Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Continental & Skyteam: Why So Few Codeshares?  
User currently offlineCba From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 4531 posts, RR: 3
Posted (7 years 7 months 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 3691 times:

I've noticed when looking online for flights, that CO does not seem to list any KL, DL or AF flights in its system for code-share purposes, which is somewhat surprising. For example, when looking for IAH-CDG, the AF flights don't show up, only the CO flights. Same thing when looking on the Air France flight. Similar KLM flights don't even show up, and neither do DL flights, however NW's flights are loaded into the system.

If these airlines are all in Skyteam together, shouldn't the flights show up for codeshare in the reservations system?

13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJimyvr From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (7 years 7 months 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 3669 times:

Quoting Cba (Thread starter):
CO does not seem to list any KL, DL or AF flights in its system for code-share purposes, which is somewhat surprising. For example, when looking for IAH-CDG, the AF flights don't show up, only the CO flights. Same thing when looking on the Air France flight. Similar KLM flights don't even show up, and neither do DL flights, however NW's flights are loaded into the system.

Due to the anti-trust and government regulartory issues, CO does not codeshare with KL, DL, AF on trans-atlantic nor it doesn't need any codeshares because basically CO flies to everywhere.

Problem with European codeshare is that with the 2006 expansion by DL and CO, plus NW, AF, KL, AZ, they're pretty much dominating the trans-atlantic route across Europe, unlike Star's penetration on hub-to-hub flights. And these airlines won't pretty much just get settled on codeshare only, they want revenue sharing as well.


User currently offlineGoldorak From France, joined Sep 2006, 1841 posts, RR: 4
Reply 2, posted (7 years 7 months 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 3598 times:

Quoting Jimyvr (Reply 1):
Due to the anti-trust and government regulartory issues, CO does not codeshare with KL, DL, AF on trans-atlantic nor it doesn't need any codeshares because basically CO flies to everywhere.

Problem with European codeshare is that with the 2006 expansion by DL and CO, plus NW, AF, KL, AZ, they're pretty much dominating the trans-atlantic route across Europe, unlike Star's penetration on hub-to-hub flights. And these airlines won't pretty much just get settled on codeshare only, they want revenue sharing as well.

This is not entirely true. CO & AF (and KL/DL) doesn't code-share on tansatlantic flights for the reason you gave (anti trust issues). However, they do code-share on flights beyond their respective hubs. By example, you will find AF code on CO domestic flights from IAH (e.g. Albuquerque) and CO code on AF domestic & european flights from CDG.
CO (or any US airlines) doesn't fly everywhere and they will always need code-share agreements to serve all the "secondary cities" they will never serve with their own metal


User currently offlineMasseyBrown From United States of America, joined Dec 2002, 5423 posts, RR: 7
Reply 3, posted (7 years 7 months 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 3562 times:

CO codeshares on trans-Pacific flights with BR and KE, but that is because CO lacks non-stops to those countries.

They also codeshare (or is it still a block sale of seats?) with VS on LHR flights.

There may be other examples; but, as Goldorak said, they mostly limit codesharing to beyond hub flights. Why not? They don't usually (VS is the exception) make any money when the passenger is on the other fellow's plane.



I love long German words like 'Freundschaftsbezeigungen'.
User currently offlineTACAA320 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (7 years 7 months 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 3558 times:

Copa Joining SkyTeam (by TACAA320 Feb 2 2007 in Civil Aviation)

User currently offlineBurnsie28 From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 7539 posts, RR: 8
Reply 5, posted (7 years 7 months 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 3504 times:

NW and CO have been partners for a long long time now.


"Some People Just Know How To Fly"- Best slogan ever, RIP NW 1926-2009
User currently offlineDeltAirlines From United States of America, joined May 1999, 8898 posts, RR: 12
Reply 6, posted (7 years 7 months 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 3444 times:

CO does have a ton of code-shares with Delta...seems like nearly every DL flight I'm on through ATL has a CO code on it (normally these flights carry a CO, AM and KE code in addition to the DL one).

User currently offlineJimyvr From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (7 years 7 months 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 3406 times:

Quoting Goldorak (Reply 2):
CO & AF (and KL/DL) doesn't code-share on tansatlantic flights for the reason you gave (anti trust issues). However, they do code-share on flights beyond their respective hubs

That's because there wasn't any green light given to CO to codeshare with AF, DL, KL on trans-atlantic flight. Perhaps they already aware with the size of CO and DL Trans-atlantic coverage, an attempt to codeshare on Trans-atlantic flight will be shot down easily.


