon. In fact, construction work at the airport has never ceased since the airport opened in 1946. Terminal 1,2 and 3 are essentially "trapped" in thew centre area with Terminal 4 and the future Terminal 5 out on the perimeter, where ALL the terminals should have been from the beginning. One early plan also showed a secondary smaller airport on the north side of the main airport just across the raod.
Environmentalists had yet to appear in 1943!

User currently offlineScotty From UK - Scotland, joined Dec 1999, 1875 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (15 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 940 times:

Like LHR, most other UK airports have happended rather than being planned. Unlike in AMS which always seems to me to be organised and looking ahead, we build facilities to catch up wiht demand rathar than build facilities to meet expected demand.

User currently offlineLGW From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (15 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 937 times:

Have a look at my user name and guess which one I prefur  

User currently offlineEg777er From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2000, 1844 posts, RR: 13
Reply 6, posted (15 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 933 times:

BAA spends £1 million a DAY! on new construction at Heathrow.

T4 to me has always seemed the best of the LHR terminals - it's easy to get to, easy for check in (that huge hall has loads of space) and then when you get through the passport control the shopping, gates are all well arranged. The only prob is the mammoth walk you have to get to those 'cul-de-sac' gates.

T1 is much better now that it was redesigned airside, but landside the checkin areas are still a mess. Domestic lounge is much better now it has been tidied up.

T2 - haven't been there for a while but apparently it's very nice since the 1996 refurb.

T3 - a bit of a mess really. I think this has to be the worst LHR terminal. It's crowded, the check in area is crap and the duty free/lounges are all a mess.

Terminal 5, when it gets built, will be incredible. There is also a plan to build another Terminal (6?) in the opposite side to T5 (i.e. the maint base) and then extend the satellites all over the central area (which would involve demolishing T1, T2 + T3.)

As soon as T5 is complete BA will transfer all their ops there (Int, Euro and Domestic) which will make transferring at LHR as seamless as at AMS or CDG.

User currently offlineBlink182 From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 5499 posts, RR: 14
Reply 7, posted (15 years 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 918 times:

I have only been to LGW but I will say that transferring airlines/terminals at LGW is a pain, Other than that, LGW is a nice airport, a little confusing though but thats it, no real complaints from me.

Give me a break, I created this username when I was a kid...
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Filming At British Airports posted Sun May 14 2006 19:22:04 by Mogget
BA Managers Will Help Out At British Airports. posted Wed Sep 1 2004 02:20:40 by 777ER
Icy British Airports Today posted Thu Jan 29 2004 09:29:49 by VSGirl
Glass Separators At British Airports - Better Hubs posted Thu Apr 10 2003 20:07:25 by 764
Will British Airports Authority Run JFK posted Thu Jun 28 2001 16:28:24 by BA-747
British Airports posted Sun Nov 5 2000 03:34:30 by Ansett777
U.S. Access To French/British Airports posted Wed Feb 23 2000 21:03:47 by Louis
Latin American Airports Websites posted Thu Nov 23 2006 21:55:35 by XA744
Three UK Airports Prepared For Sale posted Thu Nov 23 2006 20:41:10 by BmiBaby737
Why No Winglets On British Registered B757's? posted Wed Nov 22 2006 12:06:25 by KA501