Aa737 From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 849 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (14 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 2089 times:
While width is great, I would much rather be able to recline more and have a little more leg room. I have only glown AA coach a few times recently, but it wa much more comforatable then the other UA flights.
Skystar From Australia, joined Jan 2000, 1363 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (14 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 2086 times:
For me, no question. Seat pitch rules and most people I know only complain about legroom, not seat width. In most aircraft, there really isn't a need to remove seats for width. The 777 is the only bird that comes across as being satisfactory in both 9 and 10 abreast configurations.
I'd rather take a 777, 10 abreast with 34" seat pitch, as opposed to one 9 abreast, but with only 31" seat pitch.
I can't say I've been in a too narrow seat, even the CRJ was fine for me. Then again, I'm not a very "wide" person.