Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AA Above UA (fleet-wise)  
User currently offlineTWA902fly From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 3125 posts, RR: 4
Posted (13 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 1315 times:

I noticed that on routes such as ORD-MIA American uses (on most flights) their 737-800s, while UA is still dragging its 727s across the country. Where-ever AA has its ERJ-135s and 145s, UA is using the tiny Beech 1900, and EMB-120. I am talking about ORD, their double hub, where AA appears to be placing its best planes, unlike UA. Is there a reason, wand how soon do you think passengers will notice AA having the new plane, and UA having the old one. The oldst AA plane at ORD is the MD-80, no more then 20 years old, which UA has 727-200s, 737-200s, 747-200s, etc... also, AA is using ALL RJs at ORD, while UA is about 50% turboprop and 50% RJ.

-TWA902fly


life wasn't worth the balance, or the crumpled paper it was written on
14 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCX747 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4454 posts, RR: 5
Reply 1, posted (13 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 1274 times:

AA still has over 60 727-200s in service. UA's 747-200s will soon all be retired from service. I am not sure about the status of their 737-200 fleet.


"History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid." D. Eisenhower
User currently offlineBoeing747-400 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (13 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 1270 times:

UAL plans to keep the 732s in service for awhile now.  

Its too bad that the awesome UAL 742s will be gone soon.      


User currently offlineTWA902fly From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 3125 posts, RR: 4
Reply 3, posted (13 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 1268 times:

I know about the AA 727s, but I am mainly talking about ORD, where AA has no 727s. All of those are at MIA and DFW.

-TWA902fly



life wasn't worth the balance, or the crumpled paper it was written on
User currently offlineAA@DFW From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 397 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (13 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 1246 times:

I agree with you!

This is very interesting strategy on AA's part. I think they are trying to keep all of UA's customers that came over to them during the strike this summer.

AA is very adimatley trying to deploy their BEST product and service out at ORD. This will let them take and keep as many of UAs customers as possible.

And the interesting part is...... i think it's working.

AA@DFW


User currently onlineThe777Man From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 6550 posts, RR: 55
Reply 5, posted (13 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1227 times:

I strongly disagree with you. UA fly a lot of A320s, A319s and 757s from ORD. Not to mention that UA has many more widebodies flights from ORd on domestic flights than AA. Also UA has inflight audio entertainment on all aircraft except 737-200 of which UA only has 24. AA has no audio in any of their 727s or their close to 300 M80s. The Beech 1900s are UAX so don't count those as United Airlines aircraft. As mentioned by CX747, AA has almost as many 727s as UA. The777Man


Need a Boeing 777 Firing Order....Further to fly....CI, MU, LX and LH 777s
User currently offlineKonaB777 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (13 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1223 times:

Also, Chicago is United's #1 hub, so they would have all of their aircraft there as all of them end up in Chicago in some form going to other places. Dallas is AA's hub.

User currently offlineSn330 From Belgium, joined Nov 2004, 16 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (13 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1199 times:

Interesting tactics by AA. I know that they have been losing ground at ORD for some time now, and I guess they are trying everything to gain it back.

User currently offlineContinentalEWR From United States of America, joined May 2000, 3762 posts, RR: 13
Reply 8, posted (13 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1196 times:

This is sort of silly. United flies so many different aircraft types into and out of ORD. Besides, AA
just went all 777 on its ORD-LHR route, while UA
has been flying all 777's to LHR for a few years
now. In fact, all of its flights to Europe from
ORD are on the 777 or 767-300 while AA still
flies some 767-200's, which are awful (not
AA's but that plane in general).

American has over 60 727's still in service.

I doubt either airline is using its fleet to win
customers at ORD. They use the aircraft that
are best suited to a route for the airline. That
is the core of airline economics. Airlines really
don't care if you like a DC10 and would want
to fly one from ORD to MIA instead of a 727.

As for the comment about AA's 737's to MIA
the reason for that is simple enough. AA has
a lot of flights to the Caribbean and Latin
America from MIA and the airline is using this
plane now on many routes to the region.
They operate as transcons first, then fly off
to Latin America (Central America, Northern
Latin America, and the Caribbean.)


User currently offlineKrakow5 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (13 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1197 times:

Interesting observation. I chose UA as my carrier of choice because of the fleet differences. AA has very little domestic widebody service out of ORD. When traveling to SFO or LAX, I'd rather be on a 747, 767 or 777 than a 737. In the Midwest, where I do the bulk of business travel, until recently, you were stuck on an ATR to most destinations where UA flew full size jets. I've flown DC 10s to Detroit and Cleveland and 767s to Indianapolis. Talk about space... There is at least some form of inflight entertanment on most UA jets but very few of the AA planes seem to offer anything. The only positive I see with AA's fleet is that the MD-80s have only one middle seat.

My guess is that United's current problems have more to do with AA's increase in market share at ORD than fleet considerations. I've considered switching but consider AA's fleet a negative.


User currently offlineFlyf15 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (13 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1191 times:

If you want to compare aircraft size useage, UA and AA loose out, DL wins.   Pretty much everywhere on comparable routes, Delta has much bigger aircraft. Such as DEN-SLC. DL's SLC hub is tiny compared to UA's DEN but UA uses (largest) 737-300 (Shuttle) while Delta uses up to 767-300 on the route, with just as many flights.

User currently offlineTWA902fly From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 3125 posts, RR: 4
Reply 11, posted (13 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1187 times:

Flyf15: I totally Agree, UA and AA were flying 727s and MD-80s on ORD-SLC while i flew Delta and it was a 767-200 and a 757-200.

-TWA902fly



life wasn't worth the balance, or the crumpled paper it was written on
User currently offlineDebn From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 89 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (13 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1186 times:

AA still sucks. Cuz, there is no IFE in more than half of their planes. I'll take UA over AA anyday.

User currently offlineDoug From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 853 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (13 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 1184 times:

AA has put a lot of emphasis on being all jet at ORD.Running tv and radio advertisements to promote it.And I can not count how many passengers I have spoken to who say they will never fly United again because of the cancelled flights over the summer. A lot of which were the sames ones who said the same thing about AA back in 99 during the AA pilot sick out.When the 738 was introduced on the ORD-MIA run it started with 2 now there are 5 on a route prodominately dominated by the MD-80.United does win the battle as far as wide body service out of ORD of course,just to compare AA has about 500 AA and AE flights a day out of ORD that handled about 11 million pax last year MIA had 275 flights but handled roughly 19 million pax last year.The difference using wide bodies from 2 different type of hubs for AA.

User currently offlineHPA318 From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 124 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (13 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 1179 times:

It might suck that AA might not have ife on some flts. but at least they're taking off. Or would you rather watch a 30minute comedy sitting at a gate and not go anywhere? UA handled this summer's fiasco horribly. I work for AA, and I'll tell you we gained many loyal UA pax, that will keep coming back to AA. We're working harder than ever to be #1. The silverbird rules!

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
AA EWR-DFW Fleet Question posted Thu Feb 15 2007 03:03:40 by Tommy767
Avod - Could AA And UA Soon Follow? posted Thu Jan 4 2007 23:19:32 by 1337Delta764
Emirates VS Etihad Another AA Vs UA? posted Mon Nov 6 2006 22:35:45 by TVNWZ
Possible 787s For AA And UA posted Mon Oct 30 2006 17:12:40 by 1337Delta764
Does B6 Have Interline Agreements With AA Or UA? posted Fri Oct 27 2006 20:15:52 by FWAERJ
AA, DL, UA Vie For Boeing 787 Gold Care Contracts posted Wed Oct 18 2006 01:13:52 by WorldTraveler
Why No BUR-ORD On AA Or UA? posted Fri Oct 13 2006 18:47:40 by Travelin man
Why Are AA And UA Pulling Out Of MDW? posted Mon Aug 28 2006 22:14:26 by Chi-town
Connecting To SQ In LAX - Should I Fly AA Or UA? posted Fri Jul 7 2006 17:49:17 by Ssides
AA's MD-80 Fleet and its future, thoughts? posted Tue Jun 27 2006 00:48:34 by Thering