User currently offlineDiscoverCSG From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 831 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (7 years 7 months 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 3302 times:

It's my understanding that continental.com is pretty tough about pointing the user only to CO-operated flights, or else multi-segment itineraries with at least part of the trip on CO metal.

For example, the website won't sell you ATL-EWR-ATL on DL metal (even though there's a codeshare). But, if you search for, say, ATL-CDG, it will allow you to purchase itineraries with ATL-EWR on a DL-operated, CO-coded flight and then the CO metal to CDG.

I suppose this revenue protection is one of many smart, if slightly annoying, steps CO has taken to keep afloat.

[Edited 2007-02-03 04:25:52]

User currently offlineSt530 From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 139 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (7 years 7 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 3090 times:

I don't understand why they don't codeshare with NW out of NRT to places in East Asia where CO doesn't fly, such as BKK and PVG.

User currently offlineBNAtraveler From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 410 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (7 years 7 months 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 3037 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR

CO codeshares with NW on a number of ex-NRT flights.

For example:

CO*(NW)5027 NRT-BKK
CO*(NW)5875 NRT-SIN

I don't see any codeshares to PVG, perhaps that's to make sure that they don't run afoul of their own argument about why UA and NW shouldn't be awarded any more flights to China and to support their own case for EWR-PVG.

[Edited 2007-02-03 21:54:08]

User currently offlineCba From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 4531 posts, RR: 3
Reply 11, posted (7 years 6 months 4 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 2846 times:

Ahh, I did not realize that anti-trust was an issue. However, DL and AF still code share on all of the CDG-US flights.

The CO web site must be pretty good at pointing to only CO flights. I tried to book a LHR-LYS trip through CO to make earning mileage easier (either on KL via AMS or AF via CDG), but the CO web site gave me some ridiculous itinerary connecting in Newark and THEN Amsterdam: LGW-EWR-AMS-LYS! Needless to say, I booked the trip on KLM.com.


User currently offlineGoldorak From France, joined Sep 2006, 1841 posts, RR: 4
Reply 12, posted (7 years 6 months 4 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 2774 times:

Quoting Cba (Reply 11):
Ahh, I did not realize that anti-trust was an issue. However, DL and AF still code share on all of the CDG-US flights

AF/DL and KL/NW have both antitrust immunity (and it was the case already before AF/KL merger), so they can code-share but also coordinates schedules and fares and I think even share revenues (for KL/NW). But anti trust issues appeared when KL, CO and NW joined skyteam when AF wanted to code-share with CO and NW in addition to DL, and when KL wanted to code-share with CO and DL. Until these issues are resolved, the previous agreements (AF/DL + KL/NW) remain in force and AF & CO are only allowed to code-share beyond their respective hubs, but not on routes between hubs. It's the same for KL and DL. A solution seemed to have been found with the US authorities for AF & NW as they are now code-sharing between CDG and DTW


User currently offlineAtnight From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 606 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (7 years 6 months 4 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 2640 times:

CO does codeshare with KL in almost all their routes from AMS to Africa, also with AZ and AF they codeshare a lot to the smaller cities in Europe that go beyond the hubs or destinatiosn CO flies... Honestly, CO codeshares enough with its partners IMHO.... I think CO is happier now with Skyteam than when first joined....


B707 B727 B733/5/7/8/9 B742/4 B752/3 B763/4 B772 A310 A318/319/320 A332 A343 MD80 DC9/10 CRJ200 ERJ145 ERJ-170 Be1900 Da
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why So Few European Destinations From LAX? posted Thu Feb 1 2007 23:21:25 by JRDC930
Why So Few 340's Across The Pacific? posted Wed Jan 10 2007 00:32:10 by Don81603
Why So Few 777's In HNL? posted Sun Jan 7 2007 05:09:34 by BAalltheway
Why So Few Long Haul Low Cost Carriers? posted Fri Jan 5 2007 13:42:42 by 777MAS
Why So Few Airlines On ZRH-UK? posted Wed Nov 22 2006 18:29:53 by 717fan
Why So Few Codeshare Flts @ YYZ posted Fri Nov 3 2006 05:54:18 by RicardoFG
ATA- Why So Few Cities Served From MDW? posted Thu Aug 10 2006 23:51:51 by Eastern1985
Hawaiian Airlines - Why So Few Intl Routes? posted Sat Aug 5 2006 05:03:31 by EmSeeEye
Gibraltar - Why So Few Flights posted Sat Jul 29 2006 03:17:28 by StarGoldLHR
PBI - Nice Airport, Why So Few Flights? posted Tue Jul 11 2006 14:52:06 by ContinentalGuy