Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
A New SST Vs An Updated Super Jumbo  
User currently offlineCaribb From Canada, joined Nov 1999, 1639 posts, RR: 8
Posted (14 years 1 month 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1668 times:

What would you prefer to see 20 years from now - A new economical, environmentally friendly, high capacity SST able to cross the Atlantic in an hour, or, a roomier larger wide bodied aircraft capable of holding upwards of 1000 people in relative luxury compared to today's standards but cruising at conventional speeds?

In otherwards should the world push the envelope of speed over enhancing current comfort and incremental technological advancement in conventional aircraft types?

3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAirman99o From Canada, joined Aug 1999, 980 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (14 years 1 month 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 1652 times:

For sure a SST!! I think that as time progresses people are going faster. and speed means you can get things done sooner and get home sooner. But I don't think that we will see that anytime soon. Also haveing a supertransportor, will be a bad idea. It takes people long enough to get out of a plane as it is. I cannot figure out how the A-3xx is going to be a very safe plane in that terms so I cannot see a higher capicity plane coming into the picture any time soon either.

Just my thoughts

Airman99o



Safety is Everyones Responsibility.
User currently offlineRIX From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 1787 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (14 years 1 month 2 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 1623 times:

SST, even if it is still able to cross the Atlantic in 3.5 hours (not in an hour) and has no transpacific range, but is more economically viable / environment friendly than Concorde. We can hardly see it in 20 years with big capacity, but small SSTs with 10-12 seats, both as business jets and in airline regular service... looks quite possible. As for another superJumbo - it will be built if there is a demand for it, but again, it will be the same cramped in economy as present airliners, from 717 to 747.

User currently offlineFlybulldog From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 369 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (14 years 1 month 2 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 1620 times:

While I think it would be fun to travel in the SST, I'd imagine that it would still be very expensive. I'd prefer to have a large jet that would make the cost of traveling overseas inexpesive.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Boeing And There New Super Jumbo. posted Sat Jan 22 2005 01:46:05 by Bmi330
New 747 Or Super Jumbo? posted Wed May 19 1999 01:26:00 by CX747
Is An Updated 777 Possible? posted Mon Nov 6 2006 17:25:53 by 1337Delta764
Airbus Faces Fresh Hit Over Super-jumbo posted Sun Oct 8 2006 07:52:41 by Windshear
New Airbus Vs 787 Or 777? posted Thu May 11 2006 04:51:44 by A380900
New Jets Vs Second Hand Jets! posted Tue Apr 18 2006 09:53:07 by Drinkstrolley
First PIA Aircraft In New Livery Is An Oldie posted Tue Mar 21 2006 18:04:39 by NA
Last ANA Boeing 747SR-100 Super Jumbo Retires posted Fri Mar 10 2006 12:22:57 by Leelaw
New Engines On An Aircraft, How Hard? posted Thu Mar 2 2006 02:23:32 by Cadet57
New A350 Vs 787 Battle In Sight posted Fri Jan 20 2006 00:08:49 by FCKC