Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
First Revenue Run AS 734C  
User currently offlineANCFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (7 years 10 months 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 2015 times:

Tomorrow is the day. There are currently two of the AS 737-400Cs at ANC. First revenue flight is to BET. Also a flight to ANC-FAI-SCC-BRW-FAI-ANC. Someone might wanna get some pics.

The story was released on NBC Local news here tonight, as soon as the broadcast is done they'll post a link on their web site: www.ktuu.com

15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineFLY777UAL From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4512 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (7 years 10 months 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 1993 times:

Aircraft 768 flying:

AS 152 ANC-OME-OTZ-ANC and then AS 146 ANC-SCC-BRW-FAI-ANC.

Exciting!

F L Y 7 7 7 U A L


User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9655 posts, RR: 68
Reply 2, posted (7 years 10 months 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 1990 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

will these ever drop down to SEA or is it AK only?

Royal


User currently offlineANCFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (7 years 10 months 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 1959 times:

Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 2):
will these ever drop down to SEA or is it AK only?

Word is they will be used exclusively in Alaska, taking over the routes from the 732Cs. That said, it was not unusual to see the occasional AS732 in SEA. Happened rather frequently in fact.

Edit to add:

Quoting RyDawg82 (Reply 4):
So perhaps they will head south in the summer to help supplement the freighter.

Particularly during "Salmon Season" when the fish are heading from ocean to dinner table in 24 hours.

[Edited 2007-02-02 05:50:11]

User currently offlineRyDawg82 From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 868 posts, RR: 8
Reply 4, posted (7 years 10 months 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 1946 times:

Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 2):
will these ever drop down to SEA or is it AK only?

I know at one point last year (when they were expected to be online), there were some Southeast-SEA flights popping up in the summer months. So perhaps they will head south in the summer to help supplement the freighter.

-R



You can take the pup out of Alaska, but you can't take the Alaska out of the pup.
User currently offlineGeorgiabill From United States of America, joined Mar 2003, 585 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (7 years 10 months 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 1918 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

How soon to Dutch Harbor?

User currently offlineANCFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (7 years 10 months 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1878 times:

Quoting Georgiabill (Reply 5):
How soon to Dutch Harbor?

Never.

AS pulled out of DUT years ago, and the runway there at 3900 feet will not handle a 734.

http://www.airnav.com/airport/PADU


User currently offlineRyDawg82 From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 868 posts, RR: 8
Reply 7, posted (7 years 10 months 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1867 times:

Quoting ANCFlyer (Reply 6):
AS pulled out of DUT years ago, and the runway there at 3900 feet will not handle a 734.

AS doesn't use their own metal to DUT; however, PenAir (KS) now operates the flights to DUT with Saab 340's. While KS is a codeshare partner of AS, this agreement is much different. The flights actually carry a AS flights number, use AS tickets/boarding cards, etc.

Spliting hairs, but...  Smile

Ryan



You can take the pup out of Alaska, but you can't take the Alaska out of the pup.
User currently offlineRoadrunner165 From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 876 posts, RR: 9
Reply 8, posted (7 years 10 months 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 1816 times:

Quoting FLY777UAL (Reply 1):
AS 152 ANC-OME-OTZ-ANC

Thank god the -400combis are finally coming! I will have to bring my camera with me to work and see if I can snap a picture or two while shes in action. After having to suffer through the last month of BS excuses by the AS staff here in Nome about freight delays I'm glad to see they are putting the -400c into Nome first. I have a entire bag of bones to pick with Alaska Air Cargo right now!! I just hope things improve with these new planes!


Adam


User currently offlineANCFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (7 years 10 months 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 1796 times:

Quoting Roadrunner165 (Reply 8):
I will have to bring my camera with me to work

Are you back up in OME??? Good for you!!

Hopefully, you'll get one of the photos uploaded here . . . .


User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29813 posts, RR: 58
Reply 10, posted (7 years 10 months 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 1778 times:

Sorry but I just don't see how AS is going to be able to make money with these aircraft.

The fixed bulkhead is what is going to economicly kill this conversion.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineANCFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (7 years 10 months 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 1764 times:

Quoting RyDawg82 (Reply 7):
AS doesn't use their own metal to DUT; however, PenAir (KS) now operates the flights to DUT with Saab 340's. While KS is a codeshare partner of AS, this agreement is much different. The flights actually carry a AS flights number, use AS tickets/boarding cards, etc.

Spliting hairs, but...

Yeah, KS sends a Saab out there.

I've been in/out of DUT on a C-130 a couple times, and that was hairy . . . I wouldn't want to do it in a 732 much less even dream of it in a 734.

There is NO margin for error.

Quoting L-188 (Reply 10):
The fixed bulkhead is what is going to economicly kill this conversion.

It will be interesting to see what comes of this. I have to think AS studied long and hard about this.

Given the additional fuselage length, that allows for 72 Pax and I believe 4 igloos in front - at the same time - that's virtually double the space on any of the 732s . . .

I mean, put 72 pax on a 732C and you're limited to only 2 igloos, right? So the cargo capacity has virtually doubled.


User currently offlineSocalatc From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 529 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (7 years 10 months 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 1760 times:

Quoting L-188 (Reply 10):
Sorry but I just don't see how AS is going to be able to make money with these aircraft.

The fixed bulkhead is what is going to economicly kill this conversion.

It does more than the -200 and uses less fuel, how do you think this will be a looser?


User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29813 posts, RR: 58
Reply 13, posted (7 years 10 months 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 1756 times:

Quoting ANCFlyer (Reply 11):
I wouldn't want to do it in a 732 much less even dream of it in a 734.

I rode it in a 737 once, Markair no less.....I know what a carrier landing feels like.

When I rode in on the Metro where I used to work, it wasn't too bad. It was definately more interesting 2 hours later when we put the Metro into Nikolski.

And interesting for the town, It has been years since anything larger then a goose had landed on that 3000 feet of gravel.

Quoting Socalatc (Reply 12):
It does more than the -200

At max capacity you can put more people in the -200 the the -400 combi and more igloos also.

And you ended up giving up any sort of load flexibility to optimise the configuration of the aircraft.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineRyDawg82 From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 868 posts, RR: 8
Reply 14, posted (7 years 10 months 1 day ago) and read 1610 times:

Quoting L-188 (Reply 13):
At max capacity you can put more people in the -200 the the -400 combi and more igloos also.

And you ended up giving up any sort of load flexibility to optimise the configuration of the aircraft.

You may lose some flexibility throughout the day; however, overall this is a huge jump in capacity. Additionally, at the end of the day it comes down to "did the freight/pax make their destination?" Now having a fleet of RNP/Head-Up display aircraft running around out there, the completion rate should increase as the flights can land with higher minimums.

As far as capacity, here is just a made up (yet very typical) scenario:
Before (with -200QC):
ANC-OTZ-OME-ANC
2x daily (1 at 56 pax/3 igloos and 1 at 72 pax/2 igloos)

ANC-OME-OTZ-ANC
1x daily (1 at 72 pax/2 igloos)

Max total for 1 day: 200 pax / 7 igloos

Now (with -400C):
ANC-OTZ-OME-ANC
2x daily (2 at 72 pax/4 igloos each)

ANC-OME-OTZ-ANC
1x daily (1 at 72 pax/4 igloos)

Max total for 1 day: 216 pax / 12 igloos

Increases of:
108% pax
171% igloos

The only time that re-configuring the -200s became really critical was when weather went down. Lets just say for a minute that the weather was at the -400 minimums. The -200 would try the next stop, or come back to ANC. Then the rest of the day Ops and the Ticket Agents would scramble to get these folks north. A -200 would be changed to all seats (111 pax) and today's groceries, mail, newspapers would get bumped until who knows how long.

Additionally, if AS can pull the -400 freighter up off the southeast run, they can use this to supplement extra sections during peak loads. I can see this becoming a huge benefit come summer time when the afternoon flight turns to a -400 (all pax). That is an all around bearcat with ton's of freight and passengers. Run the pax on the all seater with a small amount of freight, and use the freighter to pick up the slack.

Sure AS is giving up some flexibility; however, you cannot tell me this isn't a smart investment on AS' part. Last, I am sure that the ramp, CSA's, and passengers will love finally having normal sized overhead bins. This to will free up much needed belly space for bulk loading.

-R

[Edited 2007-02-02 20:49:45]


You can take the pup out of Alaska, but you can't take the Alaska out of the pup.
User currently offlineRoadrunner165 From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 876 posts, RR: 9
Reply 15, posted (7 years 10 months 14 hours ago) and read 1500 times:

I'm sure that Alaska will have no problem making money with the 400c. There is lots of cargo that needs to be moved in Alaska right now as everyone is gearing up for the busy summer season that is only a few short months away. If there is a lack of real crago, they can always fill up the plane with bypass mail. I agree with RyDawg82, having a standard 72 seat cabin has its drawbacks, but if a flight gets canceled it will be much easier to accommodate all the passengers on the next flight without sacrificing cargo loads.

Adam


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
A7-AGA First Revenue Flight? posted Thu Jun 22 2006 20:31:40 by Airsnaps
A380 First Revenue Flight posted Mon Apr 3 2006 11:58:11 by OzarkDC9
Eos JFK-STN First Revenue Flight On 10/18 posted Mon Oct 17 2005 19:17:32 by Pbb152
Tupolev Tu-204-300 First Revenue Flight! (pics) posted Sun May 29 2005 00:13:09 by Alberchico
BritishJet First Revenue Flight! posted Mon May 2 2005 16:40:20 by B742
First A380 T/O Run-stop Test (with Pic) posted Fri Apr 15 2005 12:26:44 by 707CMF
Westjet B737-800 First Revenue Flight posted Wed Apr 13 2005 03:27:07 by Dripstick
A6-EBA First Revenue Service To KHI Today posted Sun Mar 27 2005 16:20:29 by Emirates777
Where Are The First 738s For AS Going To Go? posted Tue Jan 4 2005 18:49:19 by BCAInfoSys
BA's New A321's - First Revenue Service? posted Mon Oct 18 2004 23:53:52 by Wheelsatc