Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Please Explain KLM-AF In South America  
User currently offlineEastern023 From United States of America, joined Jul 2006, 880 posts, RR: 0
Posted (7 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 2959 times:

Please someone explain how this alliance is working. Would AF keep the South american routes and KLM pull out?. Would KLM keep some routes?. What are the chances of KLM expanding in South America.....Sorry I am confused..


AA will Rise Again!
5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineHB-IWC From Indonesia, joined Sep 2000, 4507 posts, RR: 72
Reply 1, posted (7 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 2920 times:

In South America, the only market which is for the time being deemed large enough for it to be served by both carriers is Brasil, which sees daily service from both AF (twice GRU, once GIG increasing to twice daily next winter) and KL (daily GRU).

All other markets have been split up between the two airlines, and as a result of that division, KLM early on in the AF-KL tie up pulled out of CCS. The agreement calls for the following split up:


Air France:

Venezuela - daily CCS
Colombia - daily BOG
French Guyana - daily CAY
Argentina - daily EZE
Chile - 5 weekly SCL, increasing to daily next winter


KLM:

Peru - daily LIM, 6 weekly next summer with the introduction of nonstop service
Ecuador - 5 weekly GYE-UIO, increasing to 6 weekly next summer
Suriname - 3 weekly PBM


As to future amendments to this split up, they will most likely be determined by both the need for additional capacity in certain markets and the ability of the individual carriers to respond to such requests. The ability could be thwarted by lack of resources and restrictions pertaining to bilateral air services agreements.


User currently offlineN328KF From United States of America, joined May 2004, 6491 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (7 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 2857 times:

Quoting Eastern023 (Thread starter):
Please someone explain how this alliance is working.

One thing you need to understand is that this is not an alliance. They are the same company, though there are arguments about who is really in charge.



When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.' T.Roosevelt
User currently offlineEastern023 From United States of America, joined Jul 2006, 880 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (7 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 2831 times:

Quoting N328KF (Reply 2):
One thing you need to understand is that this is not an alliance. They are the same company, though there are arguments about who is really in charge.

Please excuse my ignorance on this. So will they ever join liveries and become one brand?. CDG and AMS are way too close as hubs. I'm just trying to understand how its all going to work.



AA will Rise Again!
User currently offlineHB-IWC From Indonesia, joined Sep 2000, 4507 posts, RR: 72
Reply 4, posted (7 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 2765 times:

Quoting Eastern023 (Reply 3):
CDG and AMS are way too close as hubs. I'm just trying to understand how its all going to work.

As it goes, CDG and AMS are actually further apart than MUC and ZRH, another pair of longhaul hubs belonging to the same company (LH/LX) in their own right. If you also throw FRA into the equation then you have a line of three LH/LX longhaul hubs (FRA-MUC-ZRH) at closer distance from each other than CDG and AMS.

As to how all of this is supposed to work, I guess my previous post is pretty explanatory. AF and KL are both serving the major markets, and have split up the secondary markets between them so as to create a situation where these secondary longhaul destinations are served from just one of the hubs, yet with a greater frequency than was previously possible.

Examples of the latter - where one carrier has pulled out in favor of the other - are abundant: MNL (daily from AMS), CCS (daily from CDG), CGK (daily from AMS), EZE (daily from CDG) and many more.

A similar split up has been established for certain secondary short and medium haul markets, where KLM is typically in charge for Northern Europe whereas Air France takes better care of Southern Europe and Northern Africa.

The question of how all of this is going to work is, as such, a bit irrelevant. The system is very much up and running and both airlines have benefitted greatly from the synergies created by their merger. Whether this merger has been beneficial to the passenger is very much up for debate.


User currently offlineOrlando666 From Netherlands, joined Apr 2005, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (7 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 2701 times:

business-wise, AF-KL link-up savings have exceeded even their own estimates.

service-wise, since AF-KL link-up, passenger service/quality has plummeted.

plenty dutch (myself included) going to star alliance ex-AMS.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
KLM Check In Question posted Sun Jan 7 2007 22:33:44 by KWI
Domestic Flights In South Korea posted Tue Dec 26 2006 23:35:40 by Alespesl
KLM/AF Flying Blue Question? posted Mon Nov 13 2006 20:57:57 by Ryanair737
Interair & Agents In South Africa posted Mon Nov 6 2006 00:20:31 by Abrelosojos
"Mango" Starts Flying In South Africa On Nov 15 posted Mon Oct 30 2006 15:10:28 by SA7700
Korean Air New Destinations In South And SE Asia posted Fri Sep 29 2006 21:02:12 by 777way
KLM Stopover In Bonaire:do We Got Off The A/c? posted Fri Sep 22 2006 09:02:19 by RootsAir
KLM A330 In BCN posted Thu Sep 7 2006 12:21:18 by JJJ
Toronto Central Terminal - Please Explain? posted Fri Aug 25 2006 09:40:08 by EK413
World Cup 2014 In South America, EK Should Prepare posted Mon Jul 10 2006 14:15:32 by EK